Likely adding void years to the contract and spreading that 107m cap hit over 2-3 more years so they are only tied to ~21-34m per year after this season.
Rodgers would also have to accept since they are adding the void years to offset the cap hit.
He only has to agree if it changes the length of contract I think. If they do the "kick the can" route and give him the money up front and AZ eats it then he doesn't have to. If they try to add void years to his contract and extend his salary/cap hit over those terms, he will need to sign off on it.
Pretty sure he needs to have his contract reworked before the trade by AZ so he fits under the cap (or AZ eats some of it). I think you can't take on a cap hit that puts you over and then try to rework it.
It's going to be a 5 team trade where transactions will occur through the first 2 months of the season and traded to a new team every two weeks. At the November 1st deadline, the team he had the most touchdowns with will retain/regain his rights for the remainder of the season.
The intent is to troll.
I especially like the "Mac is ahead of all of them" comment.
I mean when it's out of 4 players you could say Mac is the 4th best still making him the worst.
Rodgers was also an anomaly too, right?
Regardless, that's not the point of the comment that I originally made.
We are one bad play away from being in another 17 year drought was all I was getting at. Why not protect that for as long as you can?
It will be nothing but loud noises until his contract is reworked if it happens. And then the loud noises will continue about how it's a good/bad contract.
New rendering are on the way!
https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/rochester/human-interest/2023/04/21/depew-middle-school-students-design-new-bills-stadium-with-video-game?cid=id-app15_m-share_s-web_cmp-app_launch_august2020_c-producer_posts_po-organic#