Jump to content

The Big Cat

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,855

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by The Big Cat

    Sessions did not disclose two Russian envoy meetings

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    :lol: I sense projection. How hard are you patting yourself on the back for telling off those meanie PPPers?

     

    Sexual arousal from a message board? And you're still single? Can't be.

     

     

     

     

    Any perceptive person would consider this an incredible waste of time.

     

    why do you consider it important at all ?

     

     

    Bonus question:

     

    Name a few of these posters who are under this disillusionment that "they are objective" so badly that you need to correct them ?

     

    I'm not.

     

    I'm a conservative, most everyone here............save yourself..........has the balls to say what they believe.

     

     

    .

     

    That's a great question. I do consider it an exceptional waste of time. But I was on the road all week and working from home today and just couldn't help but stick my nose in the wind twisting. Learning to hold my tongue is an opportunity for development.

     

    I would say that 90% of posters here are oblivious to their own bias. Naming names would be an even bigger waste of time.

     

    Is that really how you wanted to spend your questions?

    Sessions did not disclose two Russian envoy meetings

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    You're right. You don't owe me anything. You owe it to yourself not to be an intellectual coward, and to defend the words you use.

     

    I'll also note that you weren't able to dispute a single thing I presented in my fourth bullet point:

     

    - Seth Rich was murdered in the timeline of the Wikileaks release.

    - His murder was presumed to be a robbery gone wrong, though nothing was missing from his body.

    - Wikileaks has made claims through two different individuals that the DNC information did not come from the Russians, but rather came from Rich.

     

    Stop being a hack and a coward.

     

    Hahaha, okay.

     

    So, a hack or a coward would connect all those dots and then turn around and say there's absolutely nothing to see re: the growing list of connections between Trump's circle and Putin's.

     

    I'm perfectly okay saying that either set of dots can be connected. I'm also perfectly content saying neither of them are even remotely plausible.

     

    But being sold on one and in denial of the other, when it's so perfectly aligned to party politics: that's cowardly !@#$ery, and it's all that ever happens here. On both sides.

    Sessions did not disclose two Russian envoy meetings

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    1) I'm asking you because you responded to my post.

     

    2) I presented fact. Seth Rich was murdered in what was described as a robbery, though nothing was removed from his body. Wikileaks has said that Rich was the individual who provided them with the emails.

     

    Okay.

     

    See, when you have your guys who unquestionably give you nothing but "facts," then identify other guys who never EVER, under any circumstance, provide anything you'll accept as "fact" then you're engaging in !@#$ery. That's why I responded to you. But--predictably--you have no inclination to think critically this way. That's why PPP is a circle jerk of !@#$ery day in and day out. It's partly comical, mostly pathetic.

     

    And yes, I come here for the sole purpose of critiquing the objectivity some of you have convinced yourselves of. It's anything but.

     

    Don't confuse this for any kind of validation of liberal !@#$ery. And don't confuse this with an endorsement of the liberal !@#$tards you guys like to spend all your time slapping around. You don't know diddly about my knowledge/opinions of these things. Spare me the self-congratulating insults that will profess to.

    Sessions did not disclose two Russian envoy meetings

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    I'll ask you four questions:

     

    - What evidence has been provided that the Russians supplied Wikileaks with the DNC emails?

     

    - What reason(s) do you have for not believing Wikileaks account of their obtaining the information in question?

     

    - What has the Intelligence Community, whose primary job it is to disseminate disinformation (lie), and overthrow democratically elected governments, done to earn your trust?

     

    - Why was the murder of a DNC staffer quickly swept under the rug as a robbery when nothing was missing from the corpse?

     

    1.) why are you asking me the first three questions as if i'm one of your barking seal whipping boys?

     

    but more importantly:

     

    2.) why is it so predictable that the local devotees can't/won't see the hypocrisy of consistently failing to apply the level of intellectually honest cynicism present in your first three bullets to the partisan hack buffoonery present in the fourth?

    Sessions did not disclose two Russian envoy meetings

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    There has never been any proof offered that the DNC's email was hacked, much less that it was hacked by the Russians.

     

    Wikileaks has stated, through to different sources, that they did not receive the emails from the Russians.

     

    The DNC wasn't hacked, it was leaked by a high level DNC staffer who was fed up with the corruption, and was then assassinated.

     

    Holy ****. I didn't think the PPP !@#$ery could be illustrated so succinctly. I'm moderately impressed.

    Sessions did not disclose two Russian envoy meetings

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

     

    It is standard operating procedure for sitting members of the Armed Services Committee to speak with ambassadors of other nations. Sessions spoke with ambassadors of 25 different nations last year, and the contacts he had with the Russians were not as surrogates for the Trump administration. There was no Trump administration at that point. The first contact was in January 2016, and the second in September 2016.

     

    Is your assertion that Sessions should have been clairvoyant and stopped doing the job he was elected to do in anticipation that a) Donald Trump would be elected President, and b) that President Trump would then name him AG?

    Well that's a point nobody is making.

    49ers hiring John Lynch as GM

    in The Stadium Wall Archives

    Posted

    Remember, another Stanford grad went from the playing field to various other ventures before returning to a football front office. Perhaps you've heard of John Elway, a guy who spent his post-NFL career running car dealerships and steakhouses in Denver before he came back to save the Broncos ... I don't think this is at all nuts provided that they give Lynch the technocrats he needs to manage salary cap issues, etc.

    And by save the Broncos you mean signed Manning as a FA?

    Dear Jerry

    in The Stadium Wall Archives

    Posted

    I hate the way you formatted your post. Very tough to respond to.

     

    A healthy Sammy and serviceable Woods is all the pass game really needed so long as Clay was involved and Shady was catching passes, given our high volume of run plays. This really can't be disputed, thus making Hogan a luxury to have. Otherwise, it's hindsight, after all the injuries, so bravo. There was clamoring galore that the Bills in the 2016 offseason needed to target a "true no. 2" This insistence was repeatedly met with two things: a request to define what a "true no. 2" receiver is and what its relevance would be to an offense that runs the ball more than any other team in the league and already has a "true no. 1" a pass catching te and a pass catching rb. Your point here is a zero, just more antagonism for antagonism's sake, because that's all you're good for.

     

    Sammy wasn't healthy, dunce. Clay barely got involved the year before, but of course we banked on that.

     

    They let a WR go for $700k and no compensation This is entirely false and misleading. He was a restricted free agent, they would have had to match the 3 year $12M the pats* offered. https://goo.gl/Re5EVJ Your point here is a zero, just more antagonism for antagonism's sake, because that's all you're good for.

     

    If the Pats had tried to sign him away with a higher tender (which would've cost $700k more for the Bills), we would've gotten a second round pick if we didn't match their contract. Dunce.

     

    Said WR puts up numbers that would've led the team, both in yards and TD's...with Tom Brady throwing him the ball in an offense that didn't skew nearly heavily toward the run game as the Bills' Your point here is a zero, just more antagonism for antagonism's sake, because that's all you're good for.

    He still outperformed every single WR on our team. Dunce.

     

    Said WR puts up a record-shattering playoff game performance in the second biggest stage in the NFL and almost singlehandedly wins them the game (as singlehandedly as any WR can win one, obviously the QB needs to throw it) Still no explanation as to how a single game performance in a divisional playoff game with Tom Brady at quarterback is in any way relevant to how his production in Buffalo would have panned out during the regular season. Your point here is a zero, just more antagonism for antagonism's sake, because that's all you're good for.

     

    What explanation is necessary? He had a big game for a division rival. It doesn't have to speak to anything he'd do in Buffalo to sting. Dunce.

     

    And he does this all with a division rival that has buried us for almost 20 years. Your point here is a zero, just more antagonism for antagonism's sake, because that's all you're good for.

     

    See above. Dunce.

     

    If you think anyone is going to "shut up" about that, you're delusional. No, I think everyone should STFU about it because they need to resort to convoluted nonsense to make the point (see above). Pretty clear where the delusion is in an argument that grafts stats accumulated in a home playoff game with Tom Brady throwing the ball onto the 2016 Bills offense.

     

    Whether or not Hogan would've had as good of a year on the Bills has no bearing on the fact that it sucks that he's playing well for a division rival, a team that most Bills fans hate with a burning passion, which makes it a story and something to talk about, whether you like it or not. Dunce.

     

    Nice life.

×
×
  • Create New...