ieatcrayonz Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 I think Marv had one drop into his lap here and let's hope he realizes it. With Jeff Sjfdgjhja from Notre Dame saying he is going to play baseball we can make a slick move. Here is what we do: When the 6th round pops up, we trade our pick to Dallas for TO. There is no way he and Parcells can co-exist. By itself this move makes no sense because TO can be a distraction at times and isn't always motivated. But when the 7th round comes up we can pick Smdfjhgsfdja. This way we can always hold a threat over TO and keep him motivated. When TO wants to retire, we can get Smdjhsa back because he will have flopped at baseball by then. Even if it doesn't work out we only lose a 6th and 7th. Sometimes you have to roll the dice to get the big payoff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 I think Marv had one drop into his lap here and let's hope he realizes it. With Jeff Sjfdgjhja from Notre Dame saying he is going to play baseball we can make a slick move. Here is what we do: When the 6th round pops up, we trade our pick to Dallas for TO. There is no way he and Parcells can co-exist. By itself this move makes no sense because TO can be a distraction at times and isn't always motivated. But when the 7th round comes up we can pick Smdfjhgsfdja. This way we can always hold a threat over TO and keep him motivated. When TO wants to retire, we can get Smdjhsa back because he will have flopped at baseball by then. Even if it doesn't work out we only lose a 6th and 7th. Sometimes you have to roll the dice to get the big payoff. i dunno if i should call this plan idiotic or genious? But I will call you an incredibly idiotic genious for suggesting that we get TO, but thinking dallas would give him away for a 6th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBilliever Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 Marv and T.O. can't co-exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 I don't know about that plan, but what about spending a 6th rounder on Smfhsfasjejia in the hopes he changes his mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 Like what's his name w/ the Texas and Michigan and the Yankees and the Cowboys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 Why in the world would you want either one of these guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted January 20, 2007 Author Share Posted January 20, 2007 Why in the world would you want either one of these guys? Now that he is further on in his career, TO will gladly accept being a #2 receiver, especially to a quiet guy like Lee. In Dallas, it is all about Parcells trying to out do him in the press. TO is in it for the championships if he comes to Buffalo. Smsdfgjyfa is a bit of leverage we need on TO in case he gets antsy and also he's a low risk/high return. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenews Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 Ted Ginn!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted January 20, 2007 Share Posted January 20, 2007 One let me just say we dont need a wide reciever and i don't want T.O. if everyone is so intent on picking a wide out im ok with taking smardza or whatever his name is in the 6th rd or something. if it doesnt work it doesnt work. but i dont think marv'll do it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted January 20, 2007 Author Share Posted January 20, 2007 One let me just say we dont need a wide reciever and i don't want T.O. if everyone is so intent on picking a wide out im ok with taking smardza or whatever his name is in the 6th rd or something. if it doesnt work it doesnt work. but i dont think marv'll do it I suggest taking TO in the 6th and Smxghja in the 7th and you say no, let's take Smxjdgha in the 6th but not take TO. Who do you take in the 7th? A long snapper? That is better than TO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 I don't know about that plan, but what about spending a 6th rounder on Smfhsfasjejia in the hopes he changes his mind? He may not need to change his mind...MLB is NEVER a given...ever...99 MPH Fastball or not, the Kid's ERA was barely under 4.00 in College...I know they (the Cubs) feel he'll excell with only Baseball to concentrate on, and they may be right...But He would not be the 1st Guy with a great fastball to flop in the Bigs...Or in AAA for that matter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 He may not need to change his mind...MLB is NEVER a given...ever...99 MPH Fastball or not, the Kid's ERA was barely under 4.00 in College...I know they (the Cubs) feel he'll excell with only Baseball to concentrate on, and they may be right...But He would not be the 1st Guy with a great fastball to flop in the Bigs...Or in AAA for that matter... Yep. Wasn't Henson considered a top prospect as well, and he was a QB. I'd say it's worth a pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeF Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 This is brilliant....better conceived than the majority of the predictions on this board. Thank you for adding intelligence and insight into the world of insane predictions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts