Jump to content

Souter's seat....


Recommended Posts

Three teenage black kids killed by gunfire in Compton won't draw much interest either

 

Excellent parallel!

 

Were the Compton teenagers shot by LAPD snipers? Was the Mayor of Los Angeles involved?

 

Because if this actually did happen we WOULD have a full investigation! And riots if the Mayor was a Republican!!

 

Had George Bush been in place of Barack Obama during this whole Somali pirate disaster the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, MSNBC, et al, would have been ALL OVER Bush!

 

One simple question to start the investigation: What did the Somali pirates WANT and why didn't President Obama give thm what they wanted? <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Excellent parallel!

 

Were the Compton teenagers shot by LAPD snipers? Was the Mayor of Los Angeles involved?

 

Because if this actually did happen we WOULD have a full investigation! And riots if the Mayor was a Republican!!

 

Had George Bush been in place of Barack Obama during this whole Somali pirate disaster the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, MSNBC, et al, would have been ALL OVER Bush!

 

One simple question to start the investigation: What did the Somali pirates WANT and why didn't President Obama give thm what they wanted? :oops:

So if the Columbine Killers had taken over the school and clearly had guns and bombs and the process capability to kill people, you'd have objected if the mayor said "take them out before they hurt someone!".

 

You really are a dumbass. Do you realize how stupid you sound?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if the Columbine Killers had taken over the school and clearly had guns and bombs and the process capability to kill people, you'd have objected if the mayor said "take them out before they hurt someone!".

 

You really are a dumbass. Do you realize how stupid you sound?

About as stupid as you do for actually continuing to feed the beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And another thoughtful meaningful contribution. You never disappoint.

I'm not at all surprised you'd miss the wisdom of "not feeding the trolls". You know, given that's pretty much been your primary role here. But full marks for the misguided attempt at condescension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, not to put too fine a point on things, I want to know what President Obama was doing for FOUR days to effectuate a peaceful outcome.

 

How did he fail so miserably?

 

Why do other countries and even NATO manage to end these situations peacefully almost all of the time?

 

Why did President Obama feel the need to kill starving teenagers? :oops:

 

All they wanted to do was eat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if the Columbine Killers had taken over the school and clearly had guns and bombs and the process capability to kill people, you'd have objected if the mayor said "take them out before they hurt someone!".

 

You really are a dumbass. Do you realize how stupid you sound?

 

The Columbine situation is not the same. The Columbine killers went to school to kill. The Somali pirates hijacked a ship so they could exchange it for money.

 

Then they take the money and buy food for themselves and their families.

 

What specifically did the Somali pirates want in exchange for the ship and her crew?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 4th surviving pirate, however.

 

The surviving 4th Somali pirate is supposed to be charged with piracy, etc. I'm dying to hear what he has to say in a court room via a vigorous defense attorney seeking deflection and sympathy from the jury:

 

:oops: "President Obama killed my three friends. He never even asked what we wanted for return of the ship and its crew. We're poor and hungry. The situation lasted FOUR days and got worse every day. Why did Obama kill my friends? Why are they dead? We're only TEENAGERS and we're just trying to help our hungry families!" :)

 

I'm also sure the vigorous defense attorney will drill down on the specifics of Obama's authorization, again seeking deflection.

 

Unless, of course, the White House gets involved and has the charges dropped!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not at all surprised you'd miss the wisdom of "not feeding the trolls". You know, given that's pretty much been your primary role here. But full marks for the misguided attempt at condescension.

 

I am not a troll.

 

My questions regarding the obvious deathly FAILURE of President Obama are 100% valid.

 

I keep asking them and all I receive are idiotic Thomas Jefferson, Columbine High School, Compton, etc, references!

 

Blzrul is not condenscending. It's just that my probing of Obama for the FOUR days prior to these starving teenage Somali pirates getting their heads removed from their shoulders clearly bother her!

 

She has NO answers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

...liberals just don't care when a Democrat President MURDERS people. Just let the story die off, I guess. But if a Republican President tortures terrorists?

