Jump to content

In Summary

Community Member
  • Posts

    866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by In Summary

  1. 4 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

    The best defense against a strong running game imo is a strong offense.

     

    The Colts dominated both lines of scrimmage. If NE does that it'll be a similar result.

    Barring the return of a healthy Star and a crazed Oliver, the Bills lose the "push" matchup up the middle on both lines. NE very good at executing the long (time) drive.  Bigger concern for the Bills' offense.  Belichick will do everything he can to get into Allen's head and get him to unravel.  

  2. 10 hours ago, ChronicAndKnuckles said:

     

    I don't remember anyone wanting that. Maybe a couple of the random nut jobs we get here, but who the heck doesn't want the Bills to run it? 

     

    Everyone saw Tampa Bay last year and how much Brady benefitted from running it. Fournette should've been the Super Bowl MVP last year. 

     

     

    The pass first, pass always narrative is in part driven by some WGR personalities. 

    • Haha (+1) 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Italian Bills said:

     

    When i opened this thread was not to say that we have to change the way we are playing D, i’m not crazy.. i opened this thread to ask your opinion about using a 4-3 formation here and there using three LBs to rush the passer more and to be more consistent at stopping the run against teams with great backs like Henry, Kamara, Taylor, etc. 
    And those teams don’t have great QBs that can make you pay the price to play that formation few snaps during the game. I do also agree that the nickel is the right asset. 

    For sure I like what you're saying.  If you're getting gouged by the run, throw a little more responsibility on your all-star defensive backfield for a few plays.  Matchups should dictate this.  I just think the Bills are very hesitant to move from the nickel.

    • Like (+1) 2
  4. 35 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    But a bit more base 4-3 against heavy run teams isn't a new idea. It is a ploy they used really successfully against the Ravens in the playoffs. I thought they should have done it more at Tennessee tbh as well. I wonder, a little bit, if the fact Taron had just signed a big deal was a bit of a deterrent when considering taking him out more to put Klein in? We had some of these discussions in the spring when considering whether Zaven Collins and/or JOK made any sense for us at the draft. I am absolutely fine with the Bills being mainly a nickel D. The league is no longer run and stop the run. It is pass and stop the pass. But there are those teams with more limited QBs and great backs who try and take advantage of that by going against the grain and I would like to see a bit more of that Ravens game change up deployed in other situations. Indy feels like one, New Orleans maybe too. I think against New England I'd be more tempted to stick with the 4-2-5 predominantly because I do think Belichick and McDaniels would go right after AJ Klein is he was playing as a 4-3 OLB. 

    • Could be TJ's money but could also be analytics based risk assessment.  Maybe TJ simply guards you against more big plays than would Klein or 3rd LB?  
    • McDermott and Frazier, college and pro secondary players respectively, understand the defensive backfield and are arguably playing to their experience and coaching strengths.  If Klein (or 3rd LB) and TJ were a draw on inherent talent, I'd still expect the coaches to lean TJ/nickel over 4-3.
    • TJ and Poyer aren't afraid to hit so they're not necessarily run game liabilities IMO.  I've joked that Poyer is our most physical linebacker.
    • I like Klein to jumpstart the pass rush if the front 4 are ineffective.  I wouldn't ask that of Edmunds.
    • Most times the Bills have one guy (sometimes two) over 300 lb while the opponent's line has five.  Edmunds and Milano are not Shane Conlan and Jim Haslett.  We're built to stop the premier passing teams and not the two or three premier inside running games.
    • The base 4-3 vs nickel debate is hopefully just about getting past those couple of teams than could derail your playoff seating.  
  5. The Bills won't play three LB's to stop a 12 yard run if it means some remote chance they give up a 30 yard pass play.  Not who they are.  With a 4 man defensive front and not being a blitzing team, no way they play an extra LB just to rush the passer.  The rare occasion is simply an opportunistic changeup, not their bread and butter.  

     

    Yes, I miss seeing an NFL that involved more running and LB play - even the 3-4 the Bills had that necessitated a rush backer.  However, anything short of facing Henry at RB and the Bills will be Nickle start to finish.

    • Like (+1) 1
  6. 37 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

     

    Early on was playing more the role of the 3rd LB.  Once he started playing either Edmunds or Milano's role when they got hurt, he was a different guy.

    Odd that a physical LB who can tackle and rush the passer doesn't have more snaps. Unfortunately he's just not great at running around with his hands up.

    • Haha (+1) 2
  7. Re 2:  Beane and McDermott talk about interchangeability and positional flexibility but the long rangy tackles (Spencer Brown) with quick feet capable of handling  wide 9 technique rushers are a different body type than the snow-plow type guards of years past that we suddenly crave.  I think one of Beane/McDermott/Daboll was trying to evolve the game and positional body type requirement faster than the game would allow.  

     

    The Bills' backs need  interior linemen that can move the D linemen.  Nobody is fast enough to threaten the outside so no over pursuit by defenders to open up cutback lanes. etc.  Opponent DL knows they'll win their 1 on 1 matchups. 

     

    The Bills invested in OT with the Dawkins contract and the draft.  If you had to pick between improving your tackle or guard positions, and you're predominantly a passing team, you can fairly choose tackle - which they did.

  8. 2 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    It's almost like McDermott feels he can't lay down the law and say "fix this" until something shows up as clearly and beyond all argument broken.  But then, as with the run game after the Patriots and Chargers games last season, does he feel he has to back off again and it slides back to the "same ol"?

    Wondering to what degree McDermott gets involved in the offensive game plan.  Does he, or will he now overrule Daboll on anything?  Somebody canned the empty backfield sets after Pittsburgh.  We know he'll take the defense over if needed.

×
×
  • Create New...