Says the guy that hasn't !@#$ing read any of them.
I don't "think" I remember what those books say; I read them. I could quote them, except 1) I can't post equations in this format, and 2) you wouldn't understand them anyway, so what's the point?
In other words, "It's not true, because I didn't read it on the web." If you could do the math, you could disprove your own bull sh--. You can't...you can't even define "regression" or "mean" (in fact, you've consistently defined "mean" incorrectly throughout this discussion). I'm not even sure you can define "toward".
Except that you demonstrably misunderstood that too, being unable to distinguish between the colloquial idea of "luck", the scientific idea of "error", and the mathematical ideas of "variance", "regression", and "mean". Yet another reason no one can discuss it with you: you don't even understand the basics. Like I said, pick up a statistics textbook.