.jpg.d1f9b8865c9f6283096fcacc94e80160.jpg)
Florida Bills Fanatic
-
Posts
1,385 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Florida Bills Fanatic
-
-
13 hours ago, BillsBlue said:
I agree it's a big game, I'll be there in attendance, to me this game is similar to the Bengals game, this is a middling opponent that can get hot and we get a chance to see if our team is smoke and mirrors or if it handles business again against an average team(not great not terrible but average). This game will reveal alot about what the team is made of. If we come out and roll over them we are completely legit imo. If we struggle a lot I might begin worrying about some of the other games on our schedule a bit more....what really is important to me is this is another good bit of practice for the offense to further figure things out and tune up for New England week 16 and the other tougher teams on our schedule jmo
I agree with you completely. In addition, Bills can't afford for Daboll to have another first half clunker. Philly is missing some players from their front seven and have been more vulnerable to the run game and screens. Given all of this plus the horrible secondary, there is no reason to be predictable or one dimensional.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, HOUSE said:
Also reduced using the coefficient of friction for the air and leather ball (or cat fur), just sayin'
-
There are some guys that we may think of being rather obscure but they are talented guys in a bad situation. Guys like Paul Richardson in Washington or David Moore in Seattle could be available for a decent price. I don't expect Beane to mortgage the farm to buy second or third tier guys that may be available. Raiding someone's practice squad may be more likely than anything at this point.
-
2 hours ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:
I did have a piece of cheesecake this morning, but I feel fine. Maybe I'll just hydrate a bit before going anywhere.
If you had washed it down with a shake from Anderson's, you'd be my new hero!
-
I thought that they got away from the running game too much. They had pretty good success with Gore off right tackle and then stopped going there. Allen also had a couple of nice gains on the right side as well. Miami brought a lot of blitzes up the middle which left the center of the field open. You'd expect the slot receiver or a tight end to make the correct read and run the hot pattern in behind the blitzing linebacker. I only saw that happen once during the game. It also appeared that Allen had a lot of time on several plays and didn't have an open receiver. Other than Brown, the receivers played poorly today. As others have already pointed out, Daboll had a really bad first half. It almost seemed that the Bills were expecting that Miami would just mail in the game.
With all of that said, it's still pretty cool to be 5 and 1.
-
3 hours ago, Mr. SpacePuppy said:
I’ve watched everyone. I suggest you take you rose colored glasses off when your watching.
I suggest you go back and watch again, particularly the New England game. Please pay close attention to the plays when Brady was chased from the pocket and had to run out to his right and throw the ball away. There were several of these in the game. You'll notice that he was unable to step up into the pocket as he normally does because Oliver had quick penetration. I understand that fans want to see sacks and quarterbacks knocked on their backsides but forcing a throw away on third down to get the defense off the field is also a great outcome. It's also interesting to notice the lack of double teams on Hughes this year. Teams recognize that they can't slide the guard out to help on Hughes and reach block Oliver with the center. Oliver's quickness prevents this. IMHO Oliver is doing exactly what the Bills drafted him to do and I bet that they are very pleased with him.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, CaptnCoke11 said:
No team is trading for that contract with little production
You are exactly correct. In addition, he's an UFA next year. Why trade any assets for a guy who isn't getting the job done and will be able to walk next year ( unless franchised) ? These insane potential trade posts get ridiculous. People seem to want Beane to chase every guy that a team wants to dump. Unless there is a rash of injuries, I don't expect Beane to make any deals that involve giving up draft picks or significant amounts of cash. He is setting up to sign the best of our own and make significant draft additions. We've watched him for a couple of years now and the strategy seems to be pretty clear. Given the results to this point, I'm okay with his approach.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Never NEVER Give-up said:
If I were him, I'd sue the league for $10MM per year for as many years I felt I could have played plus treble damages. Very provable, smacks of racism too.
