DIE HARD 1967 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 I am happy with recently signed and future Hall of Famer Derrick Jones It is amazing how we got him for nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Schobel is better than Burgess, and on about the same level as Thomas. Oh, yeah? Whip out the end-o-meter, and let's have a look. Where do Chris Ellis and Chris Kelsay fit into your metric? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Oh, yeah? Whip out the end-o-meter, and let's have a look. Where do Chris Ellis and Chris Kelsay fit into your metric? Burgess is about as good as Kelsay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperKillerRobots Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Oh, yeah? Whip out the end-o-meter, and let's have a look. Where do Chris Ellis and Chris Kelsay fit into your metric? You'd need to re-calibrate the "end-o-meter" for those two, but Schobel is definitely better than Burgess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurlyBurly51 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Burgess is about as good as Kelsay. I feel better now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloaggie Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Schobel is better than Burgess, and on about the same level as Thomas. To be honest, I think Bills fans will have to make that call after we see Schobel back this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperKillerRobots Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Burgess is about as good as Kelsay. They're different players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 To be honest, I think Bills fans will have to make that call after we see Schobel back this year. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Burgess is about as good as Kelsay. **scoffs** In Kelsay's dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 I feel better now Kelsay isn't bad. He is solid against the run, and would average 5-7 sacks a year with a premier pass rusher on the left side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGimp Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 GUYS-there is no debate here-the Pats are a better organization top to bottom. They figure out what it takes to win and go and get it. Unlike our dual pillars of continuity of the Bills and Sabres. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Kelsay isn't bad. He is solid against the run, and would average 5-7 sacks a year with a premier pass rusher on the left side. Which side? BTW, Schobel WAS a "premier" pass rusher, and Kelsay was still nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 GUYS-there is no debate here-the Pats are a better organization top to bottom. They figure out what it takes to win and go and get it. Unlike our dual pillars of continuity of the Bills and Sabres. Well duh. But let's not act like this is the acquisition of the century. They picked up a decent player coming off an injury plagued season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Which side? BTW, Schobel WAS a "premier" pass rusher, and Kelsay was still nothing. Are you that dumb, or just a new fan? Kelsay had a career high 5.5 sacks when Schobel had 14. That's good for a RDE, and obviously you don't know the difference between a LDE and a RDE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Are you that dumb, or just a new fan? You've seen his posts and you still have to ask that question. He's that dumb, all right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 Well duh. But let's not act like this is the acquisition of the century. They picked up a decent player coming off an injury plagued season. click here for "19th nervous breakdown" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely Dan Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 Just what we needed. Burgess Meh, no great loss. The Pets* overpaid for him. The guy had 2 good years on a very bad team, hopefully he will not return to his previous best while playing for the Pats. He is injury prone only playing a full season twice...does anyone know what the Pats gave up for him? What he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 Are you that dumb, or just a new fan? Kelsay had a career high 5.5 sacks when Schobel had 14. That's good for a RDE, and obviously you don't know the difference between a LDE and a RDE. Pray tell, does Schobel play RDE or LDE? Ditto Kelsay. Who said, ...He (Kelsay) is solid against the run, and would average 5-7 sacks a year with a premier pass rusher on the left side.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billistic Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 Kelsay's sack numbers, by year: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoring is not hardy Posted August 7, 2009 Share Posted August 7, 2009 This is terrible news. I'm amused by all the posters that don't think this is a big deal. The same guys would be doing cartwheels in thier front lawn if we signed this guy. Hopefully this doesn't turn out like that other disgruntled raider the pat s* signed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts