marauderswr80 Posted January 26, 2007 Share Posted January 26, 2007 If Marv gave his word saying he wouldnt tag Nate, we know Marv wont go back on his word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted January 26, 2007 Share Posted January 26, 2007 It's nice to know he and the Bills haven't even been in contact. He's gone guys. We ain't even gonna try, in true Buffalo Bills fashion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted January 26, 2007 Share Posted January 26, 2007 I have one question that always bothered me regarding the tagging of Nate Clements last year: When Nate was tagged last year, why didn't any team jump up to make him an offer and negotiate with the Bills about a compensation. I agree that the basic tag was a 1st and 3rd or 2 1st rounders....But if there was a team that was desperate for CB help would have approached the Bills about getting him via a sign and trade (like Peerless Price). After all, a team like Seattle gave up a 1st rounder to a above average WR (as Hollywood Donahoe put it) in Deion Branch and gave him a 40M contract, why didn't any team step up to the plate at least to even look at that option.... I am sure the Bills would have gladly uploaded Clements if they were going to get a 1st or 2nd round pick back rather than carry a 7.5M CB on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts