Sisyphean Bills Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Each week Kelsay gets worse and worse Funny moment was when the guy on the Bills network was verbally genuflecting and slob kabobing on Kelsay for a great play and then Murph threw in, "that was Troup on that play." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Who cares at this point? We're not going to the playoffs do why not get a high pick? PTR Because we will end up with a long holdout or a terrible reach and draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdub Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 How is attempting a FG "playing for a tie"? Because they were almost 10 yards out of Lindell's range. 3 Rushes may get that 10 yards, but considering the wind today, there's a good chance he would have missed again. Nevertheless, one or 2 rushes would have been a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleaky72 Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Funny moment was when the guy on the Bills network was verbally genuflecting and slob kabobing on Kelsay for a great play and then Murph threw in, "that was Troup on that play." Even though it is funny it is quite depressing that these butt kissers would actually try and prop up Christie Kelsay. Unbelievable! What a disgraceful organization Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Because they were almost 10 yards out of Lindell's range. 3 Rushes may get that 10 yards, but considering the wind today, there's a good chance he would have missed again. Nevertheless, one or 2 rushes would have been a good idea. I didn't take it that he meant they'd just be kneel downs to keep the FG attempt out of range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PulseStart Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Ahhh, nothing like unrequited love! And FYI, it's "we're" Oh I'm so proud of the word police...bet you think you're sorta smart now. Guess what you're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofiba Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 How is attempting a FG "playing for a tie"? Settling for a 57 yard field goal after your kicker missed a 53 yarder just so you make sure you still get a tie if he misses it is playing for a tie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Even though it is funny it is quite depressing that these butt kissers would actually try and prop up Christie Kelsay. Unbelievable! What a disgraceful organization I was actually thinking that Kelsay had made a great play. They sucked me in on that one. I should've known. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Not defending the play calling, but playing for a tie when you are 0-6 would make me more mad. Hope every game they play goes deep into over-time so some of these bums can earn their paychecks. That is NOT playing for a tie - it's playing to win and playing smart - and not giving the opponent the chance to steal a win if you aren't successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdub Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 I didn't take it that he meant they'd just be kneel downs to keep the FG attempt out of range. I know. Considering the situation, the Chefs should have been expecting run, and considering how the bills had been running all day, except for a few nice plays, they probably wouldn't have made enough yardage to set up even a marginally probable field goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 Settling for a 57 yard field goal after your kicker missed a 53 yarder just so you make sure you still get a tie if he misses it is playing for a tie. Whatever. They should've run the ball and, yes, with the intention of picking up yardage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofiba Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 That is NOT playing for a tie - it's playing to win and playing smart - and not giving the opponent the chance to steal a win if you aren't successful. But if Chan truly thought he had a better chance of winning with those calls, then it was smart thinking. Who cares of your percentage of losing goes up (compared to a tie) if you are increasing your chance to actually win the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nasty Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 what???? Explain to me how he lost us the game. an INT at the end of regulation when we were already in field goal range, and taking a sack in the overtime when we had another shot at a field goal. Did you watch the same game I did, or are you a Fitz lover and just overlooked those two plays? You think Edwards would have done better? Fitz didnt lose that by himself. The D sucks a$$ The D didn't throw that INT in fact the D gave the O a chance to win by stopping the Chiefs and Fitz blew it. Chan Gailey is AWFUL Chan is not awful, he was a little too aggressive but he did that because he thought he had a smart enough QB to make the right decisions. Yes I think we should have run the ball more especially with 3 time outs and pretty much in field goal range already, but he wasn't the one who threw the INT no was he Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stenbar Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 right...I can't believe Fitz let the Chiefs run for over 200 yards...and missed a FG? Clearly all of Fitz's fault Fitz didnt lose the game..He giftwrapped it to them when he had a chance to win the game..lol..He is a good backup..If they go in to next yr with him as the qb they better have the 78 Steelers defense if they expect to win a game..Edwards sucked Fizpatrick is slightly better. Together its still a joke to have these 2 as your qbs in the NFL... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts