bananathumb

Too bad, Schopp, spending a WHOLE day trying to incite us against the NFL because of spygate won't work. We know you love the NHL and hate football. You've lost all credibility when it comnes to anything footballish. WGR needs to do somethng about their football coverage, because their so-called football reporter is also a hockey guy, Paul Hamilton I believe he's called, a poor substitute for Chris Brown. He also has never watched Seinfeld, by his own admission. Enough said there. Get some football guys on air, WGR.

It was a shock to flip on that station around 3:30 today and hear real football talkfor a change. Then I realized it wasn't Schopp and the Bulldog, but rather Dennis Williams and the REAL BULLDOG, not the guy who has to play a sap beside Mikey. Please say that they got rid of the sulking boy who Donahoe snubbed so that he forever hates the NFL and replaced him with Dennis Williams.

We've had good STs for several years, but haven't made the playoffs. I want some new players who can actually start on offense and from my admittedly minor knowledge of who as avaialable today, I'd suggest that we passed over some good centers, guards and tight ends, let alone fullbacks. Am I wrong? Do I have to name them? Most have already been selected by other teams. Are the other teams run by idiots or GMs who make the playoffs?

These are strange players we're adding. No true tight end or fullback. How is our offense going to be better? One tall receiver?

Cottam TE Schuenning G Woodyard OLB Adibi OLB a center, maybe Zuttak but there are couple of others

W. Woodyard is a player. He could still play outside linebacker (doesn't have to move to safety) and would be an improvement over what we have. Schmitt and Fluellen would be interesting. We need a fullback somewhere.

Harvey Bennett Nelson

Go for it, Brad. I think we need to read that post. I can imagine whose names would pop up the most, but would really love to hear the real story.

what are your thoughts on the Toronto "home game"? Forgetting about whom they might play, do you think they will have a weird advantage because they are playing in their second "home" or at a disadvantage because their normal RWS fans won't be cheering them on? I tend to think they'll win that game even in they play the Patriots and kind of hope that's who is on the schedule for The Rogers Centre.

The usual top 10 are the 2 Longs, Matt Ryan, McFadden, Dorsey, Ellis, Gholston, McKelvin, Rivers and Clady. Which one of these slips and why? Which one would you NOT take at 11 even if he does slip? (My guess would be Clady and I wouldn't take him ahead of Harvey, Albert, Thomas or Jenkins/DRC). (I WOULD, however, take any of the others, even if it was just to take him ie McFadden or Ryan)

Your summary of Ngata's achievemens so far sort of shows that we "know-nothing" draftniks who were pounding the drum for the Bills to select him maybe knew what we were doing. Sometimes, it's obvious. Not this year though.

No WR is worth #11, so who would you pick if these are avaialable at tha spot? OLB Keith Rivers DE Derrick Harvey CB Leiodis McClendon or whichever other one you prefer I'd be content with the best of these or even a top OL or D, but don't think I could turn down Rivers. He might play special teams at first, until we see if Mitchell is really any good. If - as I suspect - he is just average, then Rivers would be quickly on the field.

We should just boycott WGR once they do stop talking hockey. They treat football fans as second-class listeners, so that's how we should treat them. Let the hockey fans listen all summer; see how their ratings fall. What a joke this station has become with its current programmer. Think back to the days of Chris Brown, Bob Gaughn and the Coach, among others who actually knew their football. The guy - Andy Roth - turned the station into a hockey-only loser.

Guys who have impressed me with their actual play last year. I'd like to see some of them in a Bills uniform. 1.Derrick Harvey DE Florida 2.Wesley Woodyard OLB Kentucky The guy is always around the ball making plays. 3.Steve Justice C Wake Forest (or Blackledge, the Mississippi State center) 4.Robert Jordan WR Cal (I'm not impressed with the so-called top receivers) 5.Hillis Fb Arkansas (don't believe Dominic Goodman of Cincinatti is coming out, but he looks like the best WR in college football to me. Maybe next year.)

I think you have stated the most sensible and most probable approach that teams take in drafting early rounders. In the Bills' case, I hope that DOES NOT mean, however, that they pass on a Rivers or Harvey just to grab a tall receiver. I will be very unimpressed if they do. What do you think?

Patrick Willis (or APetersen if he dropped) would make me happy, but if the brain trust at OBD had a plan something like this, I wouldn't mind having that top CB to replace Nate, seeing as we know nothing about Youboty. If it worked out this way, I'd be encouraged: Rd 1: Leon Hall CB Rd 2: David Harris ILB Rd 3a: Tony Hunt RB Rd 3b: Scott Chandler TE In other words, if we miss out on Willis or Petersen, there ARE other ways to get four good players who will immediately help. Just hope they don't settle on Lynch in Rd 1.

I would be more than happy with your draft choices. Tony Hunt has probably moved down to third round because of his 40 time, but he has proven to be a solid performer. Never really thought about going TE so early, but one is needed nd if we can get our RB and CB in round 3, Miller would be a fine choice in second. The main thing anyway is to get P. Willis and go from there.

Aw, gee, I respect Jaws "AND" awful lot too, {and I respect the English language even more}. Poor Todd, he's gonna cry about London (little Man) Fletcher, Takeo (no Achilles Spikes) and the GRRReat Nate Clements). Don't worry, Todd, just because Robbie and Donahoe are gone, there is still hope.

Used to think Woodson knew his stuff, but I didn't like his approach to the Bills Draft. I've seen Lynch play and wouldn't want him, especially if any of these guys were left at 12: Peterson, Willis, Hall or Okoye. [at least ONE of them will be.] Many good RBs in round 2. Seems all Woodson did for research was pick three players at the Bills' positions of need and throw in some names. Then he says we MUST choose these three! Besides, he didn't address the second third round pick we have. Thought NFL Network would have done a better job.