Jump to content

vincec

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,818
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vincec

  1. No. This game needs to be cancelled. It's absolutely the worst of the all start games. Practically no strategy, everyone who doesn't cop out with some excuse is scared to get hurt, practically no real hitting, it's played after the season is over... It's basically a pickup game in the park, which may be ok for baseball or basketball but is not really what football is about. Once you take the physicality out of football, it's not the same game.

     

    BTW- I love that Lou Holtz quote about your problems. I really looked forward to his "Dr. Lou" segments this year. That dude is surprisingly funny. The one about how he used to get his QB to throw fewer interceptions is the best...

  2. I like this idea. David Carr is worth a look.

    I live in Charlotte and witnessed the David Carr debacle last year. I was pretty excited when they brought him in, but Carr was so bad that most people were happy to see Matt Moore (the third string quarterback) go in after Carr got injured. In fact, many people credibly believed that the coaching staff exaggerated his injury so that they could bench him for the remainder of the season without publicly destroying his reputation.

  3. I'm not sure where this "bust" thing is coming from. I hear people saying that they were disappointed with his season, but I didn't hear anyone call him a "bust". He will be given more time to develop, but remember that this is the NFL (Not For Long) and he needs to show something soon.

     

    I was concerned on draft day when I kept hearing the Bills describe him as a "red zone specialist" and "big bodied possession receiver". I think that if you are looking for such specific player types when you draft in the NFL you take the risk of "reaching" for a player. Just draft the best receiver/player available and adjust your offense to suit his particular skill set. I'm not sure that Hardy was the best receiver available when we took him.

     

    Hopefully he will develop into exactly what the Bills were looking for...

  4. So where were all of the Kurt Warner lovers last year or the year before? Arizona was trying to turn their offense over to Matt Leinart. This just goes to show the "what have you done for me lately" spirit of the NFL and its fans. As Al Davis once said, great players don't just forget how to play in the offseason.

  5. Peyton Manning. If you only get one guy, it has to be a QB. They have the most individual impact on the game. He will still play at a high level for 3 or 4 more years too. Matt Ryan looked good this year, but lots of players have had 1 good year in a row. I think we need to see 2 or 3 more before we can say he's anywhere near Peyton's class.

     

    PS- If I got another player it would be Haynesworth... and if I got two or three more I might actually get us into the playoffs.

  6. I never considered playing time when I was formulating my opinion. I agree somewhat, he wasn't an every down player like jim or Bruce and so many others although his phase of the game isn't on the field to run as many plays as offense or defense but is considered 1/3'rd of the game and he exelled evrytime. In his aspect of the game he made a tremendous impact and I believe his play helped to elevate the importance of special teams that we see today- not to take anything away from the coaches he was fortunate to play for.

     

    How many kickers` are in the hall? I'm too lazy to look it up. Shouldn't Jason Elam get in first ballot although he didn't have as many snaps as Elway? He has stats to back him up too.

    As far as I know there is 1 kicker in the hall of fame, Jan Stenerud, and no punters. There are 247 members...

  7. Andre is viewed by many sports writers as proliferate receiver but not a dominating one who can take over games. If you look at stats that he had a maximum of 90 catches a year - how many WRs have had more than 90 catches in a game? Over 120 WRs have. That is just one sample how sports writers dissect his career with many of them now not seeing him in his prime. Very, very good for a long time but not great for multiple seasons.

    I think you mean 90 catches in a season. 90 catches in a game probably would get you into the hall!

  8. Congrats to both Ralph and Bruce. I was especially happy to see Ralph's induction. He was one of the original pioneers that built the modern NFL and I think that he still brings those old school values to the owner's meetings.

     

    Unfortunately, I don't think any other Bills from the Super Bowl teams will make it, but I'm hoping for them...

  9. Tasker was a great special teams player, but special teams only players just don't get into the hall. They don't play enough downs and there hasn't been one yet who has made anywhere near the impact that a regular offensive or defense player has over the course of his career. Consider the impact that Jim Kelly or Bruce Smith had on games versus what Tasker could do with only maybe 10 plays total.

     

    I'd like to see Reed get in as the last member of the Buffalo Super Bowl teams but I think it's unlikely. There are just so many great WR who are not yet in the hall. I think that successful WRs are viewed more a products of passing systems, great quarterbacks and rules changes in coverage so you really have to stand out to make it. Jimmy Johnson once said that Troy Aikman and Emmitt Smith are a great players, Michael Irvin is a great player when he has Troy Aikman. I think that sums up many voters thinking.

  10. The Cards are 9-7. So they won exactly 2 more games than the Bills. They play in one of the worst divisions ever, whoch they went 6-0 in. They went 3-7 outside it. Any other division and they don't make the playoffs. This is not some super power. They aren't much better than the Bills.

    Arizona is much better than the Bills. I was at that game and it was no mirage. Obviously with no pass rush, no one who can cover Larry Fitzgerald and Loss-man at QB, your going to have trouble, but consider that since Arizona beat Buffalo 41-17 they have improved (especially on defense) and Buffalo went into the tank. Better coaching, better utilization of player's skills and better player development.

     

    If you go down the line player for player it may be close, but if you look at how the teams are playing and what kind of production their getting from their players and their system, it's no contest.

  11. It's interesting to see Derrick Dockery's name come up on some of these lists. Based on his performance, he is lucky to be starting for OUR team. I think that most of the trouble that the left site of the OL has had in short yardage running and blitz/stunt pickup is because of him. He hasn't gotten much push in the running game and seems to lose his man on blitzes and stunts. Frankly, I don't think that he's played much better that Brad Butler despite the huge difference in salary.

  12. Maybe I don't get it, but if I wanted to win football games I would keep players that are performing well and release players that are not. London Fletcher was one of our best defensive players when we released him. He went on to produce for Washington and we went back to the draft board trying to replace him (which we still haven't done). It's like the people that suggest we trade Peters. We need to keep our good players and try to build around them, not constantly start over for one reason or another... He's too old, he want's too much money, he's got a bad attitude, he doesn't fit our new system, etc. These are just bad excuses for getting rid of good players.

×
×
  • Create New...