Jump to content

The Distribution of Income


Recommended Posts

not at all. If the rich have all the money the average person couldn't buy cars and all the auto workers would lose their jobs. So we have Progressive [i.e. very good] taxation which re-distributes the wealth so the economy can keep going around.

 

Is this a joke? Anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

not at all. If the rich have all the money the average person couldn't buy cars and all the auto workers would lose their jobs. So we have Progressive [i.e. very good] taxation which re-distributes the wealth so the economy can keep going around.

 

after reading this, i no longer think you ate paint chips as a kid. I now think your mom gave you lead based paint in place of milk in your cereal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after reading this, i no longer think you ate paint chips as a kid. I now think your mom gave you lead based paint in place of milk in your cereal.

All three of you are such morons. Can at least one of you clowns make a counter argument? Two of you I understand can't, but Tom I would expect you could show something of an argument. Perhaps it's that I'm so obviously right you can't touch me. I figured one of you would throw out some right wing talking point for me to debunk at least but you all are even too afraid to do that. Fugging pussies! :wallbash: Really, stupid fugging pussies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All three of you are such morons. Can at least one of you clowns make a counter argument? Two of you I understand can't, but Tom I would expect you could show something of an argument. Perhaps it's that I'm so obviously right you can't touch me. I figured one of you would throw out some right wing talking point for me to debunk at least but you all are even too afraid to do that. Fugging pussies! :wallbash: Really, stupid fugging pussies

Thing is ramius and I don't see eye to eye on a lot of this stuff because he is a liberal hack as well. However, he isn't a retarded political hack which puts him up a few steps from most liberal hacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All three of you are such morons. Can at least one of you clowns make a counter argument? Two of you I understand can't, but Tom I would expect you could show something of an argument. Perhaps it's that I'm so obviously right you can't touch me. I figured one of you would throw out some right wing talking point for me to debunk at least but you all are even too afraid to do that. Fugging pussies! :wallbash: Really, stupid fugging pussies

I would, but I don't even know where to start after reading your last couple posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is ramius and I don't see eye to eye on a lot of this stuff because he is a liberal hack as well. However, he isn't a retarded political hack which puts him up a few steps from most liberal hacks.

No, I'm sure Ramius is just seconds away from whipping out the "right wing talking points." :wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a joke? :wallbash:

 

Of course not. He's living the high life of government wealth distribution. Just think of the boom that will come with the new court house building. It will follow the big party at the local Chevy dealers, as they welcome the checks the IRS sends them to allow the commoners to buy cars, so they don't have to blighten good neighborhoods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured one of you would throw out some right wing talking point for me to debunk at least but you all are even too afraid to do that.

 

You're going to be waiting a while then. The reason i dont care to support some of my views on here is that retards like you give dems a bad name. Frankly, i'd rather be quiet and be lumped in with the right than lumped in with an idiot like yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're going to be waiting a while then. The reason i dont care to support some of my views on here is that retards like you give dems a bad name. Frankly, i'd rather be quiet and be lumped in with the right than lumped in with an idiot like yourself.

 

Of course, being lumped in with the right means being lumped in with Holcomb's Arm. Pick your poison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're going to be waiting a while then. The reason i dont care to support some of my views on here is that retards like you give dems a bad name. Frankly, i'd rather be quiet and be lumped in with the right than lumped in with an idiot like yourself.

Then why even respond? My point is so obviously true and simple, I am pretty surprised anyone would challange it--with insults, not counterarguments, btw. That I'm being called an idiot by you for stating a basic fact of how our government and economy interreact successfully says more about you than me. Your response tells me you simply don't know very much. Carry on with your ignorant insults

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why even respond? My point is so obviously true and simple, I am pretty surprised anyone would challange it--with insults, not counterarguments, btw. That I'm being called an idiot by you for stating a basic fact of how our government and economy interreact successfully says more about you than me. Your response tells me you simply don't know very much. Carry on with your ignorant insults

 

This is still a joke, right? Can you honestly look at federal income and expenditures and tell anyone that the government robs from the rich and gives to the poor? Have you ever paid any attention to what the federal government does?

 

Hell, did you pay attention to my earlier posts? My salary is generated via that redistribution of wealth. I'm taxed at an exorbitant rate. Those taxes are redistributed to the company I work for. That company pays my salary. My salary is then taxed at an exorbitant rate. And you would easily consider me wealthy. And I'm a very small example of how the government works - look at the contracts for the LCS or how HUD works sometime. The government resdistributes wealth to the wealthy, not the poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...