 

http://mrssatan.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama...li-pirates.html

 

Obama Murders Teenage Somali Pirates

 

Divider...Warmonger!

 

The hostage standoff between Muslim Somali pirates and their hostage, Captain Richard Phillips, ended tragically when Barack Hussein Obama, Junior, ordered U.S. Navy Seal snipers to assassinate the pirates. Obama is a Warmonger, a charge The Left salivatingly applied in liberal doses to George W. Bush.

 

According to Bloomberg the ages of the executed pirates were ages 17 to 19. The captured pirate is 16 years old. Sixteen years old! He's just a kid and so were the other three pirates.

 

Obama ordered the execution of teenagers; children really. He must feel like a real tough guy. A real leader. A big man.

 

What's next for The Fraud From Kenya - stealing candy from children and shoving then tripping the elderly?

 

Where were the skilled negotiations from Obama, who tells us he can resolve all things peacefully? Where was "talking with the enemy"? Why the rush to such a violent ending? :cry:

 

The Left is famous for saying W. Bush didn't allow the UN enough time for inspections in Iraq despite the fact that the UN issued some - I forget the exact number - 18 or more resolutions. Why wasn't there more time allowed in order to reach a peaceful, non-violent conclusion with the teen pirates?

 

The teen pirates were simply looking for a means of sustenance. The Left is famous for asking who is America to impose our value system, morals or standards of behavior on those who have virtually nothing to eat, no shelter, little clothing?

 

The teen pirates were only looking for a way to improve their lot in life. Their choice of piracy may not have been the best choice, but did Obama need to kill three teen-aged Muslims?

 

In a moment where greatness was required, Obama resorted to the brutal execution of three teenagers. :bag:

 

Who are we to do this? We are America, and Obama aggressively promotes his brand of American Imperialism around the world - something The Left spent the past eight years defining as unacceptable behavior.

 

What about the due process of the teen pirates? What about their civil liberties? What about their right to Habeas Corpus? Oh, The Left would be raising all these issues had teen pirates been executed by a Republican president. But Obama receives the Coveted Free Pass.

 

If we have learned anything from The Left, it is that bullying, warfare and militaristic confrontation is not the answer to conflict. The answer is talking and negotiation. Where was this during the teen pirate stand-off? AWOL.

 

The dead teen pirates are more examples of Obama's American Imperialism. He is in the driver's seat. Nothing has changed. Obama continues the mode of why the world hates us; we are the aggressor. Blame America, it's our fault. It is our fault, I wholeheartedly agree with the Liberals this time.

 

Where was the outreach from The Community Organizer In Chief to the pirates? Where was his compassion for the below poverty level of existence for the teen pirates? The pirates were just trying to put food on the table for their families. Sure, piracy is wrong, but who are we to judge it using only our own limited and narrow standards? :lol:

 

Perhaps we need to work harder, much harder, in order to understand and accept the culture and tradition of the downtrodden pirates who are simply trying to better their lives. Chances are they chose piracy because it's the only avenue for their existence.

 

Obama's execution of the teen pirates is already fomenting more acts of aggression against the United States and our presence around the world. American Imperialism is what it is, and it is what the world hates.

 

Obama's execution of the teen pirates has resulted in Somali pirates - most likely teenagers - seizing four ships in the past 24 hours.

 

Obama's order that allowed the ruthless slaughter of these unfortunate civilian causalities has already caused a new wave of pirate attacks.

 

Obama's actions assures only more aggression and violence directed at us. And all of this is our fault. America is to blame. Obama is to blame. It's his fault....all his fault.

 

The teen pirate episode does not, in any way, reflect a Obama success in passing any "test". He gave the order to shoot and kill teenagers while the murder rate in his home base of the south side of Chicago continues skyrocketing.

 

I haven't checked, but if it's not out there already, it's only a matter of time until some Obama Cultists blame the Somali Teen Pirate episode on their wild conspiracy theory of Dick Cheney's Shadow Presidency:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...