Jump to content

Motorin'

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Motorin'

  1. 29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

    😂

     

    Quack, MD

     

    You are a CLOWN.

     

    That's a journal op-ed piece.  Absolutely no different than what Alina Chan published in the NYT if you exclude the limited audience.

     

    Notice who they cite in their acknowledgements as well...

     

     Kristian Andersen (Scripps Research Institute), Ralph Baric (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill)

     

    You mean this Kristian Andersen?

     

     

     

    You mean this Ralph Baric?

     

     

     

    This same Ralph Baric at UNC who had been creating novel bat corona viruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for over a decade. Including sequencing cleavages into spike proteins in order to infect mice that he genetically modified to have human lung cells.

     

    https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114658/documents/HHRG-117-IF14-20220427-SD003.pdf

     

     

     

  2. 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    41 Virologists formally disagree with Dr Chan.  btw, she was not faculty at Harvard as suggested by @Motorin'.  She was a post doc.  It's a compelling read and thoroughly referenced rebuttal of Dr Chan's thesis.  And they published it in a journal, not the NYT.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406950/

     

    So a propaganda piece got published in a journal titled, "The harms of promoting the lab leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV-2 origins without evidence."

     

    Except there is damning evidence. Again, none of which is refuted in this "journal" article. They start with the assumption that there is no evidence. And go on and on about how hurtful it is to their field to suggest otherwise.

     

    In real science, not propaganda, you deal with the evidence. The most damning of which is the evidence that COVID jumped from bat to human at a single location, not across the population. Which is how evolution and viruses work. 

     

    You're still living in the dark, pretending that Fauci didn't send a barrage of emails to the entire field, commanding them to deny the lab leak theory. When did he send those emails? When he got an email saying that COVID 19 looks like his virus that he had made in Wuhan.

     

    At some point you're going to pull your head out of your last. Don't be the last person to do it...

     

    And btw, Alina Chin was a post-doc in 2019. She's now an advisor  and researcher at MIT and Harvard...

     

     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  3. 7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    sadly, it could happen.  and that would make you happy.  so f'in strange.

     

    That's what I keep hearing from the left. Better safe then sorry my friend! 

  4. 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    never again.  the changing demographics and American history suggest otherwise.  are you suggesting an end to elections?  do you think that's part of the plan?  would you approve of that?

     

    That's right. No more voting for you. In fact, you've been added to the list. If I were you, I'd head for another continent asap. I see camps in your future... Id say you have weeks to get your family out of the country before they come for you. 

    • Haha (+1) 1
  5. 17 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Oh, a book!  Fauci actually edited the seminal textbook on Infectious disease still widely used by residents and fellows.  He went to Cornell for med school.  I'll wager that at least a few if not many of the virologists polled work at top caliber institutions around the world and that several have written books.  Likely all have published papers.  But hey, a book!  you just can't fix stupid.  It's undeniable but I keep trying.

     

    Good thing you people are never going to control government ever again. 

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  6. Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    did you just miss the probably?

     

    Did you miss any evidence to refute a single point? Cause you, nor any proponent of the zoological theory has presented any. 

     

    The author of the opinion piece has written a book on the subject. She's a molecular biologist at Harvard.

     

    Ball in your court, going to need more than a survey...

     

    But you're carrying water for the industry that was instructed immediately by Fauci to dismiss the lab leak theory. (Because he funded it.)

  7. 1 hour ago, Motorin' said:

     

    The meta-analysis of conflict of influence research is very clear. Those closest to areas of conflict are the least likely to be able to their biases. 

     

    So it's the least surprising thing in the world that virologists would survey strongly against a lab leak theory, due to the proximity of their biases. 

     

    Meanwhile, the science is damning:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/03/opinion/covid-lab-leak.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

     

     

    Again, there's a special place in hell ready for you. 

  8. 46 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

     

    The meta-analysis of conflict of influence research is very clear. Those closest to areas of conflict are the least likely to be able to their biases. 

     

    So it's the least surprising thing in the world that virologists would survey strongly against a lab leak theory, due to the proximity of their biases. 

     

    Meanwhile, the science is damning:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/03/opinion/covid-lab-leak.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

     

    • Haha (+1) 1
  9. 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    the actual science?  actually?  There is no consensus on the origin by the scientific community.  But you maga's just know better.  magical thinking sucks..morons pretending to think sucks worse.

     

    Hell

  10. 9 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Your opinion and $3 will buy a coffee at McDonalds (they’ll charge extra). In contrast, I was paid fairly well for my medical opinion 

     

    It's not my option you human paraquat. It's the actual science, that actual scientists have gone into great lengths explaining why COVID 19 had to have been created in a lab.

     

    And the only thing that you offer is appeal to authority. Not one single attempt to refute the science.

    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  11. 3 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Yes, no doubt I’m damned for caring for sick, dying highly infectious patients before any vaccine or treatment was available. F off. 

     

     

    No you freaking dolt, there's a special place in hell for people using their self-proclaimed expert status to deny the sinister nature of the bio-weapon that was released upon humanity. 

    • Agree 1
  12. 4 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    i do.  i don't know that the virus was leaked from there.  neither do you. but you should tell your fellow magas here how bad it was.  It was not the equivalent of the flu as per a recent post here.  less would have died if they all took the vax and closely followed guidelines.  did you?

     

    There's a special place in hell for you. 

    • Eyeroll 1
    • Disagree 2
    • Agree 1
  13. 9 hours ago, Homelander said:

     

     

    Dems: Putin wants all of Ukraine! And Poland, and all of the Baltics back!

     

    We won't let Ukraine stop fighting until every last soldier is dead! 

     

    Trump: We're going to stop this war by building a buffer zone with peace keeping forces. 

     

    Dems: Nooooo! Appeasement! All Ukrainian must die! Plus our kickbacks will get cutoff. 

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  14. Just now, Jauronimo said:

    The game was out of reach by halftime due to a pick 6 and another forced turnover in the red zone.  The game was basically over before Hurts had to do anything.  Philly could have won that game with Kenny Pickett at QB.

     

    Kenny Pickett could have easily given the Chiefs the 14 point swing they needed to get back in the game. 

     

    It was certainly a whole team win, and the Philly front 4 dominated. 

     

    The secondary was outstanding in coverage and DeJean's pick 6 was the stuff legends are made of. 

     

    I think you're forgetting that Hurts led the opening scoring drive of the game, and was responsible for over 50% of his team's points. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  15. 36 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

    Sweat had 2.5 sacks, 2 TFL's and 3 qb hits. That's a pretty impressive box score. Like I said if we strike out on a Garrett/ Cosby trade, I'm going to work up a strong Sweat.

     

    Roseman and the Front 4 were your MVP's.

     

    Sweat would be an amazing addition, no doubt. 

×
×
  • Create New...