molson_golden2002 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Self-fulfilling prophecy. Now even if the intel is dead-nuts accurate, you'll still accuse it of being cooked. Basically under NO circumstances are you willing to admit Iran might be a threat. Which is fine. Just so you realize it's intellectually dishonest. He is still right, posting garbage about some claric in Australia doesn't prove anything about Iran. Your the one being intellictually dishonest there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 He is still right, posting garbage about some claric in Australia doesn't prove anything about Iran. Your the one being intellictually dishonest there. Can you read? Or do you just choose not to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Coli Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Self-fulfilling prophecy. Now even if the intel is dead-nuts accurate, you'll still accuse it of being cooked. Basically under NO circumstances are you willing to admit Iran might be a threat. Which is fine. Just so you realize it's intellectually dishonest. The same could be said of this administration, who seem hell-bent on manufacturing a war with Iran. Even if the intel is dead-nuts accurate saying Iran isn't the immediate threat they say it is (and the declassified portion of the NIE says as much wrt Iraq), they'll still use what bits of it that does support their claim in their rush to war. Basically under NO circumstances are they willing to admit Iran might not be a threat. Self-fulfilling prophecy indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Like linking to an article about a muslim cleric in Australia suggesting that rape victims deserve it, in a thread about cooking the intelligence that will be used to go to war with Iran? Actually it Molson who, one post in, shifted to the subject of his man-crush on the guy at the gym and how he was muttering "That guy should be in jail!" as the tv showed some sinister looking muslim man over and over again. What does that have to do with intelligence at Iran? There is that liberal bias again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollywood Donahoe Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 Can you read? Or do you just choose not to? I don't know about reading, but we know he can't spell: ...claric...Your...intellictually... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts