LabattBlue Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 His cap number is ridiculous. If he refuses to restructure, do you cut him and look for a veteran alternative in FA? I do! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 His cap number is ridiculous. If he refuses to restructure, do you cut him and look for a veteran alternative in FA? I do! 192615[/snapback] Notwithstanding the poor games he has had, I think we need to keep him with a re-structured (read 'cheap') contract. We should use Moulds are the 3rd/critical/clutch WR and take away the responsibility as the #1 WR. He will perform much better in that role. And Evans should be #1 next year with a new #2. Cut Josh Reed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 Notwithstanding the poor games he has had, I think we need to keep him with a re-structured (read 'cheap') contract. We should use Moulds are the 3rd/critical/clutch WR and take away the responsibility as the #1 WR. He will perform much better in that role. And Evans should be #1 next year with a new #2. Cut Josh Reed. 192624[/snapback] If Moulds stays at a restructured rate, he can still be the #2, but even the most diehard Reed fans from his college days(ME) agree that it is time to let him go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 If Moulds stays at a restructured rate, he can still be the #2, but even the most diehard Reed fans from his college days(ME) agree that it is time to let him go! 192690[/snapback] Either way, we need to get a Lofton-type game breaker. Not sure if Evans is that guy, but if he is then a possession-type receiver will be needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts