JDHillFan

Hey nedboi @nedboy7 - isn’t this Adam guy one of the YouTube betas that you are a big fan of? Any idea what this means? It sounds scary!

Outstanding post. The world needs more of the love and compassion we have always seen from the billstime’s of the world. Please do what you can to make this tragedy political. Thank you. MAGA BAD.

Worse than J6

He’s got an unusual worldview. That’s the kindest way I can put it.

This might give you some insight:

Can you find anything in the giant world of the Internet that would indicate someone agrees with you as it relates to the concept of a lead in television program? If not, that would make it unique.

Ok. Your incredibly unique interpretation of lead-in, one that allows for a 6 hour gap between shows, was certainly a strength of the Kimmel program and you have schooled me accordingly. Exceedingly well done on your part, straight shooter.

Isn’t it easier to just speak factually? Had you done so you would not have had to spit up what you have done here. You said Jill Stein cost Harris the election. I asked what swing state did Jill Stein prevent Kamala from winning. You said Pennsylvania. Jill Stein got 35,000 votes in Pennsylvania. Trump received the most votes in Pennsylvania of any presidential candidate ever. The Democrat was not going to win no matter how much you wish it were true.

You’ve schooled me with something that nobody else alive believes. Score 1 for you! I do hate seeing a straight shooter like yourself come off as ignorant though. You can educate yourself a little bit here: https://fiveable.me/key-terms/television-studies/lead-in-strategy

It’s not a lead in at all. You don’t understand what a lead in is. You’ve lost the plot. Out of your depth. Truly dimwitted. you should make sure you tell all your friends that Jimmy Kimmel was probably profitable and served as a good lead in for a morning show that starts six hours later.

Do you want to provide the data that proves this or would you like me to provide the data? I’m fine either way.

I like that you believe this. Good morning America benefits by the entire Kimmel audience turning their TV off immediately after the show and then tuning back in first thing in the morning. No channel changers amongst the Kimmelites. No wonder GMA has the highest morning ratings! did you ever imagine yourself arguing that a six hour pause between TV shows serves as a lead in just because you are passionate about your politics? Effing weird.

That’s an angry bunch of people. It’s everyone else’s fault though.

When I see Rolling Stone, I don’t bother reading. They have no credibility. Why do you believe they are a good source? Which swing state did Jill Stein prevent Kamala from winning?

This is FANTASTIC!! Being an ultra partisan doesn’t mean you have to make yourself look like a dipsh*t. Please slow down and stop doing this to yourself. It’s embarrassing.

You stated that Rolling Stone is a very good source. The link I providedshowed you that it’s not. They are as unreliable and biased,as they come. It’s OK if you want to believe what they write despite their lack of credibility.

FEAR THE PROJECT!!

I truly hope he is willing to explain the mechanism of the television lead-in that includes a six hour gap between shows. GOOD HEAVENS!

Are you saying that when the Kimmel show wrapped up on a nightly basis good morning America started right behind it? Or is there a several hour gap lead-in that I am not familiar with? Hard to believe you hit send on that. regarding the profitability of the Kimmel show that you want to imagine is real –it was reported that Colbert was losing 40 million a year. I’m sure Kimmel was raking it in. you are out of your depth

What morning show do you believe was the beneficiary of a Kimmel lead-in? Should be an easy one to answer unless you are out of your depth.

You’ve been trolled. Nicholson meme ALWAYS means serious business. sigh

I wonder if there is such a thing as a Brian Stelter fan. Maybe some effeminate guys out there that enjoy what he does. who knows.

Reminiscent of when you claimed Project Liberal was an economic think tank. You have no idea what you are talking about unless you are trying to redefine “very good source for media”. Embarrassing. https://adfontesmedia.com/rolling-stone-bias-and-reliability/

In a prior post you stated it was “probably profitable”. Any basis for that other than your hopes? Lead in for a morning show, huh? 🤦🏻