PastaJoe

And played terrible in the last two games, prompting a change.

Yes buddy, but we know Tyrod's ceiling, we need to find out about Peterman.

So Tyrod can score in cleanup time. Whoopee!

I agree, but you must get the QB. Look at which teams win the Super Bowl. They have the top tier QBs.

But they could have both if they weren't so bad at drafting; for years they either drafted positions that weren't a need (RB), made bad picks, or traded or let go to free agency those high picks. Good teams get their franchise QB and build around them.

If you don't have a quality QB, nothing else matters. How about getting a QB AND improving the line? Other teams seem to be able to do it.

What was someone saying about how Tyrod has pocket awareness?

And Peterman will learn. How many years has Tyrod been in the league and he still can't get the ball in the receiver's catch radius in the endzone. Tyrod isn't the answer, let's use the rest of the season to see if Peterman is. If not, then draft a QB.

It was the right decision. Tyrod was doing nothing in the past couple of games. I blame the OL for not giving Peterman time in the pocket.

Because he still isn't the answer.

The coach clap is back!

Christ, Tyrod still overthrows in endzone.

I never thought Tyrod was the answer. I still preferred switching to Peterman.

Tyrod's escapability has been masking the weakness of the OL. Give Peterman some time to step into his throw and he'd do much better.

Millionaires on a 747, it can't be that bad.

Peterman may have got overconfident by practicing against the Bills D.

Maybe stop them on 3rd down before they get into FG range.

I want Peterman to stay in. We know that Tyrod can't bring this team back from a big deficit. Let's see if Peterman can do it. And the D needs to stop LA.

Let him get all the poison out now. He can only get better.

Bills not used to having the ball hit them in the hands.

Bills can't have nice things.

What's this about allegations against Bill Clinton? I've never heard it discussed before. How has so many years passed and it's never come up. Why didn't Trump highlight it?

The tax cut that Kansas Governor Sam Brownback hailed in 2012 as “a shot of adrenaline into the heart of the Kansas economy” has been partially reversed. After years of sluggish growth and lower than expected revenues that forced brutal reductions in government programs, a Republican-controlled legislature overcame a Brownback veto to restore some of the taxes, paving the way for a moderate boost in spending. While the tax cut turned into a debacle, there is a potential silver lining: three clear messages for policymakers on federal tax reform. First, tax cuts won’t boost growth. Second, special tax rates for businesses will surely generate tax sheltering and revenue losses, but will not produce much new business activity. And, third, most importantly, when Americans see what their tax dollars buy, they choose higher revenues and more government spending over lower taxes and draconian program cuts. These lessons matter all the more because the tax and spending proposals made by President Trump and the House GOP bear important similarities to Brownback’s policies in Kansas. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2017/06/13/what-the-kansas-tax-cut-about-face-means/amp/

The Carolina Castoff Mafia must have pressured McD. Tolbert wants to catch passes downfield instead of dump offs.