daquixers_is_back
-
Posts
3,354 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by daquixers_is_back
-
-
-
McGahee fumbles ... arghhh
-
-
I've got it on Sopcast, seems about a minute delayed from radio, but I'll use it as if viewing highlights.
I have a Slingbox. The end user license of slingbox forbids using it to broadcast your signal to someone else, and they state that if caught they will blacklist your box's ID code making it very difficult to use even just for yourself. I had thought about mailing my box to a friend in Florida and having them set it up on their system, but decided not to.
For the record, I have season tix, they are being used today, I can't be there due to recovering from minor surgery. Go Bills!
macnmotion
Pardon the ignorance, but a 'Slingbox' allows you to see blacked out games?
P.S. SopCast just started working for me also.
-
Get over it. I still can't believe all the complaining on this board about this rule. Ticket sales is the priority and it has to be that way. When was the last time you saw a good live local concert from your couch when it played at a public venue attended by people that bought tickets?
Quitcherbitchin.
He isnt arguing the rule ... he is saying that even when we are NOT sold out we still have a higher attendance than many other stadiums in the league that ARE sold out. I am in agreement with him, and I believe there should be a league wide rule of about 68,000 for it to be a sell-out.
Its saying "The sop adress is not valid" for me
-
I would guess that stores see people who DO know what the abbreviations mean using it, and say "Hey, that'll save ad space!"
The complaint about "X-mas" meaning you're "crossing out Christ" is old (I first heard it when I was six, which I'm pretty sure is before you were born). It predates the modern PC bull sh-- attitude of "Must not offend non-Christians with Christian holidays". It is NOT some grand conspiracy against your Savior, God-boy.
I never said it was ...
-
-
Just got back ... there from 11:15pm - 8am ... they better like it.
Im tired.
-
Well Im leaving my house in about 15 minutes to stand in line for 9 hours to get my nephews the Wii system. There are already people in line. Wish me luck.
-
No. Not only is "X" an appropriate symbol for crucifixion (the typical Roman crucifixion cross was actually X-shaped; Jesus' crucifixion was very atypical), but it's also the Greek letter χ, as in "χριστοσ", which is "Christ" in Greek.
So if you have a problem with it, the problem's yours. The abbreviation is entirely appropriate.
I guess the question is ... are stores/people using X-mas as an abbreviation for Christ, or as an abbreviation to take Christ out, not knowing that X could very well represent him? I would guess the latter.
-
I have used another website similar (uses Sopcast) and I watched a few minutes of the Ravens game I believe it was a few weeks back ... it is OK but it is a bit slow.
-
-
-
-
-
Nates had good and bad games against great WR's over the last couple years. He played well against Johnson and Smith in 2005. Played horrible against Chambers in the 2nd Miami game in 2005, and in this year’s game against the Lions he was owned by Roy Williams. Regardless if you perceived his play to have gone down or not, it's fairly easy to see his current play going up. That being the case it really doesn't change the fact that something has improved his play. Is that something a 6th year veteran getting it, coaching, contract, or all of the above? This post is about it being more about contract, and if that's the case the original question becomes very important in our decision to bring him back or not.
Uhm ... Nate wasnt covering Roy Williams all day. That was McGee who got owned by Williams.
-
OK well thanks ... and apparently I am an idiot for not knowing it, because the rest of the board (and the world for that matter) knew how this function worked the day that they were born.
-
That was pretty funny. I like when he said (paraphrasing) "Let me give you guys some stats ... 48" vertical ... etc"HAHA! I just got to the whiffle ball tournament ... "could you imagine being that good?" he said ...
-
He had the best rushing year of his career that year (nearly 500 yards rushing that year)
Flutie really had a rough stretch during THREE games that year. Take away those THREE games and the other 14 he had 2,500 yards, 15 TD's and 9 INT's. Not great, but NOT horrible either.
-
In 2005 Nate was entering his 5th year, a contract year in which most expected the Bills to franchise him. His play really seemed to drop off in 2005. Given his age you would expect a progression which made his regression all the more noticeable. It wasn't injury related, and while the coaching was poor his play declined when compared to 2004 which he had the same coaches and system. To me what separates good and great players in the NFL is effort and motivation. With other factors disqualified I really can't find anything else to explain Nates decline in play from 2005 and the start of 2006.
As we all know Nate is now playing lights out football since the bye week. We promised to not use the franchise tag, and he's well aware of his future payday. It's not shocking to see a potential contract influence a player’s play, but in our case Nate will command pay that could make him one of the highest paid CB's in football. To me a contract so large is only worth it if it's going to a motivated Clements, otherwise your getting top 10 material and not top 3.
Im not sure what people mean by the drop-off in play in 2005 and early 2006. He did have a few missed tackles but that is all you can really bag him for. He only really had ONE bad game last season, which was against Chambers. The other games he shutdown a lot of coners, including STEVE SMITH. The only thing I can think of is that he was not getting INT's. Other than that I thought he played good. Heck even Champ Bailey didnt have more than 3 INT's for FOUR straight years.
-
Im partial to Denzel Washington in Remember The Titans.
-
Two bad QB's? I dont consider myself a Flutie homer or anything, but he did have 5,800 yards, 39 TD's and 27 INT's up to that point in his Bills career. Not sure how that is bad. Lets face it ... he was getting up there in age, and he wasnt going to be the QB of the future, but he had about a 68% winning percentage with the Bills (AKA about 11 wins a season).
-
I thought RJ played well that game, but overall as a team I think we would have played better and wouldnt have been in that situation if Flutie was playing. No real facts to back it up ... just a feeling.
-
OMGGGGGGG
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Second straight week bashing Young ... hmm.