BuffaloBlood Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 The only QB this year I like is Bradford. If somehow someway he gets past STL and is on the board when Washington picks at 5 then I say the Bills make a play for him if the price is right. How about offer them our 4th next year to move up from 9 to 5? I know that isnt what the value chart says but it would compensate them and give them back one of the picks they traded away to get McNabb. We could then go ahead and draft Bradford. Then..... and sorry if im going trade wild in a league that is notorious for not haveing many trades.... but then we could take our 2nd rounder and move it to Baltimore for Gathier. Left Tackle and Quarterback done and done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 McNabb going to the Skins is terrible for the Bills. Means they will more than likely go LT for sure. Hope the Lions take DT or the Bills could miss out on the top LT's. Don't be surprised if it's Spiller at 9. Ridiculous. Maybe if Donahoe were here. Ask the Texans if they regret not taking Reggie Bush? Running backs have a short life span and there's plenty of good ones. There are only a handful of great LT's, NT's and QB's and we need one of each. This is a deep draft for wide bodies and we need to focus on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrFishfinder Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Well, now that Bulger is gonzo, the Rams will be glomming Sammy. Or, a slim possibility they would trade down and take Clausen, but I doubt that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 Seahawks will get him as they have two #1's this year to trade. Man I wish we had a couple firsts and a couple seconds this year. Darth, I am of the thinking that we should swap 1st round picks with the Rams and give them our 1st and 3rd next year, to pick Bradford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChasBB Posted April 5, 2010 Share Posted April 5, 2010 No way. QB is not our biggest need. No, we may not have a Jim Kelly type of talent on the roster, but we have serviceable quarterbacks on our roster who may even excel under Chan's tutelage. Gotta go for a big guy with our 1st round pick -- gotta beef up our lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalonian-at-Heart Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 No way. QB is not our biggest need. No, we may not have a Jim Kelly type of talent on the roster, but we have serviceable quarterbacks on our roster who may even excel under Chan's tutelage. Gotta go for a big guy with our 1st round pick -- gotta beef up our lines. Please don't take this as me being smart, but just humor me for a minute. I'll give you the Saints team with Edwards, and I'll take the Bills team and take Brees. I will win 8 out of 10 times. Do you agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 Please don't take this as me being smart, but just humor me for a minute. I'll give you the Saints team with Edwards, and I'll take the Bills team and take Brees. I will win 8 out of 10 times. Do you agree? No. Saints are just a better team all the way around. Brees didn't hit many bombs. his short passes chewed up the Colts. Understand, our lines suck. We can't run, we can't stop the run. We can't pass block or get off the field on third down. Brees wouldn't fix that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsCelticsAngelsBama Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 The Seahawks just traded a 2nd round pick for Whitehurst, I don't think they will be looking for a QB in round 1. No, they switched places with their second round picks AND they have two number ones. They could still be looking QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts