UConn James
-
Posts
8,873 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by UConn James
-
-
I think MM tried to do that by fining him in TC. I read that Bledsoe yelled at him to stay in the Raiders game when he said he hurt his foot again --- along the lines of "Be a man, take some Pepto Bismol!" To Big Mike's credit there, he stayed in and apparently made a good block later in the drive.
Surprised it took this long for someone to say it. Let's see if the tough love treatment will motivate him.
Too bad Matt Foley isn't around to tell him if he doesn't suck it up, he's "going to end up eating a steady diet of government cheese and living in a VAN.... DOWN BY THE RIVER."
-
No he doesn't. We can keep pretending he does, but reality says Congress controls the purse strings of this country and virtually nothing happens without them.
Kerry has been a huge part of the problem for the last 19 years. Ignoring this fact and trumpeting him as the lesser of two evils is at best disingenuous.
For whatever reason, most of you have more than enough facts to know that these two parties are in it for their own power only, yet you continue to follow them down the primrose path - right off the cliff.
4 years from now, regardless of which of these buffoons holds the Executive and which of these parties controls the legislature, AMERICA will be worse off. Our children will be even more poorly educated. The cost of health care will continue to spiral upwards. The military will continue to cost more and more money, despite the fact that we already spend as much as the next 11 countries COMBINED. The deficit will continue to increase, as they trade our very future for short term political appeasement.
You are getting exactly what you deserve.
Well, I rather think this would be an issue much like the Moon Mission. Issue a challenge to America's scientists and businesses as to where they put their resources b/c it's important to the national interests.
AD, I'm sorry but if your political aims don't include being elected President, or if we have 126 candidates like S. Africa, you're NEVER going to be voting for someone you agree with 100 percent of the time on 100 percent of the issues.
The system requires a candidate have so many electoral votes, which, if divided among more than three candidates, the House elects the Pres. But there's another thread for this.... So, you do a cost-benefit analysis and choose the candidate who most nearly accurately is in line with your own views when you balance all and bring all to mind, to borrow from Yeats.
Kerry has a consistent voting record on energy independence. Provide more funding now to acheive independence by 2010, including to get 100,000 hydrogen-powered cars on the road by that year. Voted not to de-fund solar energy tax credits. Look at Bush-Cheney's proposals and actions and it focuses on drilling in ANWR and tribal lands that wouldn't net any oil for 25 years (if any is there), letting the Clean Air Act disappear into the wind, and trying to de-fund sloar energy credits through Republican Senators.
The problem w/ alternative energies is that the monolpolistic oil industry doesn't have a monopoly on hydrogen fuel, solar power, wind energy, etc. Bush's employment history doesn't lead me to believe he wants to change things.
-
I think they actually did that in the redesign.... I can't say I notice it, but it's probably something nuanced that you'd have to be up-close to really see.
Cleveland said they were going to do that to the orange in the helmet, supposedly to match with the sheen on the pants and it's the same deal.
I have some issues with the unis, but this isn't one of them.
-
I actually met him when he came aboard the ship for an all-hands call. It is very hard to judge someone when you are amidst so many other high-ranking officers.
I think that MANY members of this board, both right, moderate, and left, would highly support a Colin Powell candidacy. I for one would be in that support column... it's too bad he won't run.
I don't know if I would. I'd have to hear exactly what HIS positions are on the issues. Being where he is, he tows the company line even though it was said quite often that he disagreed with decisions that were made, tho he always denied this. Re-read the comment Keillor made in his last paragraph about people who stand by and say nothing....
And it's also too bad that if Bush is back in the White House, any moderating forces like Powell isn't going to be asked back. That's how much of a Yes-man environment Bush wants and isn't good for the functioning of any organization --- See: NASA. They're also saying Rumsfeld will fade to black and Wolfowitz will take the post, which doesn't really comfort me any.