A law suit at this point in time would be a fool's errand. He terminated his last contract. His play had deteriorated and was no longer as effective as he had been earlier in his career. He had also gone on record about the type of payment that he would require. From the owner's perspective, he had alienated a significant percentage of the NFL's customer base and many of their sponsors. It isn't hard to understand why 32 owners felt that having him around wasn't worth the hassle. Proving a concerted effort by the owners to keep him out of the league, is not easy to prove contrary to popular belief. Lastly, getting to play in the NFL isn't a right that belongs to any individual. As far as the claim of racism toward an organization that has minorities as the majority of their employees, it would be a significant uphill fight in court.
Personally, I wouldn't have been upset with him getting a shot to prove himself in a training camp. He had the right to protest to draw attention to a problem that is important to him. I don't think he anticipated that his actions during the national anthem would result in the severe push back that it received. I would have picked a different method to protest.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Most of these shows are unwatchable. They fail to focus on relevant information about the game that you are watching or the games that are in progress. Having four or five people sitting on a table and all trying to talk or goof around is useless. I used to enjoy Tom Jackson and Chris Berman on ESPN.
-
4
-
-
2 hours ago, DrDawkinstein said:
It was indeed Roughing the Passer according to the modern rules. I said "Thats a flag" the second i happened, and sure enough.... Even if "unavoidable" (which I agree with)
The idea that an OL would purposely throw a Defender into his own QB's knees is a bit ludicrous. That OL would be cut immediately.
I don't disagree that the rule is pretty nondescript about hitting the player low. It does not delineate any exceptions. I have to admit that I have seen other hits not called where the blocker provided the impetus for the collision. Unless the rule is altered to call out exceptions, the most we can hope for is to call it consistently.
-
He fills several needs for the offense that many of the posts have identified. One of the more subtle things that he improves is the blocking on running plays. He is a willing blocker with a more physical presence than Zay or any of the other receivers. Although we didn't see it on Sunday, he's the kind of blocker that can make bubble screens a real weapon. I'll be very interested to see how much he is used in the future
-
2
-
-
Make their linebackers play coverage in the passing game. This will require some passing on first down and throws to the backs and tight ends. Bills should be able to take advantage of some of those match ups when they are in their base defense. Protecting the ball is an absolute necessity.
-
11 hours ago, matter2003 said:
A large part of the problem are deep drops and Allen holding the ball too long.
You are right on point about the deep drops. Allen also does a poor job on blitz recognition and finding the hot receiver. Hopefully, he will improve that with experience. Overall, my eye test tells me that the line has played pretty well. As fans, we have a tendency to dwell on the plays that disappoint us, especially if they cost us a scoring opportunity or result in a turnover. For those who suggest that the o- line isn't greatly improved over last season, I recommend a trip to the optometrist for your own eye test. For me, the data tells most of the story.
-
O-line is much improved. They are made to look bad at times by Allen's unwillingness to get the ball out on time. Inconsistent play from the receivers has impacted Allen and the o-line at times. It is a mystery to me as to why Zay Jones ever sees the field. He is pathetic. The defense is as good as we all hoped they would be. It would be good to get more sacks but overall we should be pretty pleased. Special teams still need a lot of work. Our punter is just plain bad and he should have been replaced. House Money has been anything but that also. The biggest problem right now appears to be Allen's inability or unwillingness to avoid boneheaded plays. Two weeks in a row he took big losses on third down which took the team out of field goal range. He continues to throw into tight double and triple coverage, giving up game changing interceptions. If he's too stubborn or dumb to figure out that he is hurting the team, they should bench him for a while. His bad decisions more than offset any of the great plays that he makes. That needs to change.......
And then there is Frank Gore. He has been much more than I ever expected him to be. No doubt that he should be a first year hall of fame inductee when he hangs it up. I love watching the guy play.
-
If the Bills ever hope to become seriously competitive in the league, they need to become ruthless competitors. In this game, it means pounding Edelman in the ribs on every play from the start of the game until he goes to the bench. It also means doing what is necessary to put hits on Brady throughout the game, even if it means taking a couple of penalties. They also need to make Gilmore play running plays that are directed right at him. He is not a physical guy and not a willing tackler. It only takes effort to be physical with the other team and it may just take their skilled players off their game.
