Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  DC Tom said:
Hideous dress, though.

 

Not because it's revealing...because it's ugly.

F@g! Not that there's anything wrong with that and I'm just kidding.

Posted
  Beerball said:

 

Who cares! :w00t:

 

 

  Pete said:
!@#$ the tape, how about that ass?

 

:lol::nana:

 

  KD in CT said:
Agreed. I don't see the big deal over this chick. I'd rather bang the little blonde with the ripped jeans behind her.

 

Possibly, but she still smokin like a wildfire! :w00t:

 

 

  DC Tom said:
Hideous dress, though.

 

Not because it's revealing...because it's ugly.

 

Umm, I'd say that comment is a little fem, but it's really a lot fem, Mr. Blackwell. :nana:

Posted
  KD in CT said:
Agreed. I don't see the big deal over this chick. I'd rather bang the little blonde with the ripped jeans behind her.

 

She used to be pretty, but just like the rest of the trendy chicks in Hollywood, she looks ridiculously skinny and disgusting now.

Posted
  Peevo said:
I think she looks smokin'. Damn

 

I think she looks like crap.

 

 

  Pete said:
!@#$ the tape, how about that ass?

 

I agree. That was a surprise.

Posted
  Fatty McButterpants said:
She is too skinny. Who wants to be with a skeleton with boobs? I like a little "junk in the trunk." :thumbsup:

 

She's "Hollywood" beautiful. A big reason, IMO, that girls are bulimic or anorexic. They see these images of beauty and find themselves ugly. :devil:

 

A touch of weight is very attractive on a woman. JMO

×
×
  • Create New...