-
Could we maybe take a break from the constant ad hom one-liners that have been cut and pasted a thousand times? Seriously, it adds nothing to the debate.
-
Uhm, I rather thought that was a level-headed list of the policy problems that have waylaid the interests of the many versus the interests of the few and well-connected. For "angry," you're going to have to have a duel with Zell Miller, after you stand in line with all the other people he's lunged at.
Fears are being played with, and of course the struggle to find good candidates continues. Someone like an Eisenhower, Truman, or a Roosevelt, who KNEW what it was like to fight and to lead, is sorely needed in this age of heightened alerts and such. That would be the tonic necessary. I long for that day when he is found.I think that man was Wes Clark, unfortunately he wasn't enough of a name candidate. He supports Kerry, and would probably serve as the Secretary of Defense. About the only guy left who was the leader of a sustained and efficient force in modern warfare. My brother served in the NATO coalition under him in the Boz. I think that would be a great change from the current staff of men who fight wars on paper.
-
Ahhh, welcome to the sad reality of the modern era. When more extremist forces took over the Republican Party, it became a haven for these kinds of people.
I compare it to the alteration of the Democratic Party of Kennedy. When he was President, the party became very liberal, and has not drifted far from that course; I am still suprised that Clinton became the presidential candidate in 1992 because of his more moderate views.
We're screwed until the extremists on both sides are told to shut up, and compromise like civil people have to do in society.
I once considered myself a Republican, but this excerpt hits that nail on the head that it's the economic and war/security paranoia side that's had the old Republican Party pack its bags and move two blocks to the right.
Clinton, Gore, Lieberman and the DLC were created before '92 as a moderating force to a too-liberal Democratic Party. And with all the aftermath of the past 4 years, many Dems up and moved to the right as well, which has made them more in line with the old GOP than most current Republicans.
We just suffer the ad hominum attacks, complaints and shouting of the current age. I hope we get some good debates this time where the ISSUES are discussed rather than the men. B/c if Kerry does and takes a stand to this "Flip flop" charge, he'll show Bush for what he is.
-
Nope. Just like she doesn't have the right to tell him to not get a vasectomy. I honestly don't know where to stand on this issue b/c for every A there's a B.
However, there was an interesting case... I'd say five or more years ago, where a man kidnapped the woman and kept her locked up until she could no longer have an abortion. It being time out of mind, I think I remember the judge was sympathetic to the man's plight. Don't know what came of it, tho.
is there any actual written law on this specific topic?Roe v. Wade? Try www.findlaw.com
-
Players say in today's game, trading protection (even in vital areas) for speed is a no-brainer. They say injuries to that area -- the telltale "No. 52 had the wind knocked out him; his return is questionable" -- are just too rare to even worry about.
Yeah, tell that to Virgil Livers.
He's a former defensive back who played for the Chicago Bears from 1975-79. While fielding a punt at Soldier Field, Livers was speared in the groin. By halftime, one of his testicles had swollen so badly it had to be -- ugh, more flop sweat, oh the cramps ... breathe, breathe! -- drained with a needle by the trainers. Somehow, Livers suited up for the second half. That was a bad idea. A really, really, really bad idea. Later that night, he was rushed to the hospital where the mangled orb was surgically removed.
-
We're Not in Lake Wobegon Anymore
How did the Party of Lincoln and Liberty transmogrify into the party of Newt Gingrich’s evil spawn and their Etch-A-Sketch president, a dull and rigid man, whose philosophy is a jumble of badly sutured body parts trying to walk?
