Pokebball
-
Posts
3,085 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Pokebball
-
-
3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Based on his entire life. He’s a mobster. We almost always win against them on financial charges. He’s no different
This is the definition of the ends justifying the means
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:
You seem as upset as I feel celebratory. Relax. A vile criminal is getting his comeuppance. I’m Listening to trump spew lies in twisted English. And the MAGAs will lap it up and never question his statements. To them, truth doesn’t matter.
A vile criminal? Based on this trial? Like I said...
The ends are justifying the means for you
-
1
-
3
-
-
17 hours ago, B-Man said:
Does anyone doubt that the “cackling hens here, see Roundy, Muppy, et al,would have come down to PPP if the verdict had been reversed
No.
they are the weakest type of poster.
I have to say that the response from either side was probably predictable, right? I'm sad for the state of our country today.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:
Standard practice in NYS courts.
I believe the concern is that if the jurors have a copy of the instructions they’ll focus on that instead of the actual evidence.so go to the judge each time they have a question about the instructions?
-
2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
There is sustained debate of whether or not this case is purely political, whether or not Bragg took a novel approach to prosecuting this case, and decisions made by the judge throughout the course of the trial. You then chose one statement, as reported, to suggest discussions on bias are unreasonable based on a system you, yourself, have raised questions about.
this x 1000
-
3
-
-
31 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
What if the jury instruction, based on New York law, is "was concerned?" In other words, 55% concerned about Melania, 45% about the election. It seems that would do, wouldn't it?
Add it all up to achieve "beyond a reasonable doubt"?
-
14 minutes ago, BillStime said:
🎯
Still peddling the bloodbath lie. What's that tell you about Kamala?
-
1
-
-
21 hours ago, Doc said:
No need to lie. Biden's got a terrible track record to go after, not just empty promises for when he gets into Office.
This is just the thing. There is enough truth and reality to hit Biden with. Biden's the one peddling daily lies.
47 minutes ago, Doc said:And Biden won't use gross exaggerations and anecdotal nonsense?
Come on man
-
6 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:
Lol at all the Dem influencers posting edited photos trying to imply Trump's rally wasn't packed. Purposely cutting out the time stamp that shows it was 7 hours prior.
always trying to "create" the news rather than reporting the news. And note this is one of the largest MSMs, ABC
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
My personal finances and investments couldn't be better!
THANKS BRANDON!
Mine can. Mine can always be better
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Still better than censoring factual speech on the floor of the House that criticizes the private citizen king, but let's talk about what the CIA may or may not have done. Remember when trump's CIA director destroyed the video evidence of torture, that got her the job??
A mistake is to try to make this a Dem or Repub thing
-
13 hours ago, ChiGoose said:
Truth hurts.
Prejudices are what fools use for reason
-
10 hours ago, Doc said:
Not false at all. Biden took classified information he never had any business having. He knowingly kept them. He kept them in a wholly insecure location. And he shared some with his ghostwriter. You can deny it all you want, but everyone, even daz28, knows it's true.
But he's senile and to charge someone with something you need to be absolutely sure you can get a guilty verdict. Because in the history of the US, there have never been any "not guilty" verdicts (apparently
).
Biden's above the law
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:
Nah, it’s actually that the criminality of the right at the moment is fairly unprecedented. Simply applying the law as it’s usually applied results in literally hundreds of MAGA people being prosecuted.
That then gets spun as bias by grifters and conmen as politicization instead of fairly straightforward enforcement of the law.
blue shades
-
Just now, ChiGoose said:
Fun fact: Trump wasn’t charged under the PRA.Of course not
-
17 minutes ago, daz28 said:
That's not for you, me, Fox news, or trump's lawyers to decide. That's up to the courts who define and implement the laws.
So they're equal?
-
1 hour ago, daz28 said:
Here's the Doc classic once again. All bad things are equal, so I'm allowed to support one side.
They're not equal. Trump had the right to take them via the Presidential Records Act
-
-
7 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Many Republicans who don't support Trump readily express their reasons, unlike you.
I've told many why I didn't. He didn't have the character to be president IMO
-
On 5/21/2024 at 8:13 AM, Joe Ferguson forever said:
Look at the scum trump closely associated with: Cohen, Giuliani, Costello, ***** etc. Birds of a feather. Presumably that's why so many losers are going to vote for him.
In the bigger picture, yeah Trump's character is why I have never voted for him. But in absolutely no way does this rationalize or justify the banana republic shyt the dems have done.
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Why are you so embarrassed to admit you're a Trumpy?
I laugh at idiots like you and Doc who spend all their time criticizing Democrats, yet there seems to be nothing that Trump and MAGA can do that you're willing to critique.
Insecure and weak.
Why do republicans that haven't supported Trump bother you?
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Why are you so insecure with yourself?
Insecure about my criticisms of the Dem party?
In that regard, I guess I can tell you that what the Dem party is currently doing raises concerns with me, similar to what Gabbard has expressed in her book. Have you read it?
-
14 minutes ago, BillStime said:
You do every dayIf making fun of you and your party is in some weird way, a defense of trump, well.....
-
On 5/20/2024 at 3:01 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said:
So his intentions were evil? Then he should man up to it. Aren't justices meant to be just?
explain
-
1
-
Wherever you are, remember this moment for the rest of your life.....
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Or the federal election commission.
And all of this in a jurisdiction that is not prosecuting some pretty serious crimes. This was clearly political.