Jump to content

Crap Throwing Monkey

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,499
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Crap Throwing Monkey

  1. Two TD's down though. NOW if Jauron wants to go for it on 4th and 1 in FG range, I'm for it.
  2. Almost exactly. He was about a half-second too early doing it.
  3. Legit. Nit-picky, the Patriots would have got away with it, but it was a legit call.
  4. He did need to block the guy...after the ball was caught. Not before.
  5. Conservative crap like last week, when they went for it on 4th and short in FG range...?
  6. Passing on a an early and short yardage down. Not 2nd and 7, you frickin' nitwit.
  7. Of course, ie helps that Jauron and Fairchild don't have Travis Henry throwing the friggin' ball.
  8. Just don't go for it on 4th and short in FG range. Please. Up by 17...fine, do it, nail the friggin' coffin shut on them. Up by 10...take the points.
  9. Bit of both. Losman had a couple bad passes, a couple "Oh sh--, I'm gonna get killed" throwaways, and a couple on target passes that should have been caught but weren't.
  10. Okay, good play by Crowell for the interception... But why the hell was Ryan Denny behind him?
  11. Welker was down, definitely. Saban might finally get a challenge right...
  12. There's my Mickey-Mouse fake end-around bull sh-- reverse !@#$tard play! Consistency, thy name is Mularkey.
  13. There's holding all over the place (haven't seen it on the Bills line...but I haven't been looking, I'm sure it's there). Officials just aren't calling it. It's almost like they changed the holding rules...
  14. What the hell is wrong with Saban? Challenging the sack/fumble on that play? Hey, moron...the play was blown dead, no one recovered the ball! What are you challenging? And yeah, Dierdorf, it was a dumb play by Losman, letting two guys blow through the line...
  15. Evans looks like friggin' Bucky Brooks out there. WTF?
  16. And I forgot to add...it was 2nd and 7, a typical passing down. Play action on 2nd and 3, you might have a point. On 2nd and 7...not so much.
  17. Could have been intercepted and run back for a TD...then you'd be complaining that they abandon the run, which had worked to that point. Again, hindsight vs. foresight. Results are not preordained when the play is called.
  18. Wel...it was a good hit. Leonhard was owned. Great punt, though. And how did Miami ever hang for so long with the Steelers? They look fugly today. And McMichael blocking Schoebel? Something's a little !@#$ed with THAT blocking scheme. Thanks, Mike...
  19. And that extra yard's a complete deal breaker. Yeah, I understand.
  20. Yeah, because they called that play knowing it would lose three yards. They got to that point with six straight running plays. So they shouldn't have called a seventh because of the result that play got? Hindsight and foresight are actually two different things...
  21. A 55 yarder with Olindo Mare kicking? Not an entirely unreasonable call; Mare's as good a kicker from that distance as any in the league. I've seen worse calls.
  22. Hey, it's simple Mike Mularkey football. Abandon what's working.
  23. FIVE sacks. Culpepper is Denny's B word...
  24. Safety blitz...Ko Simpson...first NFL sack. Congrats to the rookie. This pass defense is something else. Or Miami's line is just tragic. Not sure which...
×
×
  • Create New...