Andy1 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I took the part that you put in quotes, but edited my post my post to add in the full sentences you posted. I am not sure that matters, but I certainly don't want to project the way I feel you and Tibs have. I now understand that you think I was equating Biden pardoning certain people with the horrific nature of Epstein's crimes. I have no idea how you arrived at that, whether you thought I was writing in secret code, or if I just typed the wrong words and you noodled it all out. That's for you to figure out---I didn't mention Epstein. I did not assume the people Biden pardoned are involved with Epstein in any way, shape or form. I would have said that if I did. I didn't. I hope that is clear to you now. Though, now that you (not me) have brought it up, it would not surprise me if any of those people pardoned--his brother, dopey son, Faucci---were involved with Epstein, who seems to cater to wealthy and famous people. Other notable wealthy and famous people I am not assuming are involved, but would not surprise to hear that they were: You know what, I started typing names and it's easier to just say the following: -Any A+ list actor or celebrity; -Any upper echelon politician from any party; -Any member of the UN; -Any powerful manager of money -lots more people It’s easy to misinterpret people on this forum. You originally mentioned the horse being out of the barn with Biden in response to my comment about Trump with Epstein. That seems to me that you are mixing two different issues together and calling them one. You may see it differently. So be it. That’s what makes this forum interesting is interacting with others who view life differently than us. That’s America in a nutshell. I do agree with you that there were likely a lot of wealthy, powerful men involved. Men who are socially inept and lacking women in their lives, or who liked the power part over a minor who went to Epstein. They were likely from both parties and and all sorts of businesses and finance. The financial backers of both parties are probably in the files. I still remember 6th grade in Catholic school when the nun told us “you can fool some of the people all the time, and all the people some of the time, but never all the people all the time”. And she was talking about a kid chewing gum in class, but it still applies in life. It’s time these dirtbag men with tiny peckers are exposed for their actions. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Delete_Delete_Delete said: Um yes, I think they still wield an ungodly amount of power within their party, and Hillary has suffered enough humiliation to last 100 lifetimes between Bill, and then being embarrassed by Trump. Why would they want anything about Bill and possible relations with underage women to see the light of day? After what she did to Bernie, blatantly using her power to steal an entire presidential nomination from the rightful nominee, why would she not continue to use her and Bill’s sway to prevent this stuff from ever getting out? I think she wants to preserve what’s left of their “legacy” and if Bill is all over those files, then all they have to leave behind is decades of scandal to the very bitter end. I understand this is speculative, but it’s more just connecting obvious dots. Trump isn’t supposed to be like “most people in politics”, remember, that was his entire platform he ran on back in 2016. BTW, the whole “TDS” thing is about as cool as the “Let’s Go Brandon” stuff. I mean by all means continue to use it in every other sentence, it’s an excellent counterpoint to apparently everything judging by your posts… I admire your commitment to the bit though, even got it in your screen name there, that’s cute. Bro it's a message board. You're not convincing anyone of anything. But thanks for the essay! 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Niagara Bill said: We all have some things we regret or found ourselves in situations we wish we were not. I am unsure whether trump was in the league of Epstein, but likely he was there, and should he have blown a whistle, 20 yrs later the answer is different. What other more powerful people were there? This is bigger than trump...it caused Epstein to commit suicide on orders or he was done in! Who knows. Trump maybe to. The whole espionage scene is filled with degenerates and has been forever, look at the British spies in MI6, and this is money laundering, spy stuff. Over trumps head. He was not trustworthy enough to be involved deeply. His mouth could never be trusted. Look we all have been there and made choices, but we were perhaps still in that location and did nothing. But IMHO, this runs much deeper than trump. People we don't know. Hell do you think Bill C only got 1 bj in his life. Or Bill Gates, or Musk, or 20 other billionaires. I suspect we shall never know...too bad... There’s a lot to unpack here, but i get the gist of what you’re saying. I’m reminded of this exchange between Chuck Schumer and liberal host Rachel Maddow. I found it chilling on many levels, especially in light of the Mueller probe and the insertion of the 51 former intelligence experts into the Biden laptop scandal. Here’s a NY Senator proudly declaring that the IC has multiple ways to “get” someone, and a the dopey commentator nodding right along with him. Is this the sort of thing you’re referencing?
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 42 minutes ago, Andy1 said: It’s easy to misinterpret people on this forum. You originally mentioned the horse being out of the barn with Biden in response to my comment about Trump with Epstein. That seems to me that you are mixing two different issues together and calling them one. You may see it differently. So be it. That’s what makes this forum interesting is interacting with others who view life differently than us. That’s America in a nutshell. I do agree with you that there were likely a lot of wealthy, powerful men involved. Men who are socially inept and lacking women in their lives, or who liked the power part over a minor who went to Epstein. They were likely from both parties and and all sorts of businesses and finance. The financial backers of both parties are probably in the files. I still remember 6th grade in Catholic school when the nun told us “you can fool some of the people all the time, and all the people some of the time, but never all the people all the time”. And she was talking about a kid chewing gum in class, but it still applies in life. It’s time these dirtbag men with tiny peckers are exposed for their actions. I don’t think the miscreants in the Epstein saga was limited to men, it’s too big. As for the rest, fair enough. I went to Catholic school as well, tgise nuns ran a tight ship.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I don’t think the miscreants in the Epstein saga was limited to men, it’s too big. As for the rest, fair enough. I went to Catholic school as well, tgise nuns ran a tight ship. Me too. Very thankful that my parents sent me. a great educational and moral foundation. I can’t see any of my parochial teachers seeing moral relativism in the Epstein story. I’m certain they would want every culpable villain found and punished. So do I.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Me too. Very thankful that my parents sent me. a great educational and moral foundation. I can’t see any of my parochial teachers seeing moral relativism in the Epstein story. I’m certain they would want every culpable villain found and punished. So do I. Me too. One of the byproducts of my education was to think freely and pay attention. I’m not certain history looks kindly on 1960s Catholic Institutions and moral dilemmas, as painful as that is for me to acknowledge. 1
Recommended Posts