-
7 hours ago, rayray808 said:
We all come with a bias on these message boards of being Bills fans... some loved him when drafted, some hated, and most had their doubts... but out of curiosity - what would need to happen for you to finally sit back and be like "alright, Josh Allen is the franchise"
My answer: eliminate head scratching turn overs, and at a minimum split the season series with the Pats but be relevant in both games
That's a great start but I would add getting consistently good performances through a couple of seasons, win in the playoffs, and be among the league leaders is several passing categories on a regular basis.
-
I can't see Beane spending the money, draft picks, or giving away any of the current players for Melvin Gordon. No question that he is good when he is on the field. The problem is staying healthy and on the field. I can't see anyone paying him the money that he wants.
-
1 hour ago, I am the egg man said:
Fact is Brown was free to sign with any team he wanted.
That he was officially released at 4:15 and signed by the Patriots within minutes makes the NFL look like a deer in headlights. But that's how it works.
Hard to believe that all of this happened in a really short period of time, including negotiating and writing a contract. If there was ever a smoking gun to investigate tampering, this would be the one to look at. Add this to the AB circus surrounding the sexual assault investigation and it makes me very glad that the Bills didn't end up with this guy.
-
1
-
-
Having too many promising players before the cut down, is a nice problem to have. For a number of years, we were relegated to watching the cuts from other teams in hopes of adding much needed talent. I like this circumstance much better. It's hard to find much wrong with Beane's work at this point. Right now, I'm guessing that picking up a punter from waivers is near the top of Beane's list.
-
4 hours ago, klos63 said:
Osweiler was just brought in to hold down the fort until the Colts were able to contact Brandon Weeden and Matt Cassell.
What you are suggesting doesn't make sense? Do you really think any of those three guys are being brought in to be the season long backup? Personally, I don't see it but I guess time will tell.
-
2 hours ago, HOUSE said:
I am watching on the radio
Left knob 16
Right knob 10
It's the XM radio phone app for me. I'll have another game on tv (muted of course).
-
2 hours ago, bilzfancy said:
No, Phillip Walker is still there and has looked better then Kelly
If the Colts were in agreement with you, Osweiler would not have been brought there.
-
Sometimes we look for conspiracies where the simple straight forward common sense facts are the most logical and correct explanation for the situation. The Colts were hoping to talk him out of retiring. This wasn't about a single year of season ticket sales to hose the local fans for a year. This was about trying to keep the most valuable asset of their organization. The financial impact to the Colts will occur over multiple years until they are able to obtain a player of his value. In the end, it came down to a young guy that had already made a ton of money, who had been seriously hurt a number of times, who was tired of the tedious rehab processes, and his job wasn't fun for him anymore. For any of us who have quit a job that we didn't like, this shouldn't be too hard to understand. Life in the NFL doesn't last forever, it's just that this promising NFL life ended sooner that fans wanted it too.
-
3
-
-
7 hours ago, ScottLaw said:
MARIO WAS A VERY GOOD PLAYER HERE WELL WORTH THE CONTRACT.
What were you people watching when he was here?
Mario was not worth the money he was paid. He played okay when he played but his best days were behind him. He was not the dominating guy you would expect from that level of pay. He certainly didn't help lead the team to the playoffs. I watched him very closely and I watched a number of other players walk down the road because Buffalo didn't have cap space to keep them.
Josh Allen is not a running back
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
QB runs at the wrong time have been a hallmark of Daboll's ineffective play calling. He continues to set up an empty backfield on first and second downs that invites a blitz from the defense. Daboll continues to frustrate me. In the first series of the game, he comes out trying to run Gore into the strength of the defense that had the box loaded. The Philly secondary has been horrible in coverage all year and he decides to establish a running threat before trying to pass. He did nothing to back off the safeties and linebackers. Eagles have been susceptible to weak side screens, seam routes, and passes to backs in the flat that are run underneath deeper routes. If the fans understand, this why can't Daboll.? Running the QB into a stacked defense has been ineffective except for a couple of red zone plays.