loserlovers

No

White on blue looks f'ing stupid. White on white looks awesome and is by far their best look in years.

ya maybe baseball and you thought it was the football. Just because you don't notice details you could not act like the OP is an idiot with your condescending answer. You might as well have said" really ? I am very simple and don't notice details". Or " me like football."

not like Trent when he used to use the "broken brain" excuse.

Roses r red Jets are not blue Williams' burst in Turn snachez to poo. Is that a haiku?

You won't put revis on a pedestal but you bow to Sj as if he's Jesus. "Immaculate" ????come on. Do you volunteer to wash his balls after the game too? His immaculate balls. lol I know. Rookies who don't like a post that rips their fav player like to go after punctuation. It's a cell phone problem but who knows if you've ever gotten off aol and your 33.6 modem. You obviously got hurt I didn't post that sj is gonna own revis again. Fyi. My post doesn't dictate the future and guys who rip grammar are lame and have no logical retort. That's "retort", I know you thought "retard" right?

I've said since last year. Revis looks.at.Sj as a day off but.Sj treats revis like a super bowl and plays his A GAME. I think.revis.is.gonna shut Sj down big time this year. Sorry but its my prediction..

that's because we signed TO and also because Sj i sn't that talented. Evans was great from his first year onward. So are other true number ones. Aiken looks good.enough to be.a.fourth.

what if we trade__________ for _____________ and then ____________ to ___________________ and then __________ to ________________ for _____________? we really need a thread for every guys idea of a trade? even without any news of it being a remote possibilty.

damn you eball that was mine....

ya, how unfair it was to give him 3 years at the reigns and name him starter when he had already failed multiple times. It was also our fault that he refused to throw normal passes in the nfl. The kind that go 10 yards or more. What jerks we were to "ruin" him by not giving him the best o line in the nfl. I personally would never go make millions, be on TV, be famous, then refuse to just throw a ball ten yards...that would ruin me! i was actually underneath your seat the whole time. did you notice me? I didnt mind until you ordered that burrito. its called, he wouldnt throw down the middle in any game before arizona, he wouldnt throw down the middle in any game after arizona. after the chargers, the NFL figured out to cover te backs and trent was finished....as simple as that.

end world hunger now.

ive hardly heard any of these before, must be old school.

Ok so ya we look like crap so far, and ya its just preseason and we're just "evaluating" talent so before we start cutting players and calling for new coaches lets have some fun. These are the best bills quotes I can think of but I know there are lots more so lets start compliling them all. 1." Its hard to win in the NFL"- skeletor 2. " 'must' win? world war 2, now that was a 'must' win."- marv 3. " Im Ko simpson and Im worth millions"- K.S.

i refuse to read your post until you learn how to use the font size button.

i agree with you mike 1 i do think shepp sucks though 2. i do worry how fitz always throws 5 yard slants on third and long. Blitz or not, he needs throw past the D, not struggle to complete 5 yarders right where the db is standing and get 5 yards when we need 15. Stupid.

i guess you dont read my posts, but just repeat your opinion without letting logic or reasoning sink in. almost all people on the board understand how statistics dont show the truth. there are many ifs, and statistics totally lie, very often. Heres a famous one. under wade philips we were 21-10 or some BS like that. = he was a good coach. But the truth was, under our defense and doug flutie we were 21-10, and the losses were the games wade put rob johnson in. if you watched those seasons you could see wade was an idiot. but the sats lie. Trent was 5-1 once without going deep once. right now chan is 10-22, but everyone loves him. stats prove themselves over time. a very long time. like Brett farve or jerry rice. no one can argue these type of stats, but where are wade and trent now? wheres chan gailey? wheres rob johnson who always mantained a high qb rating in all his losses? but ill take you and your beer bet. i said when he was "here" and one play doesnt erase 7 years of good play, oh and SJ must be a double chump for having two huge drops....where no one was near him.

we picked up a firsts several times on it last year. it forces other teams to waste game prep time on it. It is easy for us to run as its mostly just a power running option type offense. It helped miami win a lot of games on when they sucked otherwise. It allows some cheap td passes if you run it effectively. and finally.....it worked well as a change up in Madden! if i ran it too much it would get stuffed but when i yanked it out on big third downs it would always work. it is just so different than a normal play it throws defenses off. I like it!

i fixed your post rico, when exactly did evans ever fail in the clutch? crap season statistcs were more a result of crap coaching and worse QB'ing, but I dont remember any big game drops when evans was here. Not like SJ's pittsburg or NY jets game losing drops.

