If you think The Washington Post is too liberal then read the Washington Times. If you think the New York Times is too liberal then read the NY Post. If you think MSNBC is too liberal then watch Fox News. You guys act like their is no conservative mainstream media that you can turn to.
By the way the Oliver North tidbit is inaccurate. The incident you refered to happened in March 1993 and didn't result in a front page article like you suggested. Instead there was a 1953 word feature on the possibility of Oliver North running for the US Senate in Virginia against Chuck Robb who at the time was a supporter of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Only 2 sentences at the very end of the article mentioned the gay joke North made at the Fairfax County GOP roast.
While the Dow plummets Obama's Intrade stock has skyrocketed today and the gamblers are giving him the edge in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada.
Obama wasn't the one who said he would "suspend" his campaign. McCain "suspended" his campaign to return to DC to help with the financial crisis Wednesday afternoon but he still made time to record an interview with Katie Couric...in NYC, then gave a speech the next morning at the CGI...in NYC, and then finally returned to DC on Thursday. All the while campaign surrogates still appeared on cable talk shows and TV ads ran in the battleground states. McCain and Obama are not on the Senate Banking Committee and they shouldn't be interjecting presidential politics into the crisis. They should both keep campaigning and return only when the package is up for a vote. As John Stewart said "John McCain is the only man who can impulsively overreact to something 10 days old"
The Drudge poll is just a website poll, the CBS/CNN poll's are "real" polls. If you clear your cookies you can vote on Drudge as many times as you want.
There's a good article in the Buffalo News today about the decline of the Rams. The team just doesn't have many good players anymore.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/story/449203.html
The first debate polls are out.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/27/...in4482119.shtml
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/27/deb...ref=mpstoryview
Isn't using the word "hacking" a little generous for this situation? Sounds like Palin was just too dimwitted to realize that as a public person it wouldn't be too hard for someone to find out the answer to security questions like "What's your mother's maiden name?" or "What city were you born in?".