Jump to content

JDHillFan

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JDHillFan

  1. That dumbass posts here under the name TIBERIUS.
  2. It seems like you believe you have a sick burn here and by virtue of the thumbs up redtail feels the same. If either of you two geniuses read all the way to the second paragraph you would see that the story has been rated FALSE. What you have achieved here is synonymous with an own goal. Look it up. Smooth work folks. smh/lmao/idiots/butTrump
  3. https://www.google.com/search?q=hyperbole&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari Seems like you might be a touch simple so thought I would help out. You’re welcome.
  4. You are like the great Andrew Cuomo and his covid response - if it saves even one life!* *provided it wasn’t grandma or grandpa.
  5. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/schiff-tiktok-removal-intel-committee We are in the best of hands.
  6. I did not have “it’s fine if our adversaries want to send spy balloons across America” on my “progressive” bingo card. Wow. Trump this/maga that, yada,yada,yada
  7. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/13/gates_stands_by_statement_that_biden_has_been_wrong_on_nearly_every_major_foreign_policy_question.html And he has quite a record in foreign matters if you listen to this Obama cabinet member. Great job! America has never looked stronger!
  8. Who gains more benefit from the intel side? If China decides to take another stab at the balloon run, maybe multiple balloons, what should the US do? Shoot them down as you suggest? Why then, but not now?
  9. I didn’t think there could be anyone of simpler mind than Tiberius. I was horribly wrong. Let’s imagine that China, having shown the US to be unwilling to protect its airspace, now decides to send a jet every now and then. Shall the US let them? Why or why not?
  10. I hereby award you another TIBERIUS for this gem. Kudos! Yeah, the F16’s or whatever jet was used probably just pricked it with a pin. Good thinking!!
  11. Three countries and the Arab world hardly constitute “the whole world”! Thought I would save roundy the typing while he formulates his answer to “why shoot it down at all?” You hate America.
  12. That’s quite a quandary you are in. Simultaneously supporting Taiwan and Xi. Keep us all posted on how that works out.
  13. You just Tiberius’d the hell out of that one. Congrats.
  14. Why do you support the murderous Xi? Do you hate America? You should move to China. Does any of this sound familiar to you?
  15. Why shoot it down? It served no purpose that satellites don’t already serve.
  16. Here’s the next question - if nobody cared about the big bad maga/CCP balloon, why shoot it down at all?
  17. Looks like we can chalk up roundy, li’l billsy, and Tibs as those that have no issues with letting China do whatever they want because they already have satellites after all. Reminds me of the people excited to greet the invaders on top of the LA skyscraper in the movie Independence Day. One question for the CCP balloon enthusiasts - does America look weaker or stronger after this episode? If at all possible please answer that question before invoking Trump.
  18. Well, if it’s in the free press at least we can be confident it’s accurate and fair. https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-ed-note.php/ With a few exceptions here and there of course. CJR probably hates America, cheers for Putin, and should move to Russia.
  19. Tiberius reporting for duty and awaiting marching orders from CNN/good American president 🫡
  20. CLAIM: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is requiring all female student-athletes in the state to provide detailed information about their periods in order to compete in organized sports. AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-desantis-florida-sports-female-athletes-160560972802 Period pearl-clutchers hardest hit.
  21. How long until a media outlet declares doing nothing to be a show of strength by our good American president?
  22. So to you it’s ok for Blake to ask for comment using “I spoke to a fascism scholar” rather than “I spoke to John Smith, a scholar from the local community college”. Care to explain why you think that’s ok when the “journalist” involved has obviously already written the story of the fascist in charge of Florida?
  23. Who were the experts Blake was referring to and what made these people “experts”. Or do you think it’s good enough for Blake to say “I talked to some scholars”? Sounds like a real “journalist” to me.
×
×
  • Create New...