wow you really mix and match points just to suit your argument dont you. I said the old regimes cut good players, you point out current players who we signed. I agree with what we do now, including keeping meriman and easley until we know for sure. You are wrong about graham, he was most definitely signed as evans' replacement, you said speed was evans' game, well evans was faster and stronger than graham, who was signed for his speed, as quoted by chan. i think i said twice about mcgahee being an example of a productive old guy, cut by the ravens...who is still starting even though hes slower. you argue about "why we cut him" i know why, but it doesnt change the facts about what happened after we cut him and his current age= to evans. one more try...the point is lee evans could still be very good, you dont really know anymore than what someone watching the news knows, there are 30 teams that may sign him still, if they do and he plays well...you are totally wrong about your position on his skills and if we made a mistake. I dont think a fourth for a first rounder is a good trade, we also had to use a third on his replacement who may suck. so why you try to argue that age = lost speed, mcgahee was a cancer, bills made good signings etc... I dont know. i agree with all that. But i also see alot of old guys that have second winds in their careers after injury. your main point is "3 YEARS OF POOR STATS" ok well thats a rediculous point. He was injured for half of the last two seasons and the third season had trent edwards at qb who won 2 games and never threw deep! stats dont tell that story and if injuries are used to judge players, how were merimans and easleys last two years? why do we keep them around?

are you done? really? So you missed the point and made a few assumptions 1. you know lee evans "lost a step"? how do you know this? he played well in the afc champ game, he had 5 catches and a huge missed td, just like SJ in his much revered REVIS GAME. we lost that game on SJ's drop but now we say it was a all-league performance. 2. the point made about spikes,fletcher, and mcgahee wasnt about attitude, its about waiting to see if the injury or age really will matter, rather than just cutting a guy the year hes injured and assuming hes "done". (notice how now we wait on easley and meriman for years) 3. also mcgahee was cut by the ravens, did that mean he was "done"? hes 31 and lost a step but still gets it done. did evans also lose his hands because of age? 4.lynch and poz were mentioned as the replacements to fletcher and mcgahee, we wasted first rounders on those two and they didnt work out. we could have just kept london and mcgahee and forced mcgahee to play out his contract. but thats besides the point. instead of asking if i was out of town or suggesting im clueless, read the post better and you will see nothing i said can be argued. no one here knows for sure lee evans true condition and trying to guess it due to his being cut...is just a guess. We now have to hope easley or graham are as good as evans was....and I highly doubt they will be. if evans has a good year it will be one more example of us shippin out an injured player who makes a comeback for someone else.

ii dont remember awesome, i remember alot of saying how he didnt read the defense, or go deep still,, i remember beat writers saying he kept getting hit on the chin in practice and throwing wobbly deep balls. The main point was, being cut means nothing, and being kept, can mean nothing, and being injured is temporary. and that coaches are more biased than us. we want everyone cut or traded it seems and say everyones "finished" after 30

to me thats the whole reason this has happened. he was injured before being traded, then injured again , then had a bad afc non-catch(not drop) then he picks the jags and thinks he'll be a # 3 or a 4. maybe lee asked for a release? maybe this is still injury related. Maybe you all said the same things about takeo spikes when he got hurt, then cut, then went to two teams, then played great for another 3-4 years. Or a guy named lynch, wou was traded for a fourth, played backup on the seahawks for half a season, now look at how crappy he is playing. Or maybe youve heard of old washed up london fletcher, is he still around? we cut his worthless a$$ right? we replaced him with a better guy (Poz,who we let go already) oh and howd our mcgahee trade work out? did we finally get a running back after spending two first rounders to replace him? does he still play after being cut by the ravens? isnt he 31? isnt our starting RB 31? Logic? maybe if you take two seconds to look at history you could see how many players we said were washed up, or too old and then spent years trying to replace them, the whole while watching them rack up numbers for another team.

ya like when us fans only saw trent edwards play on tv,but gailey and nix thought they could resurrect him and named hm the 2010 starter. what did we know! We see alot on tv because the games are what count, not the practices. coaches who sign guys off other teams do this mainly from what they saw in games also. They dont have daily interactions with them. I think if anyones biased its coaches who draft and sign 'their own" and cant admit when they messed up, and stay attatched way too long. We are far less biased as fans (most of us) Usually i agree w you ptr, but whats going on with you lately? you will need to admit youre wrong when lee gets signed by the next team and contributes.

if you read my post, you will see i said he wasnt physical, but tht it wasnt a drop, thats a 100 percent accurate, it wasnt a drop, thats what i said. nothing about, if he shoulda had it. HE SHOULD HAVE. but the defender got lucky. not only hitting the ball perfectly straight down between his hands where they couldnt stop the force of the DB, but also if you look closely, he hit Lee's face mask in the same motion. Not excusing Lee but the PHYSICS of the play dont know it was a super bowl bound play or a pre season play. Let me say this...many of Lees td's in his career, I noticed, were effortless, some one handed, in the endzone, along the sideline, dragging two toes. I was always amazed he didnt drop them but that was his advantage, being completely fluid and pure in his style. I dont think Lee ever had to be "physical", it wasnt really necessary. I think it was horrible luck, that the one time he needed to be like Micheal Irvin, or Andre Reed, he played soft and had the ball knocked out of his hands. But he did have "superaltive" hands which means he caught the balls that were in his hands, that a defender did not also get his hands on.