McGee Return TD
-
Posts
520 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by McGee Return TD
-
-
Suzy Q's or Fat Bob's
Freddie J's is also pretty good but they (he?) don't serve as much BBQ as they used to... still have ribs, though, that are great.
-
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:
Props to Graham for inviting Mueller to testify.
-
5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:
Honest to Pete, buddy, I am not the person down here who is gonna take the time to do the "can you find" crap. You started posting in PPP 21 minutes after you signed up on TBD. You sound like former banned members. You start nitpicking words... your entire "body of work" under this alias sounds like #OrangeManBad. If you do not mean for it to sound like #OrangeManBad, fix it by posting on sources, not on feeling. And if you do not know what I mean by that, go back and read the 63 posts you currently have - the ones that have to do with the Trump administration, and President Trump.Pete is delighted with your honesty. If my entire body of work sounds like #OrangeManBad, you're unable to accept the opinions of those who disagree with you, and that's an unfortunate way to go through life. Have a good weekend Buffalo_Gal
-
2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:
You do not have to be. It is honestly good for the sub-forum if you are not, provided the lack of support isn't based on #OrangeManBad. IOW, when the lack of support is based on policy instead of, "He drinks diet Coke, not wine!" that is fabulous. Policy differences (no one likes everything) form the basis for some great discussions. "I don't like his accent", does not.Thanks. Can you point to the posts where I criticize Trump on something other than policy that led you to believe I am a fraud?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:
Nope. If you read Row, he's very smart sometimes, very odd sometimes, and very sardonic sometimes. However, it is all under one account alias.
You, however, simply sound like er, "others" who were banned.I don't sound like a Trump supporter, you mean?
-
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:
She's asking if you're a new poster or if you're an old poster with a new name. There have been a small number of folks who have come down here to troll, then changed their names when they get exposed as such (or when they're too embarrassed by their previous posts and want to hide). So, it's a legit question to ask.
I've been operating under the premise that you're new and legit. Hope I'm right.
I've lurked TBD for probably a dozen years and signed up for an account before this year's draft. I can probably even name some of the posters you are thinking of.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:
Is that why you appear to have multiple personalities on occasion?Do you assume everyone is 5 or 6 different people?
-
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:
How many posts do you have access all your account aliases?English, please
-
6 minutes ago, row_33 said:
you have to go and get a job and live a productive life now
23,200 posts by you in a little over 2 years... I'll let you do the math on how much time you waste here.
-
1
-
-
Just now, row_33 said:
i would agree you are totally wasting every second of your life on this crap
I would agree you are adept in hyperbole and understand why many on here have you blocked.
-
Just now, row_33 said:
you should email Mueller and point out what he has that is worth pursuing.
Just got a response from Peter Carr... No comment
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:
Mueller report clearly sets out there was not any evidence to make the case for either.
I guess we disagree. I take the Mueller report at it's word when it says the office did not focus on collusion...
..."collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the U.S. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute. For that reason, this Office's focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term ‘collusion.’"
If Mueller ever takes the witness stand, we'll find out for sure.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:
there was no evidence of conspiracy (and by extension collusion which is meaningless).
The law disagrees with this. Collusion can be related to a number of crimes that are not conspiracy.
-
12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
"Trump's narrative" that there was no collusion or conspiracy -- that's false. That's not a narrative, those are now the proven facts.
Doesn't Mueller in his report specifically say they did not address collusion because it falls outside the scope of criminal liability?
Edit: did not
-
So you can't list out a couple basic facts he ignored?
-
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:
That's untrue.
When basic facts are ignored in order to satisfy one's pre-formed conclusions bothers me.
What basic facts did Bob ignore?
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:
It's nonsense. Almost every word.
As has become obvious, any idea that does not recognize the "deep state" is nonsense to you.
-
2
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:
What is abundantly clear is that Barr is a political ally of the president. The best that can be said about Barr's testimony is, if he didn't lie, he was certainly intentionally misleading. He could have been much more forthcoming regarding his interactions with Mueller if his goal was to be totally transparent. It appears to me that Barr wanted to maintain Trump's narrative of 'No Collusion, No Obstruction' for as long as possible for Trump's political benefit.
It was also very telling when he said 'WE did not waive executive privilege'. He sees himself as the the President's lawyer and protector. Trump finally has his Roy Cohn.
This is a solid post. I like your thinking, Bob.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Cruise ship in St. Lucia quarantined over confirmed measles case
St. Lucia Coast Guard confirmed the vessel bears the same name as one owned and operated by the Church of Scientology. -
Nice of Lindsay Graham to start off the hearing by saying he has yet to read the full redacted Mueller report.
-
-
38 minutes ago, DC Tom said:
Funny how that Mueller letter story is published by the Post and NYT simultaneously, the night before Barr's hearing.
...and The Wall Street Journal.
37 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:No funny business there.
The coup rolls on -- but they've been defanged. Soon they will be fully exposed and then the fun will begin in earnest.
Is WSJ part of the coup attempt?
-
3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:
Barr is scheduled to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee tomorrow. The House on Thursday.
Tomorrow is a public hearing that allows Democrats to ask questions of Barr, correct?
-
There will be fireworks tomorrow if Barr has the balls to show up
Kentucky Derby Predictions?
in Off the Wall Archives
Posted
[Tacitus, Win Win Win, By My Standards]
Tax is my favorite longshot - might be the fastest horse in the race on dry ground. [Improbable, Tax, Code of Honor] trifecta #2