Yet, when the child and mother agreed not to get chemo last week many were upset over that decision. Also, you still choose to ignore the rights of a child that is viable, and the reasons why a child can be killed in the third term. Your arguement leads me to believe that is a mother suffers from PPD they should have the right to kill the baby up to a point where the child can be self sufficient. What is that 2, 5, 12, 16???? You know there are laws now that if you kill a pregnant woman you will be charged with 2 murders not one. Why is there a conflict here?
As far as the other it really wasn't worth commenting on. Because the good done by the MLK's, Ghandis and Mother Theresa's far outweigh the bad done by Dahlmer, Bundy, mansons, etc....