Jump to content

Tux of Borg

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tux of Borg

  1. Sorry JB I have to disagree with you here. Not being able to clearly see the license plate of a car you have pulled over can be very dangerous to a police officer. As former patrol officer, when making a vehicle stop the first thing I did was run the plate of the car to get an idea of who and what I might be dealing with. If a vehicle is stolen or the driver has prior convictions can be vital information to help keep the officer safe on the stop. Not having this information just adds another unknown into what can always be a potentially deadly situation.

     

    Now, personally I think in a situation where I stopped someone for an infraction such as this I would use it as a reason to see if there is anything else I could get the driver for i.e. expired reg, no insurance, contraband,etc; which is really what these laws are supposed to be for. Would I write a driver for just solely having a plate cover? Probably not unless it was a repeat offender or they were particularly rude and uncooperative.

     

    The technology has really made a patrol officer's job safer. Now when you stop a vehicle your tag reader will zoom in on the tag and:

     

    1) Read off DMV information to you, including vehicle registration information, make, model and color of vehicle. (good for IDing tags that don't belong on a vehicle)

    2) Check for stolen status.

    3) Check the vehicle's tag in active BOLOs (also known as ABP)over the past 7 days.

    4) Tell you the history of the vehicle. Who has stopped that vehicle and what was the outcome.

    5) It runs the vehicle owner's information for Driver History, Wanted Status, Terrorist Watch List and history with law enforcement (including witness, victim and suspect info). If the vehicle owner has violent tendencies or is known to carry a weapon, it will let you know of that.

  2. Sometimes it's better to be lucky than fast...

    <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tBFXLNR2kI" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tBFXLNR2kI

    </a>

     

    Saw this a few weeks ago. Major officer safety issue with holding his flashlight in his gun hand.

  3. http://www.wmbfnews.com/Global/story.asp?S=12408129

     

    Deputy approached by five suspects before being shot

     

    PHOENIX (AP) - A sheriff's deputy was shot and wounded Friday after encountering a group of suspected illegal immigrants who apparently had been hauling bales of marijuana along a major smuggling corridor in the Arizona desert.

     

    The violent episode comes amid a heated national debate over immigration.

     

    State and federal law enforcement agencies deployed helicopters and scores of officers in pursuit of the suspects after the deputy was shot with an AK-47 on Friday afternoon.

     

    Authorities say 53-year-old Pinal County Sheriff's Deputy Louie Puroll had a chunk of skin torn from just above his left kidney, but the wound was not serious. He was reported to be in good condition Friday night at Casa Grande Regional Medical Center.

  4. Adam Caplan of Scout.com just reponded to my question on twitter.

     

    I asked him if the Bills would be better off taking Clausen in Rd. 1 or taking a LT early and then taking a QB in the mid rounds like Skelton.

     

    He responded.

     

    caplannfl I'd wait on QB, they also like Levi Brown. RT @JoshMac28: @caplannfl Would Buffalo be better off taking Clausen or grabbing Skelton?

     

    Looks like Adam nailed it.

  5. All the crazy talk from the radical right was bound to influence someone on the edge. No surprise that he's in a state who's governor has talked about secession. Birthers, teabaggers, and the rest of the loons who think the gov't is taking away their freedom. If this domestic terrorist was a Muslim, they would be screaming about how weak Obama is on terrorism, but since he's a "normal" guy angry at the gov't and IRS, he'll be held up as an example of how the gov't can push people over the edge with its socialist agenda.

     

    Ever since Hope and Change was elected, there certainly has been a rise in movies about the apocalypse.

  6. an untapped BILLION dollar industry that the government refuses to become a part of and actually fights, therefore SPENDING billions on another "War on a concept".

     

    legalize it. control it. tax it. make a butt load of money. why is this so hard?

     

    They will need billions to pay for the additional medical costs, insurance costs, and legal costs that would result from making it legal.

     

    Jacqueline Saburido Story

  7. http://i.gizmodo.com/5167465/get-200-itune...ouchers-for-260

     

    Get $200 iTunes Store Vouchers for $2.60

     

    By Jesus Diaz

     

    Stop being an ass and don't pirate songs and movies. Pirate money and get legal material! Chinese hackers have cracked the algorithm that generates the iTunes Store gift cards: You can get $200 for $2.60.

     

    According to the blog of Outdustry—a music industry consultancy firm in China—the market is getting inundated with this pirate cards, with prices falling quickly. You can find $200 iTunes Music cards in Taobao for as low as $10, and the blog is reporting prices of $2.60. In fact, the prices are dropping dramatically as the number of vendors selling these cracked cards increase.

     

    Nobody knows what this means for Apple yet. For sure, a change of the formula that generates the vouchers looks like a definitive possibility, but that won't solve the situation of legal cards already in the market.

     

    What a nightmare... they can either lose millions on fake cards or piss off their customers and revoke all cards.

  8. http://www.ifmagazine.com/new.asp?article=7427

     

    Exclusive Breaking News: 'JERICHO' THEATRICAL MOVIE IN DEVELOPMENT

     

    By CARL CORTEZ, Contributing Editor

    Published 1/14/2009

     

     

    LOCATION: Jericho

     

    THE SKINNY: It’s the concept that never seems to die, and that’s a good thing according to JERICHO executive producer/director.

     

    While promoting his new horror TV series HARPER’S ISLAND for CBS (airing midseason), Turteltaub tells iF that he’s really happy about JERICHO’s first season being re-aired Sunday nights on the CW.

