beerme1 Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 To me it is all about filling roles..... I dont think Edwards fit into our plans anymore because Tripplet is now filling the role he had.....while Anderson will be the 3rd guy in rotation.... The problem is we haven't addressed the anchor DT role....but I assume we will. 643841[/snapback] Ok but, we supposedly offered him a contract, which to me means they felt he did fit into our plans. Not saying that I think he fit into our plans, but they did. Somehow. Why though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 Horrible against the run. I am very glad he's gone actually. That experiment failed four or five years in a row. 643270[/snapback] Thank You. Ron Edwards = Fools gold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 He shows flashes of brilliance and 9 plays out of 10 he basically stinks. Horrible against the run. I am very glad he's gone actually. That experiment failed four or five years in a row. 643270[/snapback] I agree. He did not step it up when needed to shine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted March 28, 2006 Share Posted March 28, 2006 This guy hasnt been healthy in quite a while, its hard to pay a guy when he tackles the trainer more than a running back. Good riddens we need someone in there that wants to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts