Jump to content

cowtippur

Community Member
  • Posts

    417
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cowtippur

  1. But, here's the thing, we don't have to like it. Yes, Trent is currently the QB. But he sucks and I don't like it. I will let express my dislike for him every chance I get. That does not diminish the fact that I am a diehard Bills fan. I love the team and want them to be successful. I really don't like Trent Edwards and wish he were not on my team. I am rooting for him to be successful and will cheer when he does something well, but I will also boo at him and complain about him when he does something bad.

    Fine, you don't like it. If we had a better option on the team, wouldn't Gailey be playing him? This is what we have. It doesn't do a lot of good to go to a free practice and heckle Edwards. I don't see the point.

     

    Maybe with the new 18 game schedule all this will be done away with anyway. The training camps will probably not be held the way they are now and this won't matter. According to what was said the other day, these camps will not be held at the smaller schools and smaller towns, but probably held at the stadiums, since the preseason will be so short.

  2. Yes, complaining about big plays seems rather ridiculous.

    Nobody was complaining about them. They are great, exciting, they do help drives. My original point was that we have not seen our starting offense, again I will use the word, sustain a scoring drive. Those were big plays that were TD's. Had they happened on the other end of the field, not ending in a score, would the offense still be able to put it in the end zone? I'm not complaining about the big play. Come on guys, can't you find anything better to do that nit pick and twist what is said to support your own convoluted ideas of cynicism?

  3. Honestly, I hate when we just take what they give us, instead of forcing the underneath stuff... You know, just to prove we can.

     

    (sarcasm)

    That's fantastic. A team that relies on a big play to score won't go far. Eventually the big play isn't there. At some point you have to be able to actually drive down the field.

  4. No. Like the previous poster, it has nothing to do with being upset with team or anything. I am actually looking forward to the upcoming season, but I just can't see paying that much to watch them. I think it would be great to see every game, but just can't bring myself to pay that when I could be out riding a my bike down a trail or something.

  5. I've seen quite a lot of Edwards here. He was excellent in college, especially in Division 2. Yes, he stepped out and beat some big boys from time to time like Michigan, but the overwhelming knock on him is his size. He just isn't big enough to be a NFL quarterback. He is blazing fast and can throw the ball well, but he can't see over the linemen in front of him.

  6. Campbell is better than anything we have. While that's not saying much, Campbell is in my opinion a more serviceable qb. He can make the throws, he can run when needed, and given consistency in the coaching staff, he will be good. This guy learned a new system every year. Here he will have stability, since our head coach will be the OC. Not to mention Gailey has the affinity for the spread offense, which would probably work well with Campbell.

     

    I can't, however, see going after another head case like Bulger. He had a couple good years and played in a dome. His head would be scrambled eggs behind our o-line.

  7. That the Packers are on that list should tell you what's really at work in turning-off players.

    I guess in the end, millions are millions. It's probably nicer to spend them in San Diego than Buffalo. If you have the talent to choose where you go, you may as well go where it's comfortable. These guys won't have loyalty to a team, there have been far too many teams without loyalty to the players.

  8. just the least:

     

    Oakland Raiders- 20%

    Buffalo Bills- 14%

    Green Bay Packers- 13%

    Detroit Lions- 12%

    Cleveland Browns- 7%

     

     

    It didn't say the most, but that would be interesting to see.

     

    So outside of crazy Al, it's cold weather teams, mostly without a dome that are in small markets and haven't won recently. It seems strange to see Green Bay on that list, just ever so slightly ahead of the Bills. I wonder if they were being honest in rating all aspects or where is it cold and miserable at times. I have heard time after time the praise for Bills fans and their loyalty, yet this poll doesn't seem to account for it.

  9. And its my opinion that you and many others here are over sensitive faggots, that cant take a joke.

    Well see, there you go again...more slander. Look, you asked what you said wrong, it was pointed out to you, now you are being over sensitive and calling more names. If you were to prevent yourself from making completely classless generalizing obscene remarks about someone, this sort of thing wouldn't be an issue would it? Instead of trying to increase your post count, use some restraint when necessary. Now, good day sir.

  10. Right, I am entitled to MY OPINION, it doesnt have to be right, and you dont have to agree with me.

     

    and to be honest it was a joke because Bradford is a Native American, ok there, I made alcoholic Indian joke, now everyone can flame away and say what a bad person I am for making a simple joke.

     

    Grow up and stop being so sensitive, jesus.

    You are absolutely correct...and it's my opinion that you are a douche. :censored:

  11. IDK do you like to insult strangers in real life, or just thru your computer screen.

     

    BTW what did I say that was so bad, Bradford is wafer thin, he does have an avg arm, and he did play in the spread.

     

    So what is your problem

    You can't be serious...you say Bradford is an alcoholic waiting to happen, but you don't know why someone would say you're a douche?

×
×
  • Create New...