birdog1960

seems paul ryan agrees: http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/ryan-trump-racist/2016/06/07/id/732679/

wow, a concession from one of the 2 mentioned groups. can we now say "bad" if he doesn't make a significant contribution this year?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-racist-examples_us_56d47177e4b03260bf777e83 “I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control" you can't make this shite up. and it's spread all over trump's lips.

He won't be seeing the field for months but Shaq Lawson is now under contract for the Buffalo Bills. The outside linebacker/end who recently underwent shoulder surgery inked his rookie deal with the team Monday, leaving fourth-rounder Cardale Jones as the only unsigned draft pick. Lawson, the 19th overall selection, was drafted to add more bite to Buffalo's pass rush. He may do exactly that, too. But after suffering the team termed "an occurrence" in rookie minicamp, he needed surgery. A year ago, Lawson was one of the most dominant defensive players in college football with 12.5 sacks, 25.5 tackles for loss and at least two QB pressures in five different games. Thus, head coach Rex Ryan planned on starting Lawson immediately in his 3-4 defense opposite Jerry Hughes. The 6-foot-3, 270-pounder will be now confined to the meeting rooms until possibly the mid-season. Ryan repeated during OTA's that this surgery will get Lawson to "100 percent." ADVERTISEMENT "Look, could he have played the five weeks? He absolutely could have played," Ryan said. "When we got him in here, could he have been effective, he was pretty effective playing. But we want him at 100 percent. I think that was why we did what we did. ... When we had this thing, you know what let’s get it done right, where this guy is at 100 percent. "We feel great about our draft, but again this isn’t a devastating thing. I think if we see the big picture this is not a devastating injury at all. We just think it is what it is. He is not going to be available for how many games, we can’t even tell you that... anybody spinning this into something good is either a bills employee or totally delusional.

ah, you are openly speaking for the "collective" now.

"some of my best friends are black". geez, I thought that tired rationalization ended a decade or two ago.

yes, that's exactly why trump will be the republican nominee. its almost makes me feel they deserve to be exploited...just don't drag everyone else down with them. clinton was not my choice. the nomination process in the den party needs reform and the fact that bernie did so well shows that many folks would support it.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/trump-university-its-worse-than-you-think Will one of the world’s leading democracies elect as its President a businessman who founded and operated a for-profit learning annex that some of its own employees regarded as a giant rip-off, and that the highest legal officer in New York State has described as a classic bait-and-switch scheme? “Trump U is devastating because it’s metaphor for his whole campaign: promising hardworking Americans way to get ahead, but all based on lies.

nah, they probably don't even have much of a library much less prestigious surgery journals that document interesting cases such as the shah of iran's.

looks like English wasn't a prerequisite at trump university.

so you're backing away from that whole "he wasn't charged" thing. cool. cuz he was. by several accepted definitions of the word

you clearly missed the headline of my most recent link: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ny-attorney-general-back-off-trump-fraud-case/story?id=39515501. the NY AG is schneiderman. can't be bothered to look up the name of his cali counterpart. any other stupid questions that have already been answered in this very thread?

i actually like this one: 1 a formal accusation by the authorities that the accused has committed a specified offence. from the very same site. but your question clearly implies the lack of simplicity of the word...

seems like an appropriate word given the plethora of legal meanings: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/chargehttp://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/charge To impose a burden, duty, obligation, or lien; to create a claim against property; to assess; to demand; to accuse; to instruct a jury on matters of law. To impose a tax, duty, or trust. To entrust with responsibilities andduties (e.g., care of another). In commercial transactions, to bill or invoice; to purchase on credit. In Criminal Law, to indict or formally accuse.

an analogous situation would be a liberal comparing trump's indiscretions to hillary's on the hillary thread. how bout you point that one out and not post ridiculously inequivalent analogies? yes, you never see obfuscation despite being a frequent practitioner. but thuis is the trump thread. ridiculously simple isn't it?

hmmm..almost as if there were a concerted effort to obfuscate. as if Hillary's legal issues have never been debated on ppp... as if trump's fraud charges are not important in their own right...

wow. talk about mincing words. they are civil suits. they allege fraud. most importantly, they will hurt trump's run (but not likely with support from the morons here)...watch...and see. that's the point. you can't make this shite up: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-university-fraud-allegations_us_56ddf3b9e4b0000de405887c give him enough rope... "In the video, Trump reveals the full names of two former Trump University participants who say they were ripped off by the program. He holds up positive course evaluation forms he says they filled out. Trump adds that he’s “looking for” a third program customer, presumably referring to a woman who also publicly has claimed she was scammed by Trump’s business. The men Trump mentions in his video both appeared in ads funded by the nonprofit American Future Fund, a conservative group with ties to billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. In those videos, people — identified by first names only — describe spending more than $30,000 on Trump University seminars, and allege that they did not receive the guidance and instruction they were promised." what a clown.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ny-attorney-general-back-off-trump-fraud-case/story?id=39515501 "The New York state case against Trump University, brought in 2013, is proceeding at the same time as a federal lawsuit unfolds in California, both with essentially the same set of allegations -- that the real estate seminars marketed by the famous real estate mogul cheated the people who paid thousands of dollars to attend. As became clear today, the cases are unfolding in a highly unusual climate for a civil cases." i'm talking about testimony just released yesterday and just now hitting the news cycle. trump already weakly responded to it. this won't go away soon. he allegedly cheated the very demographic group that consititutes his core. but most are still too dumb to realize it. those in the middle will get it.

i'm deliberating between a second and a new York minute....um,wait...no. but it's not relevant today. when sealed documents are released on her emails you can post on her thread how miuch harm it will do to her campaign. and i'll hold you to it. this hurts trump. not with his core but with the middle. a lot.

perhaps you should stop trying to portray yourself as ignorant. you're quite convincing. I said "if he were to win...". it's extremely relevant to a thread on him being alone at the top. the wave of media reports on this is just a swell now. by tomorrow it will be everywhere.

he is far from disassociated from these charges. he's at the very center. has Hillary been formally charged with fraud like trump? news to me.

so if , God forbid, he wins, he could be the first sitting president defending himself in court over a fraud charge: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/former-trump-university-workers-call-the-school-a-%E2%80%98lie%E2%80%99-and-a-%E2%80%98scheme%E2%80%99-in-testimony/ar-BBtIXRt?ocid=ansmsnnews11 "Mr. Trump had fought Tuesday’s release of previously sealed documents in the case. In an apparent attempt to discredit the judge in the case, Gonzalo P. Curiel, Mr. Trump called him biased and a “hater of Donald Trump,” and he sought to draw attention to the judge’s ethnic background — “we believe Mexican,” Mr. Trump said. (Mr. Curiel was born in Indiana; he is of Mexican descent.)" what a douche...

if he had a vagina, he'd call out trump on his disgusting act. we need more vaginas. vaginas are good.

do you believe there is anywhere near an equal conflict of interests re this reporting by bills pr people and independent journalists?

the better question is "who ever believed the bills public relations bs anyway??" and the answer is 10's of thousands of fans per year and probably 100's of thousands over the history of the team. the next question is: "why would anyone believe the reporting of a vested interest over that of a journalist whose long term career is dependent on his/her reader's trust? got me. best I can come up with is wishful thinking that the pr is true.