JDHillFan

LOL 🤦🏽🤦🏽‍♂️🤦🏽‍♀️

Starr-bills has already taken a swing at making it a media-driven matter. Laughable, obviously, but it’s nice that he put the “thought” out there. The entertainment question now - which of the board’s “progressives” will be the first to blame Trump if the market takes a dump? Truly hoping it doesn’t happen but it will be interesting to watch the lefties spin.

You are in your mid 60s allegedly. You have claimed different ages in the past so it’s not a certainty. At what age did you lose the ability to define what a woman is? Seems like a problem that never existed until the last 5 years or less. embarrassing

Karl Rove of the last 15 years is as much a savant as you and you’ve been wrong every step of the way. In this instance, Rove’s “savant” level prediction could be made by a polecat.

We. LOL.

We can all agree that anyone (Frankish) that believes Biden to be mentally fit is delusional.

Embarrassing

Pretty tortured explanation to minimize the slaughter of tens of thousands on Biden’s watch because the orange man is bad. Whatever you have to tell yourself in service to your political preferences.

Do you feel she’s not up to facing adversity? Because she’s a woman? Misogyny has truly found a home on the left. Sad. Embarrassing.

Always with the dramatics. How will anyone ever take you seriously?

Why is it not as bad? You equate Trump’s actions with allowing people to be slaughtered as a result of dawdling? How, in your mind, does that work? I’m eager to hear your thoughts on this.

A serious failure by the Biden administration. Total disaster. I’m sure future President Harris has a better plan.

Maybe the markets have some inside information on this breaking story. Yikes.

Maybe it’s a transitory situation. Let’s wait for the talking points to be issued before getting all crazy.

Sure. A trans-warrior like yourself doesn’t know the most publicized trans lightning rod of the decade. Very believable.

I’m sorry that your position is so weak that you have to resort to being wholly disingenuous. It’s better to not respond than be so childish. You are one that would be considered book-smart, correct?

Leah Thomas had no significant physical advantage over women?? Ignore what you want so badly to believe and tell me what you know to be true even though you are not an “expert”. Also, you have told us you are a moral person. Why is it morally ok to put girls in a position that they must compete athletically against males?

What makes one an expert at the state school board level as it relates to letting boys compete against girls? Don’t you care about girls that work hard to excel on a level playing field only to have an “expert” then tilt the field? Why is it ok to sh*t on girls so that one or two anomalous people can feel better by beating them? It makes no sense. Tell me why it’s ok without going to the “expert” crutch.

How about at the high school level or a Leah Thomas situation? Ok with it if the ruling bodies deem it so?

But you are ok with a sporting body ruling against a cis-woman that might have elevated testosterone levels Got it.

Earlier in the thread you were talking down to everyone about a cis-woman not meeting their expectations and now you suggest that criteria centered around testosterone levels and similar seem reasonable. That’s an interesting thing you’ve got going.

Do you support the notion that it is appropriate for those born as male to compete in women’s athletics? It’s ok to say yes or no. You seem reluctant to do so.

“I’m going to prove how little I care by posting about how little I care so that 12 strangers can see”. Nice.

Coming in the next few minutes from good Catholics Roundy, Redhawk, and the like…”Yes! Exactly!”

It takes a biologist. That’s a new thing here in the early part of the 21st century. Prior to that it required no scientific background.