daz28

LOL. I defined it using a dictionary(like most people define things by), not "dem media" as you claim. Why were they wandering inside the Capital, and who invited them in? Was violence involved? Hopefully you're past the delusion that the police, Antifa, and FBI did. You know that Colorado case(I believe you brought up), where the judge said he never took a Constitutional oath, but instead a presidential oath, and that's why he can't be disqualified? That judge said not only was there an insurrection, but affirmed the petitioners' claims that Trump had incited and engaged in it. That judge was appointed by a guy who was on the House Liberty Caucus(the rightest of the right). Outside of 2 or 3 whacko commentaries from The Washington examiner and the likes, you're hard pressed to find anyone claiming it wasn't. I'll guess the world will just have to ignore dictionaries, and take your word for it. Takes a big man to call someone a complete moron on the internet.

Wait, you believe Manafort when he said he did what he did just for money, and Trump didn't know? I don't think he has that kind of nads. I think Hillary loses regardless. Bad candidate, but I believe she had a chance before the Comey thing.

I can see this is a clear derail attempt, but you know that whatever Fylnn said to Kislyak was, without question, Trumps orders. What they were discussing involved another nation, Israel. So there was clearly communications about official business, before the official business market opened. I would certainly want my country to investigate to what the length and depth of these calls. Who made them, how many were there really, and how far back did they go?? ALL certainly valid questions. Ok, now you can rant about the DOSSIER like you wanted to when you baited someone in, and completely ignore the facts I just laid down. This just means that Doocy is now a deep date rino when you run it through the Truth social decoder.

I posted here before that split up, so no thanks. I can definitely say yes he does drop terds here, and they eat them right up. I avoid that, and only stick to things that are big current events. I have no interest proving one side is better than the other. That's the reason WHY Washington is the mess it is, and there's no need to watch it on a smaller scale here.

Yes, but there is some evidence that it may be true, so the notion that Biden is corrupt isn't an allegation. What is things people that accuse other people of word salad say for $100 Alex. 🤣🙄

What's embarrassing is the right-wing media convinced ignorant people that the VP flies around the world creating his own policy. The VP is a surrogate to the executive(ie the President). It's funny how the right-wing talking points get likes and thumbs up, while actual well known facts get haha's.

I said the exact same thing on Facebook. If they didn't indict, you'd conveniently call these SAME people the deep state. See how that works.

I'm calling it what the dictionary calls it. How many times do I have to repeat the US code is undefined. Maybe you don't understand what that means? Believe it or not, I formulate my own ideas. You and Doc are just repeating the rollback/reeling in that the GOP put out to the incredibly stupid gaffe MJ made. I'm pretty sure that you guys were mad Dems were donating to funds for the defense of rioters, and 1000% sure that if Nancy Pelosi was blurring out the faces of rioters, you wouldn't be singing this same tune. Ok, now your turn to once again try to paint me as a Dem apologist, because I'm exposing your bias/hypocrisy.

No, this is not even close to the same thing as Colorado. I already covered that, the code you showed is an undefined code. I'm not even trying to make the claim of armed insurrection. Any other dodges, besides the ones the GOP put out? Let someone else pull the railway switches for once

This guy couldn't be more right.

Again, again, again, again, which has nothing to do(is unrelated) with what Mike Johnson is doing.

This has truly ran across several tracks, and has run its course.

Like I said, the smoke around Biden is always real, but when its Republicans, it's fake news. This is all about your bias, and that's about it. Here's what went down in real time in case you forgot, even though I have no idea why I'm letting you draw me so far off topic(well I do have an idea lol): the US Central Intelligence Agency had concluded that bin Salman had ordered the murder.[1] In the same month, the United States levelled sanctions against 17 Saudis over the murder, but did not sanction bin Salman himself.[16] President Donald Trump disputed the CIA assessment, expressed support for bin Salman, and stated that the investigation into Khashoggi's death had to continue Now, I'm not sure you understand a lot about business, but tell me if this is plausible: bin Salman: "remember that real estate kid, who was somehow the Middle East envoy, that was really tough on us at every turn? Well, I liked his ties, and I think we ought to invest billions with him. Even though making a little bit of money from his business is absolute chump change to us. I'd like to invest in his company anyways." Because you love me repeating myself so much, I'll keep doing it for you: I don't know if/what the quid pro quo was, but I'm also not naive. So you're saying the GOP is/should be sitting on evidence of misdoings, while allowing a crooked Biden to stay in power, because the election is 11 months away? And that's fine?? Maybe it's just easier to admit that they're allegations at this point.

