Jobu

There is a theory it's pork. Or remnants of pork. I would go with the slaughterhouse weapon of choice, a captive bolt pistol. Maybe bring a blender too. I am waiting for someone to post a Youtube of a slaughterhouse kill floor. That should get the natives going. Nothing like entrapping an animal in gates and pulling the trigger on a bolt pistol. What a sport.

I do as well.

Sanchez sucks. The only thing that made him look good was Chip Kelly, and I don't see us picking up Chip Kelly anytime soon.

That was a good read yolo. Thanks.

This should be fun if we sign him.

It would be ideal for sure.

Page 29 post 575 from Kemp2warlick Lol

I believe someone already posted this IN the qb thread.

The more you post, the more clueless you appear to be. What about Jim Plunkett, Trent Dilfer, Rich Gannon, Brett Favre, Kurt Warner, Steve Young, and on and on and on? Your argument is flawed.

I suppose you like your meat killed with a captive bolt pistol eh?

Watch the replay. Oh mighty silent one.

Thats your first problem.

You can think what you want, watch the replay. Both unequivocally shut the crowd up. Statistics are just that, statistics. They prove nothing. Now, if you had the same statistics representing the same players on both sides of the ball, you might have a decent argument.

You can stop by and pick up the gut pile anytime.

No I am not kidding. I live in Packerland and have heard various opinions, and I disagree with your opinion. Hostile road environment. You put points on the board there. You go for it and don't get in, that hostile road environment just got a lot more hostile. Both those field goals shut the crowd up immediately, and further more it's not the reason they lost the game. Either the interception that Burnett just went down on, the fake field goal, or the onsides (where the hands player was not allowed to catch the ball by a blocking player) were far more significant plays. Since two out of the three were special teams, and Slocum was already on thin ice--he got axed. It's true. St. Louis and Cleveland both wanted to interview him. Green Bay has been doing this for years.

I don't think anyone blames McCarthy for the Seattle loss. That was already dealt with when they fired Slocum. He is being blamed for his over reliance of passing the ball as evidenced in the loss at Buffalo, which cost them home field advantage in the Playoffs. They were gashing us on the ground that game. It is mystifying as to why they went away from it.

McCarthy/Rodgers calling the plays is what cost them the game in Buffalo this year and ultimately home field advantage during the playoffs. They abandoned the run. All they had to do was keep running the ball and they would have easily won that game.

I think Clive Walford is probably available with our 2nd. I would not mind that pick. Can't see taking a running back there.

Here it is http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/143283-the-bill-curtain-williams-williams-and-dareus/

It's to keep them from making a lateral move.

Yeah there was. I still like "The Meat Curtain" lol

I don't know have you read the whole report? http://ht.cdn.turner.com/si/images/2014/02/14/PaulWeissReport.pdf I don't think the whole thing can be white washed away as locker room banter. That being said, I think if Martin had just grown a set and stood up for himself, none of this would have happened.

Interesting that Bennett got the OC rather than Van Pelt. My guess is that Van Pelt is gone after next season. Several teams wanted to interview him for OC this season and Green Bay would not allow it.

Not an upgrade? Are you smoking crack? Who is better? Urbik? Pears? Williams? No, No, and No. I bet he will be a starter from day 1.

Personally, I like to cut my venison with angus beef suet for sausage. And I agree, changing a tire, checking/adding fluids, changing a fuse, are all essentials that I made sure my daughter knows how to do.