Joe Ferguson forever

So why would you use him to further your argument? By definition, you used appeal to authority fallacy.

Whether you think I’m weird is irrelevant and i couldn’t care less. If article 4 is declared the next step is discussion with other member nations. Trump would certainly have input.

Too much for the middle class https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/09/25/middle-class-americans-economy-consumer-confidence/86316163007/

Yes, this was very, ahem, revealing.

Banned in schools. If non vaxed personnel were only banned in a few hospitals, would they not still be banned?

They are banned in schools. Not enough for you?

It has everything to do with it. We have the world’s best military and trump is commander in chief. If he doesn’t cooperate with NATO the calculus changes dramatically.

https://www.pnj.com/story/news/education/2023/09/22/florida-leads-nation-in-book-bans-full-list-of-banned-books/70934406007/

Couldn’t trump refuse to participate with NATO on a strike against Russian provocations? He’s made it abundantly clear that he’s not a big fan

So, not a red herring. He can order it.

I thought Denmark did.

So you don’t think the commander in chief could order us pilots to not shoot? so far, no consequences for their impermissible provocation.

I think we need more detail before we can conclude he was wrecked.

Do you see trump ordering that? I sure don’t. He hasn’t even followed through on increasing sanctions.

I thought the examples in the article were great. I also wasn’t aware of some of the fallacies described. I find logic fascinating. It’s really applied mathematics imo. Why would you consider him an authority on scientific research and then appeal to his authority? See how this works?

"up to". weasel word. when I have time I'll look up this persons expertise in these matters. why would an economist be considered an expert on scientific studies? Search Assist Peter St. Onge is an American economist and commentator known for his libertarian views on taxation and government regulation. He frequently discusses economic trends in media and has been critical of federal income taxes and inflationary policies. Wikipedia Overview of Peter St. Onge Peter St. Onge is an American economist and commentator known for his libertarian views. He is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation and frequently discusses economic trends and public policy in various media outlets.

yes. And logic is the best way to get there.

more cartoons from maga. sad.

China wants Taiwan. Russia has already violated airspace. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/09/25/russian-pilots-dared-nato-start-war/ The rules of engagement only matter if you are willing to follow them.

very dangerous bluster. The tightening alliance of Russia and China makes this threat worrisome. They are both provoking potential conflict seemingly in support of their imperialistic goals. Perhaps they believe that together they could win. Or maybe they're just seeing how far they can go without the US responding.

you disagree with him therefore he has "tds". See how this works?

Of course not. Fallacies are the basis of many or your arguments. The only place "lying" could be present in an argument is when a conclusion is based on false premises. Fallacies are present in the formation of a conclusion from the premises. All are fair game for criticism. But "tricks" as Orlando called fallacies, are often purposely and stealthily used to deceive. I'm not on reddit.

you call me out on fallacies and I'll call you out from here on. Deal?

exactly. But RFK jr and trump just stumbled on the holy grail and enlightened the world with their wisdom.

I routinely cite respected sources to bolster my opinions. you do not. I have an MS in bioanalytical chemistry so I'm not science or lab naive.