If the accusations against Joe weren't just allegations, do you think the GOP would have voted on impeachment yet????????? Only in your head has anything been proven yet.

You do realize half of what helps identify grainy/distant video is things like gait and demeanor. If you're suggesting they block out everything, except those distant, grainy faces, then you'd be investigating every guy calling saying, "I dunno that kinda looks like Bill down the street" on his Facebook page. Anyways, like I've already said(again again), this is about what Mike Johnson is doing, not how the FBI is finding suspects. You may as well be asking me why some people like sprinkles

LOL, I don't know if maybe you're used to speed reading, so you skip words, but I already said this was about the perception of it(especially yours), and that I wasn't claiming anything. While the rest of the woke world is overdoing it with pancake syrup and the likes, I don't think working with murderers qualifies as woke. Just so you know, you know as much about whether that $2B was politically leveraged as me or the man on the moon does. To think that he got that money for being extremely tough on them politically is laughable. That's the nature of business relations, not some conspiracy stuff/unproven allegations that I heard about.

That's an allegation by you, and you know nothing about what kind of parent he is. I'm 100% certain this is heartbreaking for him to have this happen to the only son he has left. The guys been through tragedy you could never understand, but it seems you'd prefer not to even try to. I don't care if you like his son that you don't even know, but as a human this is sad. That's also "reality".

Maybe you could make a "how to parent bigly" video, that he can watch and learn from. Bro, that's just harsh, because the guy has already lost a son.

I'm believe I mentioned this like 3x already: security. Why don't we reveal all of the security cameras/footage from schools and banks while we're already out doing incredibly dumb things.

Tbf, that was probably what was supposed to happen at that time. Now I'd like to know the reasoning behind that original sweetheart deal he was offered. Weiss is Trump's guy, which is weird. We're lucky that the judge and prosecutor questioned it, or he'd have gotten wayyy less than anyone else would have. That deal also only had 2 misdemeanors, and one felony. Maybe foreign agent charges this time? Hmmm

Ok, now do we wait for the trial, or do we claim this is a politically driven case engineered by the radical, right maga DOJ, who's trying to destroy Joe's campaign in 2024 on our social media site? 🤣😉 Edit: I forgot to add, whose christo-fascist agenda that is destroying our country(we won't have one anymoar) !!!!!!!!!

Well, I guess Gymbo now knows why they didn't want morgan and Daly deposed about an ongoing investigation. It's almost like a gym teacher, who sees the deep state in his toast, should learn something about how investigations, prosecutions, and evidence works. But I want the cookie NOW!

I didn't claim anything, I was pointing out the perception of it, which you may or may not have been ignoring, because you appear to not like when Hunter Biden is doing it. ie I was testing to see if you have a preferred 'side' when it comes to justice. Personally, I don't want the Bidens OR Trumps doing it. As for going after political rivals, are you referring to the Trump administration investigating Trump/Russia, or the Biden administration investigating Hunter??? Oh, you must mean the 'deep state', so you can just assign any nonsense unproven conspiracy garbage whenever it's convenient. Also, it seems convenient of you to say the investigation into Kushner was legit, and done properly, that found nothing, but claim in different investigations the democrats are unfair, lying, and corrupt. It's called picking and choosing for your own benefit, and it's a bad look. Just try to just stick to the facts that you can prove.

No what's worst is running the clock out on a subpoena until you're in power, and then thinking subpoenas are somehow legit once again, because now you're the party handing them out. This ain't a matter of who sucks more, it's a matter of who's withholding the truth, and using nefarious means to skirt the laws. NONE of them are above the law, including Eric Holder, if you think for some strange reason I was thinking he should be, even though I have zero clues as to why you might be thinking that.

I don't have a "side", so showing me what one side did wrong to justify the other side doing it wrong holds no water with me. Wrong is always wrong. Not sure why I have to repeat myself.