Kelly the Dog Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Yes, you do keep saying that, and while I agree that if a deal is made for Turner it will not be a for a 1st and a 3rd, but AJ could have put many different tenders on him, including one that would have been closer to the actual asking price he was willing to take. (if it's not really a 1 and 3) Why put a 1st and 3rd tender on him if he was willing to take a second anyway? He would have had much more interest that way. More than likely I could be wrong, but I think it's going to take more than a 2nd to get him. Because he sets the stakes high and he can keep Turner at that level as long as he wants. He can trade him at any time for anything. Maybe someone bites. Maybe someone offers a first. But also, if he tenders him at a second rounder he doesn't get to choose where Turner goes. This way was much smarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAF911 Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Let him collect dust on the bench. After the draft his trade value diminishes. No need to rush into any stupid one-sided deals...Like the deal for Matt Shaub!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Because he sets the stakes high and he can keep Turner at that level as long as he wants. He can trade him at any time for anything. Maybe someone bites. Maybe someone offers a first. But also, if he tenders him at a second rounder he doesn't get to choose where Turner goes. This way was much smarter. Pretty straight forward, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generaLee83 Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 Some people say that is a good description of me! That's why you're so special, K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts