Jump to content

Lost

Community Member
  • Posts

    965
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lost

  1. I woulda rather ran our RB room back with Cook/Ty Johnson and using that 4th rd pick on another WR.   As it is it seems like we're putting an awful lot of stock into Coleman devolping into a #1 receiver this season and Shakir into a number 2.  Id like a little more insurance than that.

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. 30 minutes ago, Process said:

    I think Beane was very careful not to trade picks from next year. It seems like they are planning on next off season being when they go for it and make some bigger moves. 

     

    It's disappointing, but I still think it's a team that can compete for a Superbowl this year. 

     

    Just feels like a ton of missed opportunities this draft with how many receivers we looked right past.   What if Coleman flops and next years WR class is kinda awful like 2023s?

  3. 1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

    Meh. He might be a good player and he'll probably start from day one, and that's fine, but it's just a safety. Feels much more like a need pick than a value pick. Troy Franklin and a bunch of 2nd round caliber OL were still on the board. I don't hate the pick I'm just underwhelmed.

     

    I hope we trade up in the 3rd round. Too many day three picks. Get a legit offensive player in the top 80.

     

    Someone needs to lace Beanes coffee with cocaine next year.  This has been the most melancholy draft I can remember.  Accumulating day 3 picks to fill out the roster with special teamers.  He had plenty of ammo to move around in round 2 but hasn't.  

  4. 2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

    Don't like it. Doesn't separate. When they put up Mike Williams as a pro comp that says it all. Non-separator. 

     

    DJ said Big Slot as well. That is ultimately where I think he makes his money. 

     

    Big slot.  Dont we already have that in Kincaid?   Beane loves redundancy 

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Dislike 1
  5. 20 minutes ago, boyst said:

    the long awaited thoughts...

     

    we have a lot more options which make a lot more sense today with 33 than we did at 28. at 28 we were drafting a first round player with 2nd round talent. it sucks we gave talent to the Chiefs.

     

    OPTION 1

    We keep 33 and draft BPA, move along with the draft like normal

     

    OPTION 2

    We use a 2nd round pick to trade for a WR. This is not likely to be with Aiyuk as the internet is abuzz that the niners won't deal him and only interested in dealing Samuel. No thanks on Samuel.

     

    OPTION 3 - my favortite

    Trade 33 for a 1st round in '25. 1:1 deal would even be fine. Ideally, though, we could trade with a team for their 1st and their second to move back even further. Looking at the big board this is reasonable because the talent on board is BPA but we can squeak back. In this case it rules out getting Mitchell or McConky most likely. But, there are other WR's not far off the same tier.

     

    OPTION 4 - most likely, sort of...

    Double dip on WR.

    Adonai Mitchell / Ladd McConkey - i expect we pick him at 33. But, then come back up and get McConky or wait and get Franklin, McMillan, Polk or Coleman with the other 2nd round pick.

     

     

     

    Only option 4 seems reasonable to me.   If we somehow go out of the first 2 rounds without a WR in a class that's 1)the deepest its been at the position in recent years, and 2) The absolute biggest positional need on the team in recent years,  it just feels like a massive failure.   Trading for another vet just makes me think getting rid of Diggs was a costly mistake

  6. 22 minutes ago, BuffaloBill said:

     

    So Dalton Kincaid is dog food? If the Bills also pick up at least 1 WR in a deep class will Josh still have no weapons?

     

    The worry is that we replace Gabe Davis with...Gabe Davis or worse, another slot guy.  The WRs who have slipped to rd 2 did so for a reason.   And then we possibly will be trading picks to replace a top 10 receiver with a more expensive vet for the ultimately the same production, all the while still paying Diggs' salary.   It makes me a little uneasy that we're going into day 2 of the draft with a bottom 3 receiving unit.   

     

    The end result may work out okay but the process is a bit weird at times. 

     

    Some Examples

    - Giving Justin Jefferson to Minnesota to get Diggs only to hear rumors recently of maybe the Bills trying to trade for Jefferson.   We coulda had the dude on a rookie contract this whole time. 

    - Signing Dawson Knox to a huge contract and then drafting a TE the following season.   

    - Releasing Isiah McKenzie and then singing his equivalent replacement for 3 times the price.

     

     

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  7. Just now, Big Turk said:

    I'm guessing there is something bigger in the works here than what's going on in the draft and the Bills are building capital to pull it off...

     

    Perhaps a trade for a WR on a roster already?

     

    I just don't like the idea of trading for a big name vet.   We're paying several million for a top 10 receiver to not play for us next year, then we're going to trade away draft capital for another top 15 vet and pay them more than we were paying Diggs.   Just doesn't add up IMO. 

  8. 15 hours ago, HappyDays said:

     

    I heard Simms a few weeks ago say that Brian Thomas Jr doesn't have a "squeaky clean" character profile. Doesn't sound like anything real bad but enough to be a concern. But if any character and/or injury concern pushes him down the board the Bills won't be the team to stop his fall.

     

    The Bills will never win a SB under this regime if they pass on BTJ at 28.  

    • Eyeroll 1
×
×
  • Create New...