The Jokeman Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I know. Teams weren't even willing to give up a 1st rounder for a guy like Sean Alexander or even a starting QB like Culpepper. Branch???? he's pretty good but gimme a break. 769665[/snapback] It's probably going to end up being a late 1st Rounder ie picks 20-32 which in recent years have been hit or miss type picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Seahawks didn't sepnd too much on Burleson. The contract reads seven-year for $49 million, but the last three years are basically bogus. Burleson's contract should be viewed as four-year for $14.5 million dollars. He has no chance to see the last three years of the contract which worth $34.5 million. Here is his salary per year from NFLPA: 2006: 1,250,000 2007: 2,750,000 2008: 3,250,000 2009: 3,250,000 2010: 10,500,000 2011: 12,000,000 2012: 12,000,000 769966[/snapback] thanks..I figured it was something like this..but I am extermely too lazy to find the info.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 What did we get for Moulds? Basically once the season started and teams saw a clear need for a position they were willing to give up more. As Seattle is having a problem at WR now they saw a clear need to make an upgrade. It is kind of ironic that the Pats have a huge need there as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I know. Teams weren't even willing to give up a 1st rounder for a guy like Sean Alexander or even a starting QB like Culpepper. Branch???? he's pretty good but gimme a break. 769665[/snapback] What bothers more is that they gave a 40M contract to a WR who is going to be the 2nd WR on the team and did not pay a similar contract to their starting Guard from last year....Absence of Hutchison showed what this team is going to miss this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffan00 Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 What bothers more is that they gave a 40M contract to a WR who is going tobe the 2nd WR on the team and did not pay a similar contract to their starting Guard from last year....Absence of Hutchison showed what this team is going to miss this season. 770605[/snapback] I know..pretty odd they used their money that way!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 What did we get for Moulds? Basically once the season started and teams saw a clear need for a position they were willing to give up more. As Seattle is having a problem at WR now they saw a clear need to make an upgrade. It is kind of ironic that the Pats have a huge need there as well. 770566[/snapback] Also they could have got Donte Stallworth for much less and a smaller contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts