The Big Cat

If you can win with an ultra conservative game plan, on the road, in the division, in the first half of the season, that's the right game plan.

If my boss called me into his office and told me he plans to bump my salary to $999,999, I wouldn't B word because it wasn't a million. The Bills should have been 3-1 in the first quarter, but Manuel cost them the Houston game. Would you like to argue that "playcalling" cost us that game? I don't think any level-headed person would. They switched to Orton and went 3-1 in the second quarter. Was it Hackett's "playcalling" that surrendered 37 points AT HOME in that one loss? No. It wasn't. So, until someone can point to a Bills loss this year and say "we lost because of offensive playcalling" these calls for "immediate termination" are !@#$ing ridiculous. Wow. Bold.

I'm ignoring what happened? So as far as how you've acknowledged the offense's 43 points on the road? How would you characterize that?

Did next to nothing? Did we win? What OUTCOME were you hoping for? Gifted? I see. So NOBODY deserves credit. Okay.

So if I'm getting this right: because we scored off four turnovers and not six, getting us 20 points rather than 26 or 34, and because without turnovers we only managed 23 points...on the road...against a division opponent...to win...where we've never won before...by 20 points, Hackett sucks? May be, just may be, in a game where the offense hangs 43 points going into the bye THERE WAS NO !@#$ING NEED TO CREATE TAPE ON ANY THING ELSE. Not only and am I befuddled by the absence of ends in all this bitching about the means, I'm shocked that nobody can explain what the point in running [whatever !@#$ing plays you seem to think they should have] when WE DIDNT !@#$ING NEED TO. There are eight games left on the schedule, one against each of our division opponents and and four against other teams from our conference. If we can win by running it up the middle and having out defense shut them down, why make it easier for teams to scout every wrinkle we potentially offer?

Is that your KC prediction you'd like on record?

Half past never. Misery loves company and this place is packed. And I guess the concept that eludes both of you is the difference between the Jets offense today and the Andrew Luck led Colts that have hung 34 on the road to that point. But please, carry on as if that call was analogous that happened to ANYTHING in the Bills game today.

I don't see a definition that mentions anything about reporting only the facts. But I can think of a bunch of terms you should check out.

Yeah. Okay.

43 points On the road Against a division rival Against a Rex Ryan D W/Both RB's injured ...are we going to ignore ALL these realities?

Put up 43 points on the road in a division game en route to 5-3. Yeah let's start the firing now.

It's a qualitative sport. Beware those who try and quantify it.

I rode from Ithaca to Rochester with a girl from Buffalo who, along with her sister and mother, had recurring supernatural experiences throughout her life. No joke, the entire ride she told one story after another. I can't even remember them all now, but the gist was she grew up in a house next to a creek and they later found out that during either the Revolutionary War or War of 1812 (I don't remember which), as soldiers marched through there, they'd leave the sick and injured ones next to the creek to die. Well, that explained the soldiers, both full-bodied and torso-only that she would routinely see walking around her back yard. But there were other INSANE things that happened both in her house and in the house of the strange elderly folks who lived next door who had a weird rule about NEVER shutting the dryer door all the way, and she just went on and on and on. Anyways. Two stories I can recall: For a brief period her mother kept coming downstairs every morning to find a glass of milk on the counter next to the gallon jug. Nobody in the family would fess up, but she kept harping on them until one day she kinda blew a gasket and got really pissed because she was convinced this girl or her sister or brother or dad was playing a stupid and prank, and Jesus Christ, that was like the third gallon of milk to spoil that month. Well, the next morning after her blow up she came down to find ANOTHER glass of milk, this one filled right to the brim...sitting on the counter...upside down. Also, one night the family was sitting around watching TV and her mother just randomly got up, walked across the room and picked up the phone. She put it to her ear, said nothing, put it back on the cradle and announced "we're moving." Supposedly, on the other line there was voice that simply gave an address, nothing more, nothing less. Her mom and dad had never heard of the street, had never been to that part of Buffalo, but her mom kept begging her dad to look it up and take her there. They found it, drove there and found a house for sale. They bought it and moved in and all the paranormal activity stopped. Until one morning this girl found her sister ashen and looking like she hadn't slept. After some coaxing her sister confessed that she had seen all the old spirits and entities from their old home and was tricked into inviting them to their new home. From that moment on, all the activity picked up again.

SO DID WARSHING MACHINES

got me

We're playing the Jets.

With regards to Decker, there was bountiful speculation that his value to the Jets would have been significantly diminished without Manning throwing him the ball. There were legitimate, ongoing debates about just how good of a receiver he was.

Also, hello. A (whiny) request to stop doing something bothersome is a giant billboard demanding a doubling down on said bothersome activity.

Everyone's wrong but you.

So you're saying your definition of 'exact' isn't all that exact?

It is definitely looking a little more dicey. I just think our D-line has Tanny's number. Plus, they're only taking three days rest, too.

My prediction looking good: http://forums.twobil...20#entry3216013 If this keeps up, we'll be finish 9-7!

This word 'exact.' I'm not sure it means what you think it does.

Well, if Rodak said it.

And what was the alternative, given Glenn's mystery injury? And how does your assumption that Ubrik is better suited than Peers for what they want to do not go along with the typical "i've never seen this thing but clearly the coach is wrong about this thing because internet message board"? When did other members of the staff express an opinion counter to the personnel groupings on the field? I'm genuinely curious. We would have been better off cutting all three? also What evidence do you have that players on the roster we've never seen practice would have been better options? Which times? Which players? Then surely you have the links to these numerous, ongoing interviews.