TPS Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Libertarians? I'll be honest, I've only heard him on one issue, so I'll have to read up on him at their web site, but I'm leaning toward voting for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Sad thing is that neither Bush nor Kerry will pay attention after they get in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted September 30, 2004 Author Share Posted September 30, 2004 Sad thing is that neither Bush nor Kerry will pay attention after they get in 50682[/snapback] The parties will pay attention when more and more people start sending them a message by voting for alternatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 The parties will pay attention when more and more people start sending them a message by voting for alternatives. 50771[/snapback] Except that's not going to happen because people aren't concerned about what their party's DO, only what they SAY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimshiz Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Except that's not going to happen because people aren't concerned about what their party's DO, only what they SAY. 51053[/snapback] This is not true. Even in the cases where the leaders don't "DO" the party line, we are still better off than going with the other party simply because of what the other party says they will "DO". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 This is not true. Even in the cases where the leaders don't "DO" the party line, we are still better off than going with the other party simply because of what the other party says they will "DO". I certainly agree with that statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 This is not true. Even in the cases where the leaders don't "DO" the party line, we are still better off than going with the other party simply because of what the other party says they will "DO". 51077[/snapback] That attitude is pretty much the reason we're in the quandry today. Thanks for proving the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted September 30, 2004 Share Posted September 30, 2004 Libertarians? I'll be honest, I've only heard him on one issue, so I'll have to read up on him at their web site, but I'm leaning toward voting for him. 50665[/snapback] Libertarians on Issues Good for you for thinking outside the box. Unfortunately, I myself am moving back into the box. I'm a registered Libertarian who is NOT voting for Badnarik in November. I don't think the party understands foreign policy. Issues like immigration control, the war on terror, and international commerce are way more complex than what the party makes them out to be. Libertarians are isolationists, and isolationism is no longer a viable policy for a country that wants to thrive in today's world - one where every country and culture is now interconnected, whether we like it or not. Anyway, that's my little rant on the Libertarian party but you are obviously welcome to form your own opinion of them. I am reluctantly voting for Bush on November 2. What are all the rest of you Libertarians thinking? I know there are at least a few roaming around the PPP board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts