phypon

Dude, your example of the 1930's NAZI's exemplifies the left today. "Deplorables", the "intolerant" against what we now call the 'right" or "conservatives". Also, the NAZI party HAD a party here in America. There was also a large communist movement in this country in the late 40's and 50's with doctrine that was meant to come to fruition after 50 years. Hell, go watch "Oppenheimer". You yourself made a comment about changing the Constitution and adding amendments to it. If you are all in on the policies and propaganda that has been put in front of you, then so be it. That being the case, you are not a part of this country and what it was founded on. Go somewhere else. We are at an impasse. I have no sympathy for you. None.

The election was rigged. Proven in court with the easy manipulation of counting machines, votes from dead people, more votes than registered voters, videos of votes being tossed in a dumpster, votes being transported via freight trucking. That is your deep state. Like it or hate it, we're all being disenfranchised. That's why I say it's bigger than just a Trump issue. They are dividing us. I'd rather not see that happen. People like you and I ARE the PEOPLE and regardless of election results, it should be fair. That DOJ is being used as lawfare, and will most likely be used again after the next election. That's a big problem for either side. We need to see what "they" are doing and try to unify to put a stop to it altogether.

YOU are the loyalist. You just don't see it. The funny thing is that all you people do is make everything about Trump. It's so much bigger than that. I'll say the same as I said to your friend, you just don't see it.

When someone like him says "Luckily, we have a deep state DOJ" you know they are a commie.

You don't have to be a Christian to disagree with your sentiment. All you're doing with a statement like that is parroting what you've heard in MSM. It's complete BS and when you do that you are the one making a correlation/causation argument. You talk about human rights and freedom of choice. You said: "You should be able to abort up until it would be able to survive outside the mother on it's own". With leaving it up to the states, go live in a state that aligns with your freedom of choice. I've already asked this, why is that a problem for you? Leaving if up to the states gives you your choice as well as the people that don't agree with you their choice to follow what they believe in. How is that not a solution for you? Doing it this way means that you are not impressing your ideology onto anyone else and the same time no one is impressing their ideology on to you. Freedom of choice, as you say. Not sure why leaving it up to the states is a problem for you since you are actually advocating for freedom of choice. Doing so completely aligns with your primary argument so I don't understand why you would have a problem with this.

Just read your edit. We def agree on that point. That is the tough question, when does life "begin". Some people have one opinion, and others have another. We both can agree that once outside of the womb and birthed into the world, abortion is off limits. I don't think this is a Christian issue (not sure why you feel the need to make that a point). This is an issue of people having a different stance on the issue regardless of religion or other metrics. The base point is, if it's left up to the states, rather than impressed on the population as a whole at the federal level, people's voices in their own communities are heard. Why is that a problem for you?

You didn't answer whether or not you condemn or condone after birth abortions. Do you think it's okay to have after birth abortions? I will respond more to your point in this post after you answer that question.

That's the whole point, let the community and citizens of that community decide. There is nothing twisted about that. That is the definition of exercising democracy. Also, do you condemn or condone after birth abortions? Where do you stand on that issue?

He said the "states" should decide, not the "state". The "state" is an oligarch federal government. It's the best solution. Just because you agree with the "state" now, what happens when you don't? Leave it up to the constituents in local communities to decide what they agree with rather than one central power. This give YOU choice. If you don't agree with your local community you can relocate to a like minded community. By doing so, YOU have a choice. Also, do you condemn after birth abortions or do you support it?

Yeah, he's def a paid shill. Plenty of news stories out there about posters like him being exposed as being paid provocateurs. More than likely it's more than just him posting under that username. You can see that from the posts and inconsistencies in the posting and writing styles. The reason they have to stonewall in answering a question directly is that they have to research previous posts in order to try to be consistent with their posting. It's a classic tactic that's been exposed on other social media sites. That's why he never answers a question and only replies with the same memes that are part of their script. This revelation should be a wake up call to all posters on here, whether they agree with him or not.

Yup, keep trying to get a rise out of me and others on here. As usual, stonewalling and still can't answer a question. Can't condemn after birth abortions. That's messed up... At this time, I'm wondering if BillSlime gets paid by the post or by the reply. He can't outright answer if it's okay to be a "minor attracted person" without stonewalling and now can't answer if he supports after birth abortions. This poster is clearly a paid shill.

What you are doing is called "stonewalling". Your non-answer is your answer. Let it be known to everyone that BillSlime cannot outright condemn after birth abortion.

Why don't you just answer the question? It's not that hard.

Well, you quoted me and proved that you agree with afterbirth abortion. No surprise there, BillSlime. Anyone else want to declare their support?

