ExWNYer Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Nice call and plug for TBD...Howard gave the site some nice props! Good job, Brandon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnarb Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 ssshh! I'm supposed to have a life! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 ssshh! I'm supposed to have a life! 62193[/snapback] What'd you say/ask? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 So, c'mon Brandon. What'd you tell them, what'd you tell them? Wait! Let me guess. We need to start playing Losman, even with a broken leg! No, wait. Donahoe is a pinhead and has no clue how to draft! No, wait. McNally is wasting our time! No, wait. Mularky is a bust as a head coach after three games! No, wait. Holding calls in quick running plays are stupid! No, wait. Okay...I give... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted October 8, 2004 Author Share Posted October 8, 2004 ssshh! I'm supposed to have a life! 62193[/snapback] Your very presence on this board and the 'Simoncast' suggests otherwise! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnarb Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Paco, you must be confusing me with a reactionary schithead. I don't think those things of our coaches or tom donahoe. I have some issues with a few of our players, but... i said that tom clements and mularkey called a good game against the pats. if you watch the playcalling, they did a nice job of keeping them guessing. It's the players that have lost these three games. The coaching is much better than it is last year. We've heard a million times how the players are making it hard on themselves at critical times, and it's true. I merely suggested that if it happens again, the bills will enter that danger zone where they could actually *believe* that they're cursed. That's extremely hard to undo psychologically once it sets. If the Bills don't win, I hope they get BLOWN OUT so there's no thinking that they were the better team but were again cursed with bad luck or bad timing. But the bills won't lose. Bills 27, Jets 20 or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 So, c'mon Brandon. What'd you tell them, what'd you tell them? Wait! Let me guess. We need to start playing Losman, even with a broken leg! No, wait. Donahoe is a pinhead and has no clue how to draft! No, wait. McNally is wasting our time! No, wait. Mularky is a bust as a head coach after three games! No, wait. Holding calls in quick running plays are stupid! No, wait. Okay...I give... 62198[/snapback] He said......"This Paco at TBD is a light in the loafers, fried banana sandwich eating IGMO." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Paco, you must be confusing me with a reactionary schithead. I don't think those things of our coaches or tom donahoe. I have some issues with a few of our players, but... i said that tom clements and mularkey called a good game against the pats. if you watch the playcalling, they did a nice job of keeping them guessing. It's the players that have lost these three games. The coaching is much better than it is last year. We've heard a million times how the players are making it hard on themselves at critical times, and it's true. I merely suggested that if it happens again, the bills will enter that danger zone where they could actually *believe* that they're cursed. That's extremely hard to undo psychologically once it sets. If the Bills don't win, I hope they get BLOWN OUT so there's no thinking that they were the better team but were again cursed with bad luck or bad timing. But the bills won't lose. Bills 27, Jets 20 or something like that. 62251[/snapback] Sorry, Nod. I absolutely did not mean to infer those were your views. I've read your views and I know you always approach the games with a level-head. It was meant to be a tongue-in-cheek synopsis of all the "reactionary schithead" views posted since the last game. Sorry 'bout that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 He said......"This Paco at TBD is a light in the loafers, fried banana sandwich eating IGMO." 62254[/snapback] HEYYY!!! I don't eat fried banana sandwich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 HEYYY!!!I don't eat fried banana sandwich. 62278[/snapback] LOL......but I do like fried ice cream..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Stop talking about food, guys. You're making me hungry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Stop talking about food, guys. You're making me hungry. 62305[/snapback] Hide the kids! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Kids were for lunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted October 8, 2004 Share Posted October 8, 2004 Kids were for lunch. 62311[/snapback] Appetizer? Baby. The Other Other White Meat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnarb Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 Sorry, Nod. I absolutely did not mean to infer those were your views. I've read your views and I know you always approach the games with a level-head. It was meant to be a tongue-in-cheek synopsis of all the "reactionary schithead" views posted since the last game. Sorry 'bout that. 62277[/snapback] ain't no thang, brudda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 Paco, you must be confusing me with a reactionary schithead. I don't think those things of our coaches or tom donahoe. I have some issues with a few of our players, but... i said that tom clements and mularkey called a good game against the pats. if you watch the playcalling, they did a nice job of keeping them guessing. It's the players that have lost these three games. The coaching is much better than it is last year. We've heard a million times how the players are making it hard on themselves at critical times, and it's true. I merely suggested that if it happens again, the bills will enter that danger zone where they could actually *believe* that they're cursed. That's extremely hard to undo psychologically once it sets. If the Bills don't win, I hope they get BLOWN OUT so there's no thinking that they were the better team but were again cursed with bad luck or bad timing. But the bills won't lose. Bills 27, Jets 20 or something like that. 62251[/snapback] Caught it. Nice "this season is turning into an X-File" reference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts