Jump to content

Howard Simon agree with me


Recommended Posts

Maybe Howard used your cap page when putting this article together. :D

247150[/snapback]

 

It doesn't look like it as there still is a slight ($9 million from HS vs. 7.9 for CP) between what they say.

 

Much of this difference (as well as the differences between thos who seem to swear by the Bills' Daily figure of 12-14 million and thus bad mouth the CP figure) here seems to me to be a tempest in a teapot.

 

The differences are important once we get down the line abit and TD attempts to make the plans reality. However:

 

1. All figures have the same general lesson as whether you subscribe to Howard's $9 million, CP's $ roughly 8 million, or Saslow's $14 million the general conclusion is the same that TD has done a great job with the cap part of his work (though a lousy job with the team W/L). When you compare where we were before, the fact that many teams will actually have to cut a lot of vets to even make the cap, or the fairly mininiscule numbers for teams like NE that at last have a little surplus we are in good shape. The key TD number is actually that we have so many players under contract and only two starters we have to worry about as other teams like Seattle may have a lot of cap room but have been choosing whether to franchise Jones, OR, Hasselback, OR Alexander. This is the key assessment here and though the differences merit discussion they do not change the general assessment.

 

2. The differences in estimates make no difference what we need to do with particular players. MW will have to be resructured significantly whether you subscribe to $8, 14, or $9. He needs to be restructured in a big way because his play has not been up to what a top OL player should get regardless of the amount you choose and we have not hear much about him doing this. Again, it will makea difference how difficult or really difficult this is to do depending on whether his hit is $9.17 or $6.17 million. however, we are not even at that point yet because there is no public discussion of the fact that we will have a hard time justifing a salary of even $5 million (or much less given RT pay rates around the league) for him. The same is true for JJ as the market for him is uncertain and paying him an amount very far above the $3 million cap hit of Shelton if we were to pick him up is going to make it hard for us to get new LG talent.

 

So inessence, folks disagree but as Rodney King asked, why can't we all just get along. The disputes here are about important numbers that may determine how hard it will be do to do things, but not over what we should do regardless of which number you pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either way it's too damn much!  :(

247492[/snapback]

 

Exactly, the exact amount of his hit matters a lot once we have a since that there is an answer to the question of whether he is restructuring. However, in the absence of any clear idea whether he is restructuring or not arguomg about the level of his cap hit is like debating between whether it is better to wear the green evening dress or the blue evening dress to the Titanic sinking. The question of whether his hit is 6 or 9 is secondary its too much and he needs to restructure in a big way.

 

Same with JJ. If his new contract is new contract is 7 million or 5 million it makes it very hard to buy a better LG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...