Homelander

Actually, that’s just revisionist nonsense. The Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was a real, verifiable agreement. Iran was complying with it confirmed repeatedly by the IAEA and US intelligence until Trump tore it up. That deal dramatically rolled back Iran’s enrichment, dismantled centrifuges, and gave inspectors unprecedented access. Was it perfect? No. But it was working. The second it was scrapped, Iran ramped enrichment back up and now they’re closer to a bomb than ever. So no, pretending they ‘never abided by any agreement’ doesn’t make your argument smarter it just makes it lazier. And let’s be real: if Israel believed diplomacy was impossible, they wouldn’t have begged the US to keep pressure on Trump to stay in the deal before he scrapped it. Facts are stubborn things. Top Israeli military officials say Trump’s Iran deal exit was a 'mistake,' bad for Israel Former Israeli PM: The Iran Deal Was Flawed. But Trump’s Decision Makes World ‘More Uncertain’ ‘The Iran Deal Was a Mistake. Withdrawing From It Was Even Worse’ An Israeli View on Trump’s JCPOA Withdrawal: “Hope Is Not a Strategy” The Iran Nuclear Deal Has Been a Blessing for Israel Top Israeli Security Experts Agree — Withdrawing from the JCPOA Nuclear Agreement Has Been a Total Failure Why Israeli Nuclear Experts Disagree with Netanyahu on the Iran Deal | The New Yorker

Irony

You’re praising this administration for being ‘true to their word’? That's nice. Trump campaigned as the “peace candidate” and promised to end wars on day one. Instead, he tore up the Iran nuclear deal during his first term - then never replaced it. And you seriously think Iran was going to negotiate a new deal with the same guy who shredded the last one just to look tough for his racist base? That agreement was the only functioning, verifiable deal keeping Iran’s nuclear ambitions in check - and they were complying with it. Tearing it up wasn’t strategy, it was ego-driven politics. Now the "no new wars" chuds are cheering on strikes that have escalated tensions and risked a wider regional war? Let’s be honest: this was never about peace or strength. It was about optics. What you’re calling ‘consistency’ is just chaos wrapped in a flag and sold as patriotism. And if you’re still buying it, congrats - you’re just another sucker who got played by a guy who never meant a word he said.

Operation Eagle Claw didn’t fail because we lacked guts it failed because it was a logistical nightmare with no margin for error. ‘Would’ve been something’ doesn’t change that 8 Americans died and zero hostages were rescued. Real leadership means learning from disaster, not romanticizing it.

Oh c'mon - @Doc's a good guy even if he is just a little impressionable. No matter how hard he tries, he’s never going full MAGA like the Three B’s: - @BillsFanNC @B-Man @Big Blitz.

Blue states did.

Oh, it matters a lot. The US had never struck inside Iran until now. So let’s drop the fantasy that Trump’s so-called ‘Middle East peace’ was anything more than a PR stunt wrapped in a campaign bullet point, just like peace through strength.

Here's 1

Before the so-called ‘pro-peace’ candidates came along, when exactly was the last time the US bombed inside Iran?

@Doc deleted that real quick

Definitely sounds like the pro-peace ticket - just keep bombing indefinitely and hope no one notices it’s basically the Bush Doctrine in a MAGA hat. Nothing says diplomacy like an endless loop of explosions and zero strategy for what comes next. You voted for that right

Nothing screams foreign policy genius like a flashy airstrike that delays Iran's nuke program by a few months, rattles the whole region, and rebrands ‘mission accomplished’ for MAGA cosplay. But sure, if the real goal was to look tough on cable news while Iran quietly rebuilds and your base loses healthcare, then yeah... mission very much accomplished.