     

    “It’s crazy,” says Turteltaub. “I think they’re airing it because it’s cheap and there’s still that feeling that it hasn’t really gotten all the attention it can. When I think about the fact, a repeat of JERICHO on CW actually has more viewers than an episode of MAD MEN, you realize the difference between cable and broadcast, you realize the difference between what the press is watching vs. what America is watching. And I bring up MAD MEN, because it’s a brilliant show. But it’s still fun to see the show won’t die.”

     

    So if the show proves to be a CW success, could it come back to broadcast TV with new episodes?

     

    “If it was like this remarkable success, they would bring it back,” Turteltaub says.

     

    Of course, the big news is Turteltaub’s company is currently hatching a potential feature film version of the TV show.

     

    “We’re developing a feature for JERICHO,” says Turteltaub. “It would not require you to have seen the TV show, but it get into life after an event like this on a national scale. It would be the bigger, full on American version of what’s going on beyond the town in Jericho.”

     

    And what about the TV cast – would they return?

     

    “Oh yeah!”

     

    And would it be a huge budget?

     

    “Anything would be a huge budget compared to what we were dealing with,” he adds. “If we had $40 million dollars to make a movie with, that’s 20 times more than we did before.”

     

    :blink:

  9. Word is, Obama is going to sign a bill to ban ammo like .223 and .308. People are buying up ammo like crazy. Good thing 9mm and .45 cal are harmless.

    Of course .223 and .308 can be used at long range. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.

     

    I've heard the rumor myself but have yet to read anything in print yet.

  10. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/f...rizona-rancher/

     

    16 illegals sue Arizona rancher

     

    An Arizona man who has waged a 10-year campaign to stop a flood of illegal immigrants from crossing his property is being sued by 16 Mexican nationals who accuse him of conspiring to violate their civil rights when he stopped them at gunpoint on his ranch on the U.S.-Mexico border.

     

    Roger Barnett, 64, began rounding up illegal immigrants in 1998 and turning them over to the U.S. Border Patrol, he said, after they destroyed his property, killed his calves and broke into his home.

     

    His Cross Rail Ranch near Douglas, Ariz., is known by federal and county law enforcement authorities as "the avenue of choice" for immigrants seeking to enter the United States illegally.

     

    Trial continues Monday in the federal lawsuit, which seeks $32 million in actual and punitive damages for civil rights violations, the infliction of emotional distress and other crimes. Also named are Mr. Barnett's wife, Barbara, his brother, Donald, and Larry Dever, sheriff in Cochise County, Ariz., where the Barnetts live. The civil trial is expected to continue until Friday.

     

    The lawsuit is based on a March 7, 2004, incident in a dry wash on the 22,000-acre ranch, when he approached a group of illegal immigrants while carrying a gun and accompanied by a large dog.

     

    Attorneys for the immigrants - five women and 11 men who were trying to cross illegally into the United States - have accused Mr. Barnett of holding the group captive at gunpoint, threatening to turn his dog loose on them and saying he would shoot anyone who tried to escape.

     

    The immigrants are represented at trial by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), which also charged that Sheriff Dever did nothing to prevent Mr. Barnett from holding their clients at "gunpoint, yelling obscenities at them and kicking one of the women."

     

    In the lawsuit, MALDEF said Mr. Barnett approached the group as the immigrants moved through his property, and that he was carrying a pistol and threatening them in English and Spanish. At one point, it said, Mr. Barnett's dog barked at several of the women and he yelled at them in Spanish, "My dog is hungry and he's hungry for buttocks."

     

    The lawsuit said he then called his wife and two Border Patrol agents arrived at the site. It also said Mr. Barnett acknowledged that he had turned over 12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998.

     

    In March, U.S. District Judge John Roll rejected a motion by Mr. Barnett to have the charges dropped, ruling there was sufficient evidence to allow the matter to be presented to a jury. Mr. Barnett's attorney, David Hardy, had argued that illegal immigrants did not have the same rights as U.S. citizens.

     

    Mr. Barnett told The Washington Times in a 2002 interview that he began rounding up illegal immigrants after they started to vandalize his property, northeast of Douglas along Arizona Highway 80. He said the immigrants tore up water pumps, killed calves, destroyed fences and gates, stole trucks and broke into his home.

     

    Some of his cattle died from ingesting the plastic bottles left behind by the immigrants, he said, adding that he installed a faucet on an 8,000-gallon water tank so the immigrants would stop damaging the tank to get water.

     

    Mr. Barnett said some of the ranch´s established immigrant trails were littered with trash 10 inches deep, including human waste, used toilet paper, soiled diapers, cigarette packs, clothes, backpacks, empty 1-gallon water bottles, chewing-gum wrappers and aluminum foil - which supposedly is used to pack the drugs the immigrant smugglers give their "clients" to keep them running.

     

    He said he carried a pistol during his searches for the immigrants and had a rifle in his truck "for protection" against immigrant and drug smugglers, who often are armed.

     

    ASSOCIATED PRESS DEFENDANT: Roger Barnett said he had turned over 12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998.

     

    A former Cochise County sheriff´s deputy who later was successful in the towing and propane business, Mr. Barnett spent $30,000 on electronic sensors, which he has hidden along established trails on his ranch. He searches the ranch for illegal immigrants in a pickup truck, dressed in a green shirt and camouflage hat, with his handgun and rifle, high-powered binoculars and a walkie-talkie.

     

    His sprawling ranch became an illegal-immigration highway when the Border Patrol diverted its attention to several border towns in an effort to take control of the established ports of entry. That effort moved the illegal immigrants to the remote areas of the border, including the Cross Rail Ranch.

     

    "This is my land. I´m the victim here," Mr. Barnett said. "When someone´s home and loved ones are in jeopardy and the government seemingly can´t do anything about it, I feel justified in taking matters into my own hands. And I always watch my back."

×
×
  • Create New...