Jump to content

Starr-Bills

Community Member
  • Posts

    166
  • Joined

Everything posted by Starr-Bills

  1. Sigh. okay. 1. He sent tweets saying pence failed/let him down. They brought the gallows (symbolic or not) and extrapolated on his tweets with the, uh assets on hand. 2. He seemed to approve. 3. That’s why they drew weapons on the floor of the house. Tourists. Map of “northeast pa in north west pa. (Note. Maybe VA wine is better than central NY wine, but  that’s a low bar.
  2. I didn’t say they lied. The point I was making that he was not hit in the ear, I stand corrected, didn’t look like it to me, but i didn’t do the investigation or the medical examination (which we still haven’t seen). I think my post specifically said he was shot at. and you’re drifting, but people were running through the capital yelling hang Mike pence. He had to hide in a sub parking area and refused to get in his car with the USSS. Why, tweets and speeches by old healed one ear felon. 🤷‍♂️
  3. Oh huh, look at that, news to me. Both the FBI saying his ear was ‘definitely hit by a bullet’ and you believing the FBI. Guess he is right, he is a very fast healer, maybe he’s Wolverine and that is why it was only a squib’s worth of blood, he was healing already as he was going to the ground. I stand corrected, thanks for enlightening me. Btw I never said there wasn’t an attempt.
  4. Nothing like insulting the woman reporter before she even finishes her question to win hearts and minds. Nice guy. It was about the fact that he is such a “fast healer”.
  5. Can’t really expect him to hear with that shot off ear…
  6. Well I’m not a constitutional scholar. But it seems in the unlikely event both the democrats win a majority in the house and potentially the senate and old one ear wins, then Raskins (who is a constitutional scholar and law professor I believe) video suggesting that congress Could act to block him from serving per the 14th. I don’t know the details of how this would work but it’s not unreasonable that it is a possibility. Especially considering SCOTUS ruled specifically that congress has the responsibility. I, and i think i speak for most, would not like to see it come down to that. I think we would also not want to see the election thrown to a house vote because of partisan delays in the states, regardless of our political leaning. What I’d like to see is one person (yes citizen) one vote, the American way. (Don’t even get me started on the EC)
  7. Second impeachment of Donald Trump Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction case) so let’s game this out. Jan 3 congress is seated. Dems win a majority. They then disqualify Old one ear felon for violating 14/3. “The justices disagreed in how the federal government would determine the issue of Section 3 disqualification. Five majority justices in the unsigned opinion decided that Congress would need to pass legislation to enforce the 14th Amendment’s disqualification provisions. “Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse,” the five justices wrote in the opinion’s second paragraph.” so seems it’s up to congress to enforce the constitution per SCOTUS.
  8. Fourteenth Amendment  Equal Protection and Other Rights Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Amdt14.S3.1 Overview of the Insurrection Clause (Disqualification Clause) Amdt14.S3.2 Trump v. Anderson and Enforcement of the Insurrection Clause (Disqualification Clause) not sure he could get 2/3 of congress to remove this disability.
  9. If by they you mean article 3 of the 14th amendment.
  10. It tries to make a joke, but it is just dumb. (Cruelty is not humor).
  11. It’s not cheating if we change the rules to cheat.
  12. So which is the lie? (Note this tweet has the audio, instead of a link to an article).
  13. Yelling fire in a theater when there is no fire is not protected speech, it’s actually also disinformation.
  14. Like you would listen to my opinion any way, also I posted a tweet from veterans vote posted again since things can get lost here.
  15. You mean like NC anti-communist calling everybody he doesn’t agree with a commie, etc. srly?
  16. Nope they are weird. (P.s ooef does nothing but attack people like a 5 year old, how many ‘nick names’ does he have for Kamabla. <yes he even misspells it on purpose>) also Vance 100 people show, 90 press Harris, Walz rally in the 10’s of thousands. P.s. this is as close as JV is ever going to get to AF2.
  17. <sarcasm> Just more of those brainwashed fools, spouting the company line, nothing to see here. </sarcasm>
×
×
  • Create New...