BillsToast
-
Posts
241 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BillsToast
-
-
Not a bad list but I would rank Jax higher than CLE or IND. Minshew is amazing this year and they beat the Colts.
-
2
-
-
Today is the reason you don't give Allen an A+ last week because this week was an A+. Last week he did great, but it wasn't an A+.
Today is what an A+ looks like. He freaking owned today.
-
1
-
-
Allen's game in the 4th was the stuff of legends. It's that simple
-
2
-
-
The best way to get the last laugh is not to be in the spotlight and beat the daylights out of other teams.
-
3
-
-
16 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Oh no, BLM is energizing voters everywhere for Dems. Trump is way behind in Wisconsin, the heart of the protests. The abortion issue at the state level will mean the people will choose between pro-choice politicians and religious zealots. That’s a battle I think Dems win easily in most states.
RBGs death is energizing women, obviously, as if they were not energized already. The majority of the people in this country are against Trump.
Trump struggles in polls, he was losing the entire time to Hillary. He's up in Rasmussen. The middle sees the chaos and is going against Biden.
Dems are energized because everything for them is religious zealotry about their beliefs. ABORTION!!!! RAGE!!! GINSBERG!!!! RAGE!!!
And yet they hate the institutional religious people who quietly and politely say their political views. They freak out over the old people praying in front of a Planned Parenthood and even physically attack them, let alone scream at them, but somehow they don't see their views are far more zealous and religious than anyone they oppose. I mean when was the last time an old morally conservative person attacked a young person for being in killing a fetus, punched them, threw rocks at them, or cursed them out?
It's pretty comical.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:
It would also hand the Democrats a big issue to run on in every single state. Abortion rights are very popular and Conservatives would see this turn on them pretty quickly.
Most people are low info voters. The people that any party should care about is the middle. Here turning abortion into a state rights issues isn't that big of a deal.
I honestly thought Trump would lose without BLM riots, but this plays to his base more than the Dems. Rallying the base for dems means more votes in NYC and LA, but they won that anyways.
The question is swing states and if Trump's economy is doing ok on election day he's proven more to the rust belt than the dems for jobs.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:
A whole bunch of you people have been screaming that abortion is murder. Well, is it time to “save the babies”?
I doubt it, just more GOP hypocrisy, as if they give a fig about the issue. Just something to scream about like little children.
It is GOP hypocrisy to pay lip service. I actually agree with you. SHOCKING
But Roe v Wade being reversed would just accomplish 2 things:
1. Revert back to state rights
2. Stop the Supreme Court from making laws; which was unconstitutional from the beginning. Only the Congress shall write law
I know legality and following the law is not what liberals want, they want ruling from the bench instead of congressional based laws. But don't worry, you want the rule of law.
-
1
-
-
I love the liberal "hypocrisy" argument.
"It was unfair when it happened to us, so now you must suffer." Isn't that a double hypocrisy? Hahahaha
I love liberal tears. And yes we need to stoop to their level. If I'm called a racist for merely existing they deserve to be insulted.
-
2
-
3
-
-
3 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:
Are you talking about people that support the republican party? People that don't support the republican party tend to be big supporters of things to ensure the health and financial welfare of children.
The ones they let live.
-
7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
Hoax. You said you don’t believe in voter fraud. You did not say, and still haven’t said, that you will not commit such fraud to support your Trumpian agenda. Sad!
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. I don't believe in nor have done, or will commit voter fraud. Unlike like your party.
But don't worry since fraud is a moral question, something you claim you can't know objectively or enforce on others.
It's funny really since you are the party of infanticide and you're worried about morality.
-
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:
I have no idea what that gibberish is supposed to mean. But I know that you haven’t denied that you would commit voter fraud to support your trump agenda. Sad!
Define what a contradiction is... then see if it is.
But I have denied I would commit voter fraud liar.
The party of infanticide explaining morality to me. Pathetic.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
Unfortunately you contradicted that position earlier. You’re like a weathervane on this issue. A supporter of the rule of law, but only to the extent it’s convenient. And the reality is, although you profess not to “believe in voter fraud,” all indications are that you still would commit that fraud to support multiple Trumpian candidates for the same, single seat. You had your chance to deny it, and you chose to do otherwise. Sad.
Define what a contradiction is THEN see if it is. Good luck liar.
-
On 9/15/2020 at 3:59 PM, BullBuchanan said:
COVID:
-
Just now, SectionC3 said:
You’ve taken the phrase out of the context in which you used it. If you meant something other than you are willing to commit voter fraud to support Trump and a different candidate for the same office who supports Trump’s position, then you should have said as much. Unfortunately, based on what you actually said, you are predisposed to commit voter fraud. And that is sad.
You're just lying. Like I said you're the party of murdering live children after birth. I expect you to lie. If you didn't lie I would be more shocked.
But for your sake... I do not believe in voter fraud, or for voting twice. Therefore I'm not a liberal.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:
Dr Fauci says they work. Nuff said
Fauci also said Trump did everything he could for Covid. Nuff said too? O, what a tangled web... you can finish it
-
14 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
Hoax. Those are your own words. You are thinking about committing voter fraud.
And you say you support the rule of law. Sad.
"Other than..." means just 1 person..
14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:Wow, you are just a programmed fox news zombie
I would reply with logic, reason, kindness... but then I realized you are the party of infanticide. That's right the killing of a live baby, but you care about Covid deaths now? How cute.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/may/21/infanticide-bills-put-democratic-governors-hot-sea/
-
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:
Wouldn’t that make it less likely to be a hoax? If she’s not model-worthy, then she probably would be in the Don’s league. Don is not a model, and if she was model-worthy she probably would be out of his league then, right?
So you wouldn’t commit voter fraud? Just making sure. Because you said if there’s another candidate you would vote for them, “too.” Implying, of course, that you would vote for both Trump and the other candidate.
And you think you’re part of the rule of law party. Sad.
You know that's not what I said at all. I would only vote for 1 candidate so this Buds for you...
-
Just now, SectionC3 said:
So you would commit voter fraud? Sad!
-
I don't think anyone believes Trump to be a morally upright man in the Biblical sense.
We just want the right to stop BLM from attacking innocent people
We want the right to stop drag queens from speaking to our children as if it's normal
We believe in the SCIENCE of the XY chromosome
The media by and large is the enemy of the people
I don't want infanticide politicians tell me they care about lives all of a sudden, you don't
We don't want our rights stripped from us to give it to a faceless collective
If it was another candidate other than Trump I would vote for them too.
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
Josh just needs to focus on the game, nothing more. These guys only raise you up to smash you down so if you can get back up they get 3 stories out of you instead of seeing you as just a player improving.
He might be the most improved QB I've seen from year 2 to the 3. He just needs to continue the same improvement, not the yards, but field generalship.
-
1
-
-
@B-Man is the king of great memes.
The "That was me" is so outrageously good. I run out of rep daily from his posts.
-
1
-
-
My guess is he will fight to break the media from their civil immunities. He'll go all in on going after big tech and running a big tent platform of prosperity
How will be perceived by psycho liberals? He's destroying the media's 1st amendment rights, hates private companies and wants to oppress minorities because he's racist.
-
It's so dangerous to be a black in America even Jewish women are pretending to be black to get jobs
-
2
-
1
-
Josh Allen Coming up on ESPN First Take
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Idiot? Nooooo, he's a genius. I mean can you think of how a guy who knows so little about sports is paid millions of dollars? He understands it's about entertainment, not sports knowledge. That's a smart guy even though I can't stand the sight of him or the sound of his voice.
How many other guys know sports far better than him but will never reach his level? He understands the game of TV, not the game of sports.