Any person or poster on here that agrees with execution/abortion of a baby after birth is all you need to know about them. How many Leftist posters on here have the BALLS to say in this thread that they support abortion after birth? Come on, raise your hand if you support that. Simply quote me and and pledge your support for after birth abortions.

Laughable Leftists: - Biden has dementia..."No, Trump has dementia!" - Biden is a proven pedo that showers with his daughter..."No, Trump is a pedo!" - Trump wants to close the border..."No, Biden wants to close it but Trump's party is blocking it!" - Biden throughout his career has proven to be a racist..."No, Trump is a racist!" ...and on, and on, and on... See a theme? It's called projection. And, it's not working anymore. The left is using the playbook of "tell a lie long enough and it becomes truth". Yet, they call Trump Hitler. These leftist tactics aren't working anymore. I have no sympathy for the left today. The left is the enemy of the state.

Trump supports, conservatives, non-Trump supporters in the center, libertarians all wave the American flag while leftists burn them...

Hopefully this is a one off and it's not a sign of the lunatics on the left trying to kick things off. Horrible story out of NJ today: Headline: 'HORROR: 64-Year-Old New Jersey Man Who Operates Trump RV Beaten with Sledgehammer, Airlifted to Hospital with “Significant Head Injuries”' It's breaking, so don't know all the details, but not a good look... https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/horror-64-year-old-new-jersey-man-who/

I absolutely agree with the bolded. I was hoping that the poster I'm talking about would have kept his agreement and, if so, I think that would have gone a long way to the bolded of what you said. That was the agreement we came to in order for me to delete that thread. You're a good poster. I know you agree with a lot of what the poster in question has to say, but you have to see how disruptive his ad hominem and non-sequitur ramblings contribute to a devolution of healthy conversation here on the board. I would venture to say that if that poster was absent for a couple of weeks the conversation here on PPP would improve and be much healthier than it has been. Due to the poster in question, I have absolutely been guilty of needing a course correction myself. And, I am doing that as we speak by not engaging, replying to him, ignoring him, or quoting him. We all need to do a better job of that, I'm doing that myself, and I can tell you that starting with ignoring that poster, we will all be better for it. You and I clearly have different ideologies on many topics, but sometimes we also agree. We also have had enough respect in our correspondence to acknowledge each other's perspective and "agree to disagree" without insulting each other, making false accusations, or changing the core topic of the thread into a topic that is completely different. When a poster of that caliber comes into play, it brings out the worst in all of us and we may say things that are not a true reflection of who we are. It's like a cancer in the locker room. It's not good for anyone, even for those of us who disagree with certain topics. It's simply unhealthy.

I hear ya, and it's exactly how to handle a poster like that. Initially, I didn't want to get into the correspondence I had with him and share it thinking that if I did it would only provoke him, so out of a semblance of respect and pity, I didn't want to throw him under the bus. It wasn't private, it was in the deleted thread, so it was public correspondence. He literally begged me to delete the thread because he was afraid that SDS would see it and he would get banned. I didn't want to delete it, but I had a moment and felt bad for him. That was clearly a mistake. After begging me to delete the thread I put out the stipulation that if he cleaned up his act and agreed to tone things down with his responses to other posters I would delete the thread. He agreed, and as you can see, he lied and continued his trolling and disruptive behavior. I wish I screenshotted his posts before I deleted the thread. He simply needs to be completely ignored. There is no place for a poster/troll/paid shill like him here. All he does is drag down the level of what could be a healthy discussion between other posters. He knows exactly what he is doing and gets off on it. Everyone needs to ignore him and not participate in any threads that were started by him. I've noticed that he is always bumping his own threads to stay relevant. Stay out of any thread that he created, don't quote him, and don't reply to him.

Totally agree with the advice you gave about ignoring a certain poster. Once everyone stops quoting them and stops replying to them, they will have have lost their "troll power". I would take it a step further though, when that person does violate TOS, report them. It's up to us as a community to come together in order to remove any poster that is a disruptive troll that, instead of engaging in a healthy discussion, devolves into personal attacks as well as thread jacking every thread and trying to turn it into an anti-Trump campaign even when it has nothing to do with the topic being discussed by others.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/new-site-shows-americans-grocery-bill-prices-under-bidenflation-vs-trump/ https://www.infowars.com/posts/woman-receives-fbi-visit-over-x-post-criticizing-lax-sentencing-of-man-who-murdered-cousin/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/another-one-thug-long-rap-sheet-sucker-punches/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/what-is-happening-nyc-women-randomly-punched-face/

Really good part at around 2:50 mark

https://notthebee.com/article/baltimore-mayor-brandon-scott-says-white-people-should-be-scared-of-him-because-his-purpose-in-life-is-to-put-their-way-of-life-at-risk