VABills

Wrong. Have you read their oath: The baby is also their patient. On top of that doing ill-will to the baby in the third trimester especially when it is viable goes against their oath.

Well the OP listed the scum killer as a right-wing extremeist. I see it's okay for him to assume and generalize, but when someone who doesn't agree with your views it's not. hypocrite.

No he said JP has a chance to be a very good player. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/walkthrough/2006/jaws-ii Not exactly a ringing endorsement, especially when you're actually getting paid to work with the guy.

No, and I doubt he will. Just another military guy that we know this admin has shown time and again not to care for and done everything to minimize them.

No that came from multiple websites. Including his own clinics site which is magically now unavailable. Maybe his boasting is what got him into trouble, and they're going to change the content. Look around I am sure there is a spiper with what the contents of his site had, but mental issues was one of the reasons he listed as why a 3rd trimester abortion is permitted by him. Also, way to ignore the fact that if the mother is in such danger why does the babies 60% survival rate at 24 weeks take a lower priority over a mother who may/may not survive regardless? How many MLK Jr's, Ghandis, Mother Theresa's have been killed for convienence and "mental distress".

What about the far left radical muslim who shot up the recruiting center yesterday killing the guy who just got back from boot camp.

And there should be none. If the life of the mom/child are at risk then other options can be used to save the life of a child in the third tri-mester. By that point the survival rate is through the roof (60%+). if there is such grave danger to the mother because of the baby then what are her chances of living, and why should the mothers life take precidence over the life of the child. BTW, this sack of crap would abort babies in the third trimester due to mental issues of the mother. If the mother was depressed through his 3 day evaluation, then that was cause enough for him.

What I don't get is some on the left who have no problems killing babies but get all up in arms if you throw a little water in the face of a terrorists. What a !@#$ed up world we live in.

They don't count. They don't have oil and don't pay taxes, so what good are they?

So Dick Cheney who you and many others on your side, has been wrong about everything his whole life according to you. Now that he comes out in line with your thinking is right? Maybe he's wrong about this too.

He didn't. His clinic in Kansas performed abortions only. They were not a full service clinic. Death only, no life. he was proud of of 60K+ abortions to include 10K+ 3rd term abortions.

And , where have I said it was right to kill this guy? I just don't think we should cry over his death and I certainly don't think we should be eulogizing this scum.

http://www.catholic.org/international/inte...ry.php?id=32250 There are thousands of links with him reporting to do over 60K abortions and 10K late term abortions (you know the babies in the 3rd trimester). He was proud of killing all those babies.

http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/12895 George Tiller has claimed 60,000 abortions performed in Kansas and 10,000 late term abortions, his own words. A late term abortion at Tiller's clinic can run as much as $26,000.00, a standard abortion runs around $2500.00- If we take an average figure of $3000.00 and multiply that by 60,000 we end up with a gross of 180 million dollars, which is not bad for a Doctor disciplined for alcohol and drug abuse. And of course that would explain how Tiller could put 1.2 million into the last election cycle. I think a gross of 180 million qualifies as an important Kansas industry. You shold do so well in your lifetime Doctor.

And if you don't give him credit for the good that came out of his dictatorship, how can you give him credit for the millions murdered.

BTW, I just read this guy performed 60,000 abortions in his life. When did he actually have time to deliver babies. I am betting this guy never did. He was in it for one purpose only, to take life. With numbers like that, yes he is in the Hitler range.

Actually I believe if you hire someone to murder now you too can be charged with murder. And yes.

This scum was not like MLK. He is much closer to Hitler.

Let's see a man who lives his life killing babies everyday for the convienence and for money vs. one who kills one time to save babies. I don't know you tell me?

No, I am not happy. However, I don't think he should ne eulogized. He is a scum of epic proportions.

What's the difference? They all look the same to me.

No but Hitler did a lot of good along with his evil ways. Autobahn, VW, rockets, medical experiments that a lot of good research came from and still is respected and used today, jet propulsion, full employment, a lot of family values instilled. Just because someone does some good doesn't mean they aren't an evil monster.

The point of the thread being, it's bad to kill a murderer, but good to kill unboarn babies. Why should this thread die with your word being the last and an incorrect conclusion may I add.

I don't agree that he should have been killed. But to many, what abortion doctors do is worse that Hitler. Think about how many babies are killed for convienence every year. Hitler and crew killed what 10 millions Jews in a 6 year period. How many babies are killed worldwide every year but these scum? 5 million? To some what these doctors do is far worse than what Japan did in China during WWII, or what Hirler did in Europe. Take your liberal glasses off and look through someone elses eyes and how they look at this.

Who said the mother was innocent. This is like someone hiring a hitman to do their dirty work. Both are guilty.