By Garrison Keillor
Something has gone seriously haywire with the Republican Party. Once, it was the party of pragmatic Main Street businessmen in steel-rimmed spectacles who decried profligacy and waste, were devoted to their communities and supported the sort of prosperity that raises all ships. They were good-hearted people who vanquished the gnarlier elements of their party, the paranoid Roosevelt-haters, the flat Earthers and Prohibitionists, the antipapist antiforeigner element. The genial Eisenhower was their man, a genuine American hero of D-Day, who made it OK for reasonable people to vote Republican. He brought the Korean War to a stalemate, produced the Interstate Highway System, declined to rescue the French colonial army in Vietnam, and gave us a period of peace and prosperity, in which (oddly) American arts and letters flourished and higher education burgeoned-and there was a degree of plain decency in the country. Fifties Republicans were giants compared to today’s. Richard Nixon was the last Republican leader to feel a Christian obligation toward the poor.
In the years between Nixon and Newt Gingrich, the party migrated southward down the Twisting Trail of Rhetoric and sneered at the idea of public service and became the Scourge of Liberalism, the Great Crusade Against the Sixties, the Death Star of Government, a gang of pirates that diverted and fascinated the media by their sheer chutzpah, such as the misty-eyed flag-waving of Ronald Reagan who, while George McGovern flew bombers in World War II, took a pass and made training films in Long Beach. The Nixon moderate vanished like the passenger pigeon, purged by a legion of angry white men who rose to power on pure punk politics. “Bipartisanship is another term of date rape,” says Grover Norquist, the Sid Vicious of the GOP. “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” The boy has Oedipal problems and government is his daddy.
The party of Lincoln and Liberty was transmogrified into the party of hairy-backed swamp developers and corporate shills, faith-based economists, fundamentalist bullies with Bibles, Christians of convenience, freelance racists, misanthropic frat boys, shrieking midgets of AM radio, tax cheats, nihilists in golf pants, brownshirts in pinstripes, sweatshop tycoons, hacks, fakirs, aggressive dorks, Lamborghini libertarians, people who believe Neil Armstrong’s moonwalk was filmed in Roswell, New Mexico, little honkers out to diminish the rest of us, Newt’s evil spawn and their Etch-A-Sketch president, a dull and rigid man suspicious of the free flow of information and of secular institutions, whose philosophy is a jumble of badly sutured body parts trying to walk. Republicans: The No.1 reason the rest of the world thinks we’re deaf, dumb and dangerous.
Rich ironies abound! Lies pop up like toadstools in the forest! Wild swine crowd round the public trough! Outrageous gerrymandering! Pocket lining on a massive scale! Paid lobbyists sit in committee rooms and write legislation to alleviate the suffering of billionaires! Hypocrisies shine like cat turds in the moonlight! O Mark Twain, where art thou at this hour? Arise and behold the Gilded Age reincarnated gaudier than ever, upholding great wealth as the sure sign of Divine Grace.
Here in 2004, George W. Bush is running for reelection on a platform of tragedy-the single greatest failure of national defense in our history, the attacks of 9/11 in which 19 men with box cutters put this nation into a tailspin, a failure the details of which the White House fought to keep secret even as it ran the country into hock up to the hubcaps, thanks to generous tax cuts for the well-fixed, hoping to lead us into a box canyon of debt that will render government impotent, even as we engage in a war against a small country that was undertaken for the president’s personal satisfaction but sold to the American public on the basis of brazen misinformation, a war whose purpose is to distract us from an enormous transfer of wealth taking place in this country, flowing upward, and the deception is working beautifully.
The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the few is the death knell of democracy. No republic in the history of humanity has survived this. The election of 2004 will say something about what happens to ours. The omens are not good.
Our beloved land has been fogged with fear-fear, the greatest political strategy ever. An ominous silence, distant sirens, a drumbeat of whispered warnings and alarms to keep the public uneasy and silence the opposition. And in a time of vague fear, you can appoint bullet-brained judges, strip the bark off the Constitution, eviscerate federal regulatory agencies, bring public education to a standstill, stupefy the press, lavish gorgeous tax breaks on the rich.
There is a stink drifting through this election year. It isn’t the Florida recount or the Supreme Court decision. No, it’s 9/11 that we keep coming back to. It wasn’t the “end of innocence,” or a turning point in our history, or a cosmic occurrence, it was an event, a lapse of security. And patriotism shouldn’t prevent people from asking hard questions of the man who was purportedly in charge of national security at the time.
Whenever I think of those New Yorkers hurrying along Park Place or getting off the No.1 Broadway local, hustling toward their office on the 90th floor, the morning paper under their arms, I think of that non-reader George W. Bush and how he hopes to exploit those people with a little economic uptick, maybe the capture of Osama, cruise to victory in November and proceed to get some serious nation-changing done in his second term.
This year, as in the past, Republicans will portray us Democrats as embittered academics, desiccated Unitarians, whacked-out hippies and communards, people who talk to telephone poles, the party of the Deadheads. They will wave enormous flags and wow over and over the footage of firemen in the wreckage of the World Trade Center and bodies being carried out and they will lie about their economic policies with astonishing enthusiasm.
The Union is what needs defending this year. Government of Enron and by Halliburton and for the Southern Baptists is not the same as what Lincoln spoke of. This gang of Pithecanthropus Republicanii has humbugged us to death on terrorism and tax cuts for the comfy and school prayer and flag burning and claimed the right to know what books we read and to dump their sewage upstream from the town and clear-cut the forests and gut the IRS and mark up the constitution on behalf of intolerance and promote the corporate takeover of the public airwaves and to hell with anybody who opposes them.
This is a great country, and it wasn’t made so by angry people. We have a sacred duty to bequeath it to our grandchildren in better shape than however we found it. We have a long way to go and we’re not getting any younger.
Dante said that the hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who in time of crisis remain neutral, so I have spoken my piece, and thank you, dear reader. It’s a beautiful world, rain or shine, and there is more to life than winning.
Excerpt from Keillor's new book (© 2004)
-
Yep. We get their games often. Peyton Manning he's not. But is a good college player b/c he's smart and does his part w/in their system.
-
Can you kick a 42 yard FG?
I can kick extra points and up to about 25 yards with about 90 percent accuracy. Which is better than the UConn kicker..... Think my eligibility's gone tho.
-
Uhhmmm. OK, you can find file types on Google.
Just type, in quotes, "Parent Directory" and ".xls" and it'll give you some lists of Excel spreadsheet files. Hope that answers your query....
-
I haven't gotten Sketches b/c Jeff wanted to scrap it and start over before his drowning. But Grace is HIGHLY recommended. Just recently got the Legacy Edition remaster. He basically started the "emo" genre, but that's reductive to his entire style. Great voice and actual FEELING in the words and music. I can't tell you how many artists name him as a big influence.
I'd also suggest Jane Monheit - "Come Dream With Me"
-
I am not quite sure why the antaganizing lead...we seem to be on the same page here. I am all for the first amendment and freedom of the press. However, i view the vast majority of the media as entertainment rather than a news source at this point. I base this on the over sensationalizing of stories for the sole purpose of increasing ratings.
This is not a conclusion I came upon because of the Dan Rather story alone. But one over many years of watching the news. Remember all the shark attacks one year? It was no more than any other year. Why the media frenzy over it? One year they went crazy with child abductions. Was it more than normal? No. But it got the attention of the public and they ran it to death. Then there was the disease era. Remember smallpox, sars, west nile and monkeypox? What happened to them? did they just go away? No. Its just not a story that gets ratings anymore.
The urge to be the first one supporting a story, superseeds the underlying accuracy of the story. This is wrong.
While I fully support the media, and freedom of the press, the press is not doing its intended job. They are giant profit producting corporations producing television programs, with the sole purpose of making money for their stakeholders. While I am also not against the profit motive, the two collide, and do a net disservice to the american people.
What's antagonizing about the lead? It was a simple question. You think you can get the real story from a PR firm? which is what the White House Press Office is. You want to distrust all media and simply want them to report/broadcast the Official Approved Version, you're free to, but it's not much different than listening to that hilarious Iraqi Information Minister.
I actually majored in journalism. I'm also in Phi Beta Kappa -- read: Top 1% of graduates, so you're not dealing with a dumb a$$ (I'm sticking to the graphic design, but I did all the aspects). Yes, we all know about the problems of the media, and it's a pretty consistent rate of flubs in every newsroom, CBS, FOX, the Pat Robertson Network, whatever. 99 percent of reporters do not intentionally try to skew news. 100 percent are suseptible to reporting the opinions of people who are lying or have an agenda. They'll be set straight eventually, in the process noted before.
Sensationalism.... Yep, sometimes, dead horses are beat. That's under the auspices of "Giving people what they want" when a lot of old newspeople don't *know* what people want. Some themes are hyped, as you say. (I don't know what you're watching (tho it's better to READ your news!) but the "disease era" reporting never went away, and for good reason.) Just b/c you don't see it in the Buffalo News this week doesn't mean it's not being covered somewhere. There's a finite space in a newspaper or 30 minute broadcast. Editorial decisions are made. If you think you can do it entirely w/o criticism, man, feel free to try! B/c everyone's intent on shooting the messenger these days when they don't like what the news is. Sometimes it's warranted, many times not. Do I look over your shoulder at your job and yell that you're cooking my steak wrong?
'Well, it's like the prostitute once said - it's not the work, it's the stairs.' -- Elaine Stritch
-
When has he taken the Howard Dean approach, short of the Talking Heads saying he has, that we never should have gone into Iraq? He has said that the war is being run by a jackass instead of letting the generals do their jobs (much the same way LBJ micromanaged Vietnam and killed more troops than the VC...), and getting a true international coalition (by opening the contracts up to more than Haliburton, b/c it's all about the money, sad to say). Short of that, we'll need more troops in there. The strategy isn't working, you can be bull-headed or you can propose solutions. Everything can't be summed up by a six-word sentence. Simply accusing someone of being a flip-flopper, a charge that's been used in Pres. races since the '50s, but that still doesn't make it true.
"The only issue that isn't complex is one you haven't yet looked at in detail." -- A great nutrition science prof.
-
Are these the same major news stations who report on forged documents. Are these the same major news stations that called the 2000 election wrong, not once but twice? Are these the same major news stations that are more concerned with sensationalizing the news and gaining ratings than reporting the news? I think it is.
I hate to say it, but it almost seems as if you cant even trust the news in this country anymore.
OK, Jimbob. Why don't you put the blindfold on and reach out to have Ari Fleisher and Dan Bartlet lead the way.
Media is only as good as the sources who come forward. CBS got taken hook, line, sinker. It happens when you think someone's being square with you. We thought Bush was being square with us in his Saddam-is-getting-uranium-from-Africa speech. His source for this was Chalabi(?) who is in jail for myriad offenses.
To blame all media (and especially since this is TV news, which let's face it....) for a CBS schlump is dangerous for our democracy. That's what the first amendment was for; so we'd be able to learn all of the facts. Guess what? The first amendment worked here. Those Framers really knew what they were doing, huh?
And just b/c they're retracting it, doesn't mean that Bush was Audie Murphy reincarnate. Did he get favors b/c of his name? Pro-bab-ly. A lot of guys did. Does it matter? Not all that much. Maybe we can have some real debate about the future.
-
That's a lot like how the Raiders (and every team, unless they're stupid enough to provide bulletin board material) say they respected the Bills the week before the game. Then on Sunday afternoon, they laughed their pitutes off.
-
Okay, then. Let's NEVER put JP in as the starter b/c he might break a nail!! When the doctors say he's ready to go, he can go. PERIOD.
And sorry to say, but Brady and Pennington were 2nd year players on paper only. That, and, Manning was probably the strongest part of an otherwise weak Colts team his first season. Just like the Drew apologists, you can't blame him for the faults of others. Only, Manning was able to succeed and get better despite his surrounding cast, then last year they should have gone to the SB when they had the cast assembled. We've got the players assembled around Drew, we actually have a D. But he's too old to learn new tricks and he doesn't fit the offense, folks. That's how Brady is able to succeed.
We're still trying to jam the square peg into the round hole.
-
Well, yeah, I thought I had that point in there but it wasn't.... That too. You think some of them would have learned.
Barring leaving the country and letting happen what's going to happen anyway be it next week or in 50 years, namely destruction, chaos and an "Islamic democracy," contractors should be given a few grenades they have on them at all times. Maybe these asssshats wearing bedsheets on their heads would think twice.
-
Bush has taken some distinct positions on Iraq too.
September 2002--they have weapons of mass destruction
Septemeber 2002--we should have UN help regarding WMD
March 2003--Saddam has ties to al-Qaida and will share weapons of mass destruction with them
March 2003--we don't need help from UN
April/May 2003--Mission Accomplished
Fall 2003--Saddam had two mobile trailers to make biological weapons
Winter 2004--no weapons of mass destruction, but Saddam was a brutal dictator and needed to be eliminated as a world threat
Spring/Summer 2004--we needed to go into Iraq to bring it democracy
Fall 2004--we need UN help to stablize Iraq
I think that is 9 distinct positions on Iraq for Bush too.
Don't forget, We needed to provide humanitarian relief to the Iraqi people.
Which, of course, made him more of a bleeding heart than the supposed bleeding heart liberal like Dean who said we should not have gone in at all, in any form.
Single-handed paradigm shift from 70+ years of conservative ideology, and getting in the White House with the phrase "no nation-building." Welp, looks like that brilliant strategy went breasts-up 6 months in.... Wow, maybe the Dems were right with the philosophy that it's better to spend a $40M worth of the carrot than $200B and 1,000 soldiers worth of the stick. That's why W and his ilk are labeled "neo-cons." They left conservativism in the dust on their way to the extremist right.
-
I'll give you the borders-I'm mad at that, but how do you know about our nuke plants or shipping yards?
HUH? About 5 percent of cargo containers are checked. Steve Croft on 60 Minutes, *walked into* a chemical plant -- open gates! -- with a reporter in Penn. who did a story that many plants around the country were the same way. Tests of nuclear plant security are done by the same security company who know the details beforehand, and they don't release the results, pro'ly b/c they aren't good. Several governors have called for increased security at nuclear plants and got none. This is a matter of record.
And yeah, if Gore were pulling the same stuff as Bush, he probably would have been impeached, drawn and quartered last year for lying to the country when all of his promises were considered false by all but the True Believers. And yeah, when it's a matter of some gravity, I believe the President should be considered "Under Oath" when he's speaking to us.
-
What I don't get is, why not fight back? In some of the videos, their hands were free to hold up IDs. Why not try to grab a gun and see how much damage you can do? Instead they sat there and endured what must be a very painful death, and I for one, wouldn't want my death to be propaganda. You think they're going to release tape that shows one of their guys getting hit alongside the face? Might get shot, but what're they going to do, cut your head off?
NEVER GIVE UP.
-
They said that about Jim Kelly. When is JP supposed to start the NFL growing pains? And actually, this so-called poor rookie season didn't seem to happen for Brady, Manning or Pennington.
Too many people are in the McNabb-McNair mode of thought that by holding them back a year, they'll magically be better than they were. And for the ones who start right away and tank, they weren't good enough for the NFL to begin with(!) --- Leaf, Boller, Mirer, etc. I think JP's got that special quality/fire you need to be a great QB.
Question for Penn State fans
in College Football
Posted
Speaking as an observer not a fan, but yeah, it's time for him to be watching from a respected position in the stands, and perhaps act as an adviser to the program. I believe he has a lifetime contract, if not in writing then at least tacitly.
It's a lot like Calhoun or Geno here, but I can tell you that in these types of situations, the coach always hangs